From 350e127daec15015f989e77bcb5dae855d889b38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:44:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] UPSTREAM: sched/core: Add missing update_rq_clock() call in set_user_nice() Address this rq-clock update bug: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 195 at ../kernel/sched/sched.h:797 set_next_entity() rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP Call Trace: dump_stack() __warn() warn_slowpath_fmt() set_next_entity() ? _raw_spin_lock() set_curr_task_fair() set_user_nice.part.85() set_user_nice() create_worker() worker_thread() kthread() ret_from_fork() Change-Id: I8fb2653b2d9cb3bbc1637c1bcbf1c0645752ef12 Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar (cherry picked from commit 2fb8d36787affe26f3536c3d8ec094995a48037d) Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 9459ddc94952..b1939abf23b4 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -3921,6 +3921,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) * the task might be in the middle of scheduling on another CPU. */ rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf); + update_rq_clock(rq); + /* * The RT priorities are set via sched_setscheduler(), but we still * allow the 'normal' nice value to be set - but as expected