commit 66fda75f47 upstream.
There are many places where ops->disable is called directly. Instead we
should use _regulator_do_disable() which also handles gpio regulators.
To be able to use the wrapper function from _regulator_force_disable(),
I moved the _notifier_call_chain() call from _regulator_do_disable() to
_regulator_disable(). This way, _regulator_force_disable() can use
different flags for _notifier_call_chain() without calling it twice.
Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 30c2197103 upstream.
There are some direct ops->enable in the regulator core driver. This is
a potential issue as the function _regulator_do_enable() handles gpio
regulators and the normal ops->enable calls. These gpio regulators are
simply ignored when ops->enable is called directly.
One possible bug is that boot-on and always-on gpio regulators are not
enabled on registration.
This patch replaces all ops->enable calls by _regulator_do_enable.
[Handle missing enable operations -- broonie]
Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cut down on the size of core.c a bit more and ensure that the devres
versions of things don't do too much peering inside the internals of
the APIs they wrap.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Conflicts:
drivers/regulator/Makefile
drivers/regulator/core.c
There is no need to use a normal per-CPU workqueue for delayed power downs
as they're not timing or performance critical and waking up a core for them
would defeat some of the point.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 070260f07c)
