mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 02:21:52 +09:00
swiotlb: Fix alignment checks when both allocation and DMA masks are present
[ Upstream commit 51b30ecb73b481d5fac6ccf2ecb4a309c9ee3310 ]
Nicolin reports that swiotlb buffer allocations fail for an NVME device
behind an IOMMU using 64KiB pages. This is because we end up with a
minimum allocation alignment of 64KiB (for the IOMMU to map the buffer
safely) but a minimum DMA alignment mask corresponding to a 4KiB NVME
page (i.e. preserving the 4KiB page offset from the original allocation).
If the original address is not 4KiB-aligned, the allocation will fail
because swiotlb_search_pool_area() erroneously compares these unmasked
bits with the 64KiB-aligned candidate allocation.
Tweak swiotlb_search_pool_area() so that the DMA alignment mask is
reduced based on the required alignment of the allocation.
Fixes: 82612d66d5 ("iommu: Allow the dma-iommu api to use bounce buffers")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1707851466.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com
Reported-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
8d8be62a7d
commit
ef80ecc721
@@ -654,8 +654,7 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
|
||||
dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr =
|
||||
phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, mem->start) & boundary_mask;
|
||||
unsigned long max_slots = get_max_slots(boundary_mask);
|
||||
unsigned int iotlb_align_mask =
|
||||
dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & ~(IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
|
||||
unsigned int iotlb_align_mask = dma_get_min_align_mask(dev);
|
||||
unsigned int nslots = nr_slots(alloc_size), stride;
|
||||
unsigned int index, wrap, count = 0, i;
|
||||
unsigned int offset = swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
|
||||
@@ -666,6 +665,14 @@ static int swiotlb_do_find_slots(struct device *dev, int area_index,
|
||||
BUG_ON(!nslots);
|
||||
BUG_ON(area_index >= mem->nareas);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure that the allocation is at least slot-aligned and update
|
||||
* 'iotlb_align_mask' to ignore bits that will be preserved when
|
||||
* offsetting into the allocation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
alloc_align_mask |= (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
|
||||
iotlb_align_mask &= ~alloc_align_mask;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For mappings with an alignment requirement don't bother looping to
|
||||
* unaligned slots once we found an aligned one. For allocations of
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user