From 1a2ea887a5cd7d47bab599f733d89444df018b1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 13:59:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: check the return value of pinmux_ops::get_function_name() commit 4002ee98c022d671ecc1e4a84029e9ae7d8a5603 upstream. While the API contract in docs doesn't specify it explicitly, the generic implementation of the get_function_name() callback from struct pinmux_ops - pinmux_generic_get_function_name() - can fail and return NULL. This is already checked in pinmux_check_ops() so add a similar check in pinmux_func_name_to_selector() instead of passing the returned pointer right down to strcmp() where the NULL can get dereferenced. This is normal operation when adding new pinfunctions. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Neil Armstrong Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c index ab853d6c586b..1c324d216ad7 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int pinmux_func_name_to_selector(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, while (selector < nfuncs) { const char *fname = ops->get_function_name(pctldev, selector); - if (!strcmp(function, fname)) + if (fname && !strcmp(function, fname)) return selector; selector++;