All architecturally defined bits in the FPU implementation register
are read only & unchanging. It contains some implementation-defined
bits but the architecture manual states "This bits are explicitly not
intended to be used for mode control functions" which seems to provide
justification for viewing the register as a whole as unchanging. This
being the case we can simply re-use the value we read at boot rather
than having to re-read it later, and avoid the complexity which that
read entails.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6147/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
All architecturally defined bits in the FPU implementation register
are read only & unchanging. It contains some implementation-defined
bits but the architecture manual states "This bits are explicitly not
intended to be used for mode control functions" which seems to provide
justification for viewing the register as a whole as unchanging. This
being the case we can simply re-use the value we read at boot rather
than having to re-read it later, and avoid the complexity which that
read entails.
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@imgtec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6144/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
The sead3-mtd.o is built for obj-y -- and hence this code is always
present. It will never be modular, so using module_init as an alias
for __initcall can be somewhat misleading.
Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.
Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.
We also fix a missing semicolon, which this change uncovers.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: fengguang.wu@intel.com
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/6412/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
When gfs2_create_inode() fails due to quota violation, the VFS
inode is not completely uninitialized. This can cause a list
corruption error.
This patch correctly uninitializes the VFS inode when a quota
violation occurs in the gfs2_create_inode codepath.
Resolves: rhbz#1059808
Signed-off-by: Abhi Das <adas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
After reading a nice article on LWN[1], I went back and double checked
my handling of invalid-input checking. Turns out there were a couple
places I had missed.
Since the driver is fairly young, and the devices it supports are really
only just barely usable for basic stuff (serial console) with an
upstream kernel, I think we should fix this now and revert specific
parts of this patch later in the unlikely event that a regression is
reported.
[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/588444/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Some of the w/a or different behavior of userspace blob driver seem to
be keyed to gpu patch revision, rather than gpu-id. So expose the full
chip-id to userspace so it can DTRT.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Shut down the clks when the gpu has nothing to do. A short inactivity
timer is used to provide a low pass filter for power transitions.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
The pool is congested if the pool is in PM_OUT_OF_DATA_SPACE mode. This
is more explicit/clear/efficient than inferring whether or not the pool
is congested by checking if retry_on_resume_list is empty.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Remove the rest of the references to drm_i915_private_t. No functional
changes.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk in i915_cmd_parser.c]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This patch does not alter the binding at all it only brings the
documentation up to date with the existing binding.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The DSPs will often control there own clock speeds whilst running as
such we should mark the registers controlling this as volatile.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
The PM8xxx family of PMICs contain an RTC. This RTC is described as a
subnode of the PM8xxx. Document these bindings, and replace the pwrkey
node in the example with the RTC, which is now described in this
document.
While we're here, add a short description to the device tree bindings
describing what the the PM8xxx devices are and how they are expected to
be used.
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Allow locks_mandatory_area() to handle file-private locks correctly.
If there is a file-private lock set on an open file and we're doing I/O
via the same, then that should not cause anything to block.
Handle this by first doing a non-blocking FL_ACCESS check for a
file-private lock, and then fall back to checking for a classic POSIX
lock (and possibly blocking).
Note that this approach is subject to the same races that have always
plagued mandatory locking on Linux.
Reported-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
As Trond pointed out, you can currently deadlock yourself by setting a
file-private lock on a file that requires mandatory locking and then
trying to do I/O on it.
Avoid this problem by plumbing some knowledge of file-private locks into
the mandatory locking code. In order to do this, we must pass down
information about the struct file that's being used to
locks_verify_locked.
Reported-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Neil Brown suggested potentially overloading the l_pid value as a "lock
context" field for file-private locks. While I don't think we will
probably want to do that here, it's probably a good idea to ensure that
in the future we could extend this API without breaking existing
callers.
Typically the l_pid value is ignored for incoming struct flock
arguments, serving mainly as a place to return the pid of the owner if
there is a conflicting lock. For file-private locks, require that it
currently be set to 0 and return EINVAL if it isn't. If we eventually
want to make a non-zero l_pid mean something, then this will help ensure
that we don't break legacy programs that are using file-private locks.
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and
unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise
is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor
associated with the inode.
This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that
need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock
management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed
until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished.
Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks
taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one
another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads.
This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these
issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but
have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance
and behavior on close.
This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for
these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the
process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired.
Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the
last reference to a filp is put.
These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX
locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will
also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by
the same process or on the same file descriptor.
The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl()
syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to
"classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not
exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push
this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't
see any need for it.
Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only
available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to
add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
It's not really feasible to do deadlock detection with FL_FILE_PVT
locks since they aren't owned by a single task, per-se. Deadlock
detection also tends to be rather expensive so just skip it for
these sorts of locks.
Also, add a FIXME comment about adding more limited deadlock detection
that just applies to ro -> rw upgrades, per Andy's request.
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Once we introduce file private locks, we'll need to know what cmd value
was used, as that affects the ownership and whether a conflict would
arise.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
FL_FILE_PVT locks are no longer tied to a particular pid, and are
instead inheritable by child processes. Report a l_pid of '-1' for
these sorts of locks since the pid is somewhat meaningless for them.
This precedent comes from FreeBSD. There, POSIX and flock() locks can
conflict with one another. If fcntl(F_GETLK, ...) returns a lock set
with flock() then the l_pid member cannot be a process ID because the
lock is not held by a process as such.
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
In a later patch, we'll be adding a new type of lock that's owned by
the struct file instead of the files_struct. Those sorts of locks
will be flagged with a new FL_FILE_PVT flag.
Report these types of locks as "FLPVT" in /proc/locks to distinguish
them from "classic" POSIX locks.
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
This function currently removes leases in addition to flock locks and in
a later patch we'll have it deal with file-private locks too. Rename it
to locks_remove_file to indicate that it removes locks that are
associated with a particular struct file, and not just flock locks.
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Move this check into flock64_to_posix_lock instead of duplicating it in
two places. This also fixes a minor wart in the code where we continue
referring to the struct flock after converting it to struct file_lock.
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
