From 1d648e44e902e063f8a34c1acdd1fbe06df19cb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:09:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Allow checking of a CPU-local erratum commit 8f4137588261d7504f4aa022dc9d1a1fd1940e8e upstream. this_cpu_has_cap() only checks the feature array, and not the errata one. In order to be able to check for a CPU-local erratum, allow it to inspect the latter as well. This is consistent with cpus_have_cap()'s behaviour, which includes errata already. Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Signed-off-by: Alex Shi [v4.9 backport] Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland [v4.9 backport] Tested-by: Will Deacon Tested-by: Greg Hackmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index d24e59cedae5..810f8bf7c57f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -1103,20 +1103,29 @@ static void __init setup_feature_capabilities(void) * Check if the current CPU has a given feature capability. * Should be called from non-preemptible context. */ -bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap) +static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array, + unsigned int cap) { const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps; if (WARN_ON(preemptible())) return false; - for (caps = arm64_features; caps->desc; caps++) + for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++) if (caps->capability == cap && caps->matches) return caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU); return false; } +extern const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[]; + +bool this_cpu_has_cap(unsigned int cap) +{ + return (__this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_features, cap) || + __this_cpu_has_cap(arm64_errata, cap)); +} + void __init setup_cpu_features(void) { u32 cwg;