__setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in
init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled.
A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown
kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) argument or environment
strings. Also, error return codes don't mean anything to
obsolete_checksetup() -- only non-zero (usually 1) or zero.
So return 1 from jive_mtdset().
Fixes: 9db829f485 ("[ARM] JIVE: Initial machine support for Logitech Jive")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: patches@armlinux.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Since commit 251cc826be ("ARM: 9154/1: decompressor: do not copy source
files while building"), the following three are rebuilt every time.
AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/lib1funcs.o
AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/ashldi3.o
AS arch/arm/boot/compressed/bswapsdi2.o
Move the "OBJS += ..." line up so these objects are added to 'targets'.
Fixes: 251cc826be ("ARM: 9154/1: decompressor: do not copy source files while building")
Reported-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
When splitting a value entry, we may need to add the new nodes to the LRU
list and remove the parent node from the LRU list. The WARN_ON checks
in shadow_lru_isolate() catch this oversight. This bug was latent
until we stopped splitting folios in shrink_page_list() with commit
820c4e2e6f ("mm/vmscan: Free non-shmem folios without splitting them").
That allows the creation of large shadow entries, and subsequently when
trying to page in a small page, we will split the large shadow entry
in __filemap_add_folio().
Fixes: 8fc75643c5 ("XArray: add xas_split")
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Instead of duplicating the fixed/downclock modes we can just grab
the originals straight from the probed_modes list and keep them.
The next .get_modes() is going to repopulate the probed_modes list
anyway so whatever we leave there is just going to sit around until
that time wasting memory. In fact let's clear out the probed modes
list entirely to make sure we get 100% consistent behaviour starting
already from the very first real .get_modes().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Rather than having the connector init get the fixed mode back from
intel_panel and then feed it straight back into intel_panel_init()
let's just make the fixed mode lookup put the mode directly onto
the panel's fixed_modes list. Avoids the pointless round trip and
opens the door for further enhancements to the fixed mode handling.
v2: Make the debug message correct by using intel_panel_drrs_type() (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220331112822.11462-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The rxrpc_call struct has a timer used to handle various timed events
relating to a call. This timer can get started from the packet input
routines that are run in softirq mode with just the RCU read lock held.
Unfortunately, because only the RCU read lock is held - and neither ref or
other lock is taken - the call can start getting destroyed at the same time
a packet comes in addressed to that call. This causes the timer - which
was already stopped - to get restarted. Later, the timer dispatch code may
then oops if the timer got deallocated first.
Fix this by trying to take a ref on the rxrpc_call struct and, if
successful, passing that ref along to the timer. If the timer was already
running, the ref is discarded.
The timer completion routine can then pass the ref along to the call's work
item when it queues it. If the timer or work item where already
queued/running, the extra ref is discarded.
Fixes: a158bdd324 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2022-March/005073.html
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164865115696.2943015.11097991776647323586.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
The invalid EDID block filtering uses the number of valid EDID
extensions instead of all EDID extensions for looping the extensions in
the copy. This is fine, by coincidence, if all the invalid blocks are at
the end of the EDID. However, it's completely broken if there are
invalid extensions in the middle; the invalid blocks are included and
valid blocks are excluded.
Fix it by modifying the base block after, not before, the copy.
Fixes: 14544d0937 ("drm/edid: Only print the bad edid when aborting")
Reported-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220330170426.349248-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
When user delete vlan 0, as driver will not delete vlan 0 for hardware in
function hclge_set_vlan_filter_hw(), so vlan 0 in software vlan talbe should
not be deleted.
Fixes: fe4144d47e ("net: hns3: sync VLAN filter entries when kill VLAN ID failed")
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Currently, the debugfs mechanism is that all functions share a
global variable to save the pointer for obtaining data. When
different functions concurrently access the same file node,
repeated release exceptions occur. Therefore, the granularity
of the pointer for storing the obtained data is adjusted to be
private for each function.
Fixes: 5e69ea7ee2 ("net: hns3: refactor the debugfs process")
Signed-off-by: Yufeng Mo <moyufeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Jakub Kicinski says:
====================
docs: update and move the netdev-FAQ
A section of documentation for tree-specific process quirks had
been created a while back. There's only one tree in it, so far,
the tip tree, but the contents seem to answer similar questions
as we answer in the netdev-FAQ. Move the netdev-FAQ.
Take this opportunity to touch up and update a few sections.
v3: remove some confrontational? language from patch 7
v2: remove non-git in patch 3
add patch 5
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220330042505.2902770-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
The documentation for the tip tree is really in quite a similar
spirit to the netdev-FAQ. Move the netdev-FAQ to the process docs
as well.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Convert the "should I use new or old comment formatting" to cover
all formatting. This makes the question itself shorter.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Add the most important case to the question about "where are we
in the cycle" - the case of net-next being closed.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
I think double back ticks are more correct. Add where they are missing.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
These days we often ask for selftests so let's update our
testing requirements.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
We have to tell people to stop reposting to often lately,
or not to repost while the discussion is ongoing.
Document this.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Make the question shorter and adjust the start of the answer accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
The semantics of "Under review" have shifted. Reword the question
about it a bit and focus it on the response time.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cut down the length of the question so it renders better in docs.
Mention that Message-ID can be used to search patchwork.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Use the sphinx Warning box to make the net-next being closed
stand out more.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
We want people to mark their patches with net and net-next in the subject.
Many miss doing that. Move the FAQ section which points that out up, and
place it after the section which enumerates the trees, that seems like
a pretty logical place for it. Since the two sections are together we
can remove a little bit (not too much) of the repetition.
v2: also remove the text for non-git setups, we want people to use git.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Most people use (or should use) lore at this point.
Replace the pointers to older archiving systems.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
The DRM_UT_STATE controls whether we're calling
drm_atomic_print_new_state() whenever a new state is committed. However,
that call is made in the drm_mode_atomic_ioctl(), whereas we have
multiple users of the drm_atomic_commit() function in the kernel
(framebuffer emulation, drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb, etc.).
This leads to multiple states being committed but never actually
displayed even though we asked to have verbose atomic state debugging.
Let's move the call to drm_atomic_print_new_state() to
drm_atomic_commit() to make sure we don't miss any. Non-blocking commits
were never logged though, and it would create too much churn in the logs
to do so, so leave them out for now.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220328124304.2309418-2-maxime@cerno.tech