From 8feb7885b769cdad63a45c8d477b7e09a7b773f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: SeongJae Park Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 11:19:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/damon/tests/core-kunit: handle alloc failures on damon_test_split_at() commit 5e80d73f22043c59c8ad36452a3253937ed77955 upstream. damon_test_split_at() is assuming all dynamic memory allocation in it will succeed. Those are indeed likely in the real use cases since those allocations are too small to fail, but theoretically those could fail. In the case, inappropriate memory access can happen. Fix it by appropriately cleanup pre-allocated memory and skip the execution of the remaining tests in the failure cases. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251101182021.74868-6-sj@kernel.org Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests") Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park Cc: Brendan Higgins Cc: David Gow Cc: Kefeng Wang Cc: [5.15+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/damon/core-test.h | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/damon/core-test.h b/mm/damon/core-test.h index 24ef1462c604..66c02253b313 100644 --- a/mm/damon/core-test.h +++ b/mm/damon/core-test.h @@ -129,8 +129,19 @@ static void damon_test_split_at(struct kunit *test) struct damon_target *t; struct damon_region *r; + if (!c) + kunit_skip(test, "ctx alloc fail"); t = damon_new_target(); + if (!t) { + damon_destroy_ctx(c); + kunit_skip(test, "target alloc fail"); + } r = damon_new_region(0, 100); + if (!r) { + damon_destroy_ctx(c); + damon_free_target(t); + kunit_skip(test, "region alloc fail"); + } damon_add_region(r, t); damon_split_region_at(t, r, 25); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 0ul);