[ Upstream commit 7442edec72bc657e6ce38ae01de9f10e55decfaa ]
The MT6358 and MT6366 PMICs, and likely many others from MediaTek, have
a chip ID register, making the chip semi-discoverable.
The driver currently supports two PMICs and expects to be probed on one
or the other. It does not account for incorrect mfd driver entries or
device trees. While these should not happen, if they do, it could be
catastrophic for the device. The driver should be sure the hardware is
what it expects.
Make the driver fail to probe if the chip ID presented is not a known
one.
Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Fixes: f0e3c6261a ("regulator: mt6366: Add support for MT6366 regulator")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913082919.1631287-2-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8adb4e647a ]
When fixing a memory leak in commit d3c731564e ("regulator: plug
of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path") it moved the
device_initialize() call earlier, but did not move the `dev->class`
initialization. The bug was spotted and fixed by reverting part of
the commit (in commit 5f4b204b6b "regulator: core: fix kobject
release warning and memory leak in regulator_register()") but
introducing a different bug: now early error paths use `kfree(dev)`
instead of `put_device()` for an already initialized `struct device`.
Move the missing assignments to just after `device_initialize()`.
Fixes: d3c731564e ("regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b5b19cb458c40c9d02f3d5a7bd1ba7d97ba17279.1695077303.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7e37c85137 ]
The buck and linear range LDO (VSRAM_*) regulators share one set of ops.
This set includes support for get/set mode. However this only makes
sense for buck regulators, not LDOs. The callbacks were not checking
whether the register offset and/or mask for mode setting was valid or
not. This ends up making the kernel report "normal" mode operation for
the LDOs.
Create a new set of ops without the get/set mode callbacks for the
linear range LDO regulators.
Fixes: f67ff1bd58 ("regulator: mt6358: Add support for MT6358 regulator")
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920085336.136238-1-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit ea861df772 ]
Some of the regulators on the MT6358/MT6366 PMICs have just one linear
voltage range. These are the bulk regulators and VSRAM_* LDOs. Currently
they are modeled with one linear range, but also have their minimum,
maximum, and step voltage described.
Convert them to the linear voltage helpers. These helpers are a bit
simpler, and we can also drop the linear range definitions. Also reflow
the touched lines now that they are shorter.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230609083009.2822259-7-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 7e37c85137 ("regulator: mt6358: split ops for buck and linear range LDO regulators")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 04ba665248 ]
The *_SSHUB regulators are actually alternate configuration interfaces
for their non *_SSHUB counterparts. They are not separate regulator
outputs. These registers are intended for the companion processor to
use to configure the power rails while the main processor is sleeping.
They are not intended for the main operating system to use.
Since they are not real outputs they shouldn't be modeled separately.
Remove them. Luckily no device tree actually uses them.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230609083009.2822259-5-wenst@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 7e37c85137 ("regulator: mt6358: split ops for buck and linear range LDO regulators")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit f050e56de8 upstream.
The driver's probe() first registers regulators in a loop and then in a
second loop passes them as irq data to the interrupt handlers. However
the function to get the regulator for given name
tps65219_get_rdev_by_name() was a no-op due to argument passed by value,
not pointer, thus the second loop assigned always same value - from
previous loop. The interrupts, when fired, where executed with wrong
data. Compiler also noticed it:
drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c: In function ‘tps65219_get_rdev_by_name’:
drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:292:60: error: parameter ‘dev’ set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-parameter]
Fixes: c12ac5fc3e ("regulator: drivers: Add TI TPS65219 PMIC regulators support")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230507144656.192800-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 08880713ce ]
If CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set:
regulator: Failed to create debugfs directory
...
regulator-dummy: Failed to create debugfs directory
As per the comments for debugfs_create_dir(), errors returned by this
function should be expected, and ignored:
* If debugfs is not enabled in the kernel, the value -%ENODEV will be
* returned.
*
* NOTE: it's expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors returned
* by this function. Other debugfs functions handle the fact that the "dentry"
* passed to them could be an error and they don't crash in that case.
* Drivers should generally work fine even if debugfs fails to init anyway.
Adhere to the debugfs spirit, and streamline all operations by:
1. Demoting the importance of the printed error messages to debug
level, like is already done in create_regulator(),
2. Further ignoring any returned errors, as by design, all debugfs
functions are no-ops when passed an error pointer.
Fixes: 2bf1c45be3 ("regulator: Fix error checking for debugfs_create_dir")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2f8bb6e113359ddfab7b59e4d4274bd4c06d6d0a.1685013051.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c4a413e56d ]
Smatch reports:
drivers/regulator/stm32-pwr.c:166 stm32_pwr_regulator_probe() warn:
'base' from of_iomap() not released on lines: 151,166.
In stm32_pwr_regulator_probe(), base is not released
when devm_kzalloc() fails to allocate memory or
devm_regulator_register() fails to register a new regulator device,
which may cause a leak.
To fix this issue, replace of_iomap() with
devm_platform_ioremap_resource(). devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
is a specialized function for platform devices.
It allows 'base' to be automatically released whether the probe
function succeeds or fails.
Besides, use IS_ERR(base) instead of !base
as the return value of devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
can either be a pointer to the remapped memory or
an ERR_PTR() encoded error code if the operation fails.
Fixes: dc62f951a6 ("regulator: stm32-pwr: Fix return value check in stm32_pwr_regulator_probe()")
Signed-off-by: YAN SHI <m202071378@hust.edu.cn>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304111750.o2643eJN-lkp@intel.com/
Reviewed-by: Dongliang Mu <dzm91@hust.edu.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412033529.18890-1-m202071378@hust.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cba6cfdc7c ]
An automated bot told me that there was a potential lockdep problem
with regulators. This was on the chromeos-5.15 kernel, but I see
nothing that would be different downstream compared to upstream. The
bot said:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u16:4/115 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff8083110170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
but task is already holding lock:
ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/115:
#0: ffffff808006a948 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x520/0x1348
#1: ffffffc00e0a7cc0 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x55c/0x1348
#2: ffffff80828a2260 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0xd0/0x2a4
#3: ffffff808378e170 (regulator_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ww_mutex_trylock+0x3c/0x7b8
stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 115 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.15.104-lockdep-17461-gc1e499ed6604 #1 9292e52fa83c0e23762b2b3aa1bacf5787a4d5da
Hardware name: Google Quackingstick (rev0+) (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x4ec
show_stack+0x34/0x50
dump_stack_lvl+0xdc/0x11c
dump_stack+0x1c/0x48
__lock_acquire+0x16d4/0x6c74
lock_acquire+0x208/0x750
__mutex_lock_common+0x11c/0x11f8
ww_mutex_lock+0xc0/0x440
create_regulator+0x398/0x7ec
regulator_resolve_supply+0x654/0x7c4
regulator_register_resolve_supply+0x30/0x120
class_for_each_device+0x1b8/0x230
regulator_register+0x17a4/0x1f40
devm_regulator_register+0x60/0xd0
reg_fixed_voltage_probe+0x728/0xaec
platform_probe+0x150/0x1c8
really_probe+0x274/0xa20
__driver_probe_device+0x1dc/0x3f4
driver_probe_device+0x78/0x1c0
__device_attach_driver+0x1ac/0x2c8
bus_for_each_drv+0x11c/0x190
__device_attach_async_helper+0x1e4/0x2a4
async_run_entry_fn+0xa0/0x3ac
process_one_work+0x638/0x1348
worker_thread+0x4a8/0x9c4
kthread+0x2e4/0x3a0
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
The problem was first reported soon after we made many of the
regulators probe asynchronously, though nothing I've seen implies that
the problems couldn't have also happened even without that.
I haven't personally been able to reproduce the lockdep issue, but the
issue does look somewhat legitimate. Specifically, it looks like in
regulator_resolve_supply() we are holding a "rdev" lock while calling
set_supply() -> create_regulator() which grabs the lock of a
_different_ "rdev" (the one for our supply). This is not necessarily
safe from a lockdep perspective since there is no documented ordering
between these two locks.
In reality, we should always be locking a regulator before the
supplying regulator, so I don't expect there to be any real deadlocks
in practice. However, the regulator framework in general doesn't
express this to lockdep.
Let's fix the issue by simply grabbing the two locks involved in the
same way we grab multiple locks elsewhere in the regulator framework:
using the "wound/wait" mechanisms.
Fixes: eaa7995c52 ("regulator: core: avoid regulator_resolve_supply() race condition")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.2.I30d8e1ca10cfbe5403884cdd192253a2e063eb9e@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b83a1772be ]
When a codepath locks a rdev using ww_mutex_lock_slow() directly then
that codepath is responsible for incrementing the "ref_cnt" and also
setting the "mutex_owner" to "current".
The regulator core consistently got that right for "ref_cnt" but
didn't always get it right for "mutex_owner". Let's fix this.
It's unlikely that this truly matters because the "mutex_owner" is
only needed if we're going to do subsequent locking of the same
rdev. However, even though it's not truly needed it seems less
surprising if we consistently set "mutex_owner" properly.
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329143317.RFC.v2.1.I4e9d433ea26360c06dd1381d091c82bb1a4ce843@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 691c1fcda5 ]
This is very close to a straight revert of commit 218320fec2
("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on
regulators"). We've identified that patch as causing a boot speed
regression on sc7180-trogdor boards. While boot speed certainly isn't
more important than making sure that power sequencing is correct,
looking closely at the original change it doesn't seem to have been
fully justified. It mentions "cycling issues" without describing
exactly what the issues were. That means it's possible that the
cycling issues were really a problem that should be fixed in a
different way.
Let's take a careful look at how we should handle regulators that have
an off-on-delay and that are boot-on or always-on. Linux currently
doesn't have any way to identify whether a GPIO regulator was already
on when the kernel booted. That means that when the kernel boots we
probe a regulator, see that it wants boot-on / always-on we, and then
turn the regulator on. We could be in one of two cases when we do
this:
a) The regulator might have been left on by the bootloader and we're
ensuring that it stays on.
b) The regulator might have been left off by the bootloader and we're
just now turning it on.
For case a) we definitely don't need any sort of delay. For case b) we
_might_ need some delay in case the bootloader turned the regulator
off _right_ before booting the kernel. To get the proper delay for
case b) then we can just assume a `last_off` of 0, which is what it
gets initialized to by default.
As per above, we can't tell whether we're in case a) or case b) so
we'll assume the longer delay (case b). This basically puts the code
to how it was before commit 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix
off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"). However, we add
one important change: we make sure that the delay is actually honored
if `last_off` is 0. Though the original "cycling issues" cited were
vague, I'm hopeful that this important extra change will be enough to
fix the issues that the initial commit mentioned.
With this fix, I've confined that on a sc7180-trogdor board the delay
at boot goes down from 500 ms to ~250 ms. That's not as good as the 0
ms that we had prior to commit 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix
off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators"), but it's probably
safer because we don't know if the bootloader turned the regulator off
right before booting.
One note is that it's possible that we could be in a state that's not
a) or b) if there are other issues in the kernel. The only one I can
think of is related to pinctrl. If the pinctrl driver being used on a
board isn't careful about avoiding glitches when setting up a pin then
it's possible that setting up a pin could cause the regulator to "turn
off" briefly immediately before the regulator probes. If this is
indeed causing problems then the pinctrl driver should be fixed,
perhaps in a similar way to what was done in commit d21f4b7ffc
("pinctrl: qcom: Avoid glitching lines when we first mux to output")
Fixes: 218320fec2 ("regulator: core: Fix off-on-delay-us for always-on/boot-on regulators")
Cc: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313111806.1.I2eaad872be0932a805c239a7c7a102233fb0b03b@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 80d2c29e09 upstream.
For regulators with 'off-on-delay-us' the regulator framework currently
uses ktime_get() to determine how long the regulator has been off
before re-enabling it (after a delay if needed). A problem with using
ktime_get() is that it doesn't account for the time the system is
suspended. As a result a regulator with a longer 'off-on-delay' (e.g.
500ms) that was switched off during suspend might still incurr in a
delay on resume before it is re-enabled, even though the regulator
might have been off for hours. ktime_get_boottime() accounts for
suspend time, use it instead of ktime_get().
Fixes: a8ce7bd896 ("regulator: core: Fix off_on_delay handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.13+
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230223003301.v2.1.I9719661b8eb0a73b8c416f9c26cf5bd8c0563f99@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 4fd8bcec5f ]
Explicitly bounds-check the id before accessing the opmode array. Seen
with GCC 13:
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c: In function 'max77802_enable':
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:217:29: warning: array subscript [0, 41] is outside array bounds of 'unsigned int[42]' [-Warray-bounds=]
217 | if (max77802->opmode[id] == MAX77802_OFF_PWRREQ)
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
../drivers/regulator/max77802-regulator.c:62:22: note: while referencing 'opmode'
62 | unsigned int opmode[MAX77802_REG_MAX];
| ^~~~~~
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230127225203.never.864-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 02228f6aa6 ]
If the system does not come from reset (like when it is kexec()), the
regulator might have an IRQ waiting for us.
If we enable the IRQ handler before its structures are ready, we crash.
This patch fixes:
[ 1.141839] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at virtual address 0000000000000078
[ 1.316096] Call trace:
[ 1.316101] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x20/0xa8
[ 1.322757] cpu cpu0: dummy supplies not allowed for exclusive requests
[ 1.327823] regulator_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
[ 1.327825] da9211_irq_handler+0x68/0xf8
[ 1.327829] irq_thread+0x11c/0x234
[ 1.327833] kthread+0x13c/0x154
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Ward <DLG-Adam.Ward.opensource@dm.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221124-da9211-v2-0-1779e3c5d491@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cb3543cff9 upstream.
When updating the operating mode as part of regulator enable, the caller
has already locked the regulator tree and drms_uA_update() must not try
to do the same in order not to trigger a deadlock.
The lock inversion is reported by lockdep as:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-next-20221215 #142 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
udevd/154 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffc11f123d7e50 (regulator_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regulator_lock_dependent+0x54/0x280
but task is already holding lock:
ffff80000e4c36e8 (regulator_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: regulator_enable+0x34/0x80
which lock already depends on the new lock.
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
lock(regulator_ww_class_acquire);
lock(regulator_list_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
just before probe of a Qualcomm UFS controller (occasionally) deadlocks
when enabling one of its regulators.
Fixes: 9243a195be ("regulator: core: Change voltage setting path")
Fixes: f8702f9e4a ("regulator: core: Use ww_mutex for regulators locking")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221215104646.19818-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 8f3cbcd6b4 ]
Following by the below discussion, there's the potential UAF issue
between regulator and mfd.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221128143601.1698148-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com/
From the analysis of Yingliang
CPU A |CPU B
mt6370_probe() |
devm_mfd_add_devices() |
|mt6370_regulator_probe()
| regulator_register()
| //allocate init_data and add it to devres
| regulator_of_get_init_data()
i2c_unregister_device() |
device_del() |
devres_release_all() |
// init_data is freed |
release_nodes() |
| // using init_data causes UAF
| regulator_register()
It's common to use mfd core to create child device for the regulator.
In order to do the DT lookup for init data, the child that registered
the regulator would pass its parent as the parameter. And this causes
init data resource allocated to its parent, not itself. The issue happen
when parent device is going to release and regulator core is still doing
some operation of init data constraint for the regulator of child device.
To fix it, this patch expand 'regulator_register' API to use the
different devices for init data allocation and DT lookup.
Reported-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@richtek.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1670311341-32664-1-git-send-email-u0084500@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0591b14ce0 ]
I found a use_count leakage towards supply regulator of rdev with
boot-on option.
┌───────────────────┐ ┌───────────────────┐
│ regulator_dev A │ │ regulator_dev B │
│ (boot-on) │ │ (boot-on) │
│ use_count=0 │◀──supply──│ use_count=1 │
│ │ │ │
└───────────────────┘ └───────────────────┘
In case of rdev(A) configured with `regulator-boot-on', the use_count
of supplying regulator(B) will increment inside
regulator_enable(rdev->supply).
Thus, B will acts like always-on, and further balanced
regulator_enable/disable cannot actually disable it anymore.
However, B was also configured with `regulator-boot-on', we wish it
could be disabled afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <zr.zhang@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221201033806.2567812-1-zr.zhang@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f2b41b748c ]
I got the the following report:
OF: ERROR: memory leak, expected refcount 1 instead of 2,
of_node_get()/of_node_put() unbalanced - destroy cset entry:
attach overlay node /i2c/pmic@62/regulators/exten
In of_get_regulator(), the node is returned from of_parse_phandle()
with refcount incremented, after using it, of_node_put() need be called.
Fixes: 69511a452e ("regulator: map consumer regulator based on device tree")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221115091508.900752-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Pull regulator fixes from Mark Brown:
"This is more changes than I'd like this late although the diffstat is
still fairly small, I kept on holding off as new fixes came in to give
things time to soak in -next but should probably have tagged and sent
an additional pull request earlier.
There's some relatively large fixes to the twl6030 driver to fix
issues with the TWL6032 variant which resulted from some work on the
core TWL6030 driver, a couple of fixes for error handling paths
(mostly in the core), and a nice stability fix for the sgl51000 driver
that's been pulled out of a BSP"
* tag 'regulator-fix-v6.1-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator:
regulator: twl6030: fix get status of twl6032 regulators
regulator: twl6030: re-add TWL6032_SUBCLASS
regulator: slg51000: Wait after asserting CS pin
regulator: core: fix UAF in destroy_regulator()
regulator: rt5759: fix OOB in validate_desc()
regulator: core: fix kobject release warning and memory leak in regulator_register()
In former times, info->feature was populated via the parent driver
by pdata/regulator_init_data->driver_data for all regulators when
USB_PRODUCT_ID_LSB indicates a TWL6032.
Today, the information is not set, so re-add it at the regulator
definitions.
Fixes: 25d8233770 ("regulator: twl: make driver DT only")
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221120221208.3093727-2-andreas@kemnade.info
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
