The history of i915_vma_close() is confusing, as is its use. As the
lifetime of the i915_vma is currently bounded by the object it is
attached to, we needed a means of identify when a vma was no longer in
use by userspace (via the user's fd). This is further complicated by
that only ppgtt vma should be closed at the user's behest, as the ggtt
were always shared.
Now that we attach the vma to a lut on the user's context, the open
count does indicate how many unique and open context/vm are referencing
this vma from the user. As such, we can and should just use the
open_count to track when the vma is still in use by userspace.
It's a poor man's replacement for reference counting.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1193
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200422190558.30509-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
driver already had psp_firmware_header struture to
deal with different layout of sos ucode. the sos
micorcode initialization could be common one.
Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
vmr ring is dedicated for sriov vf (i.e.guest driver
in sriov), which is general communication interface
between driver and psp fw accross all ip version.
it is not correct to make it as ip specific callback.
it is even worse to check specific tOS version per IP
version (like psp_v11/v12).
Signed-off-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: John Clements <john.clements@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
For chip like CHIP_OLAND with si enabled(amdgpu.si_support=1),
the amdgpu will expose pp_num_states to the /sys directory.
In this moment, read the pp_num_states file will excute the
amdgpu_get_pp_num_states func. In our case, the data hasn't
been initialized, so the kernel will access some ilegal
address, trigger the segmentfault and system will reboot soon:
uos@uos-PC:~$ cat /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:00.0/0000\:01\:00
.0/pp_num_states
Message from syslogd@uos-PC at Apr 22 09:26:20 ...
kernel:[ 82.154129] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP
This patch aims to fix this problem, avoid that reading file
triggers the kernel sementfault.
Signed-off-by: limingyu <limingyu@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: zhoubinbin <zhoubinbin@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c: In function amdgpu_job_submit:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c:148:26: warning: variable priority set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
commit 33abcb1f5a ("drm/amdgpu: set compute queue priority at mqd_init")
left behind this, remove it.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
According to the current kiq read register method,
there will be race condition when using KIQ to read
register if multiple clients want to read at same time
just like the expample below:
1. client-A start to read REG-0 throguh KIQ
2. client-A poll the seqno-0
3. client-B start to read REG-1 through KIQ
4. client-B poll the seqno-1
5. the kiq complete these two read operation
6. client-A to read the register at the wb buffer and
get REG-1 value
Therefore, use amdgpu_device_wb_get() to request reg_val_offs
for each kiq read register.
v2: fix the error remove
v3: fix the print typo
v4: remove unused variables
Signed-off-by: Yintian Tao <yttao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This reverts commit 6bb0942e8f.
Unfortunately it would appear that the rumors we've heard of sideband
message interleaving not being very well supported are true. On the
Lenovo ThinkPad Thunderbolt 3 dock that I have, interleaved messages
appear to just get dropped:
[drm:drm_dp_mst_wait_tx_reply [drm_kms_helper]] timedout msg send
00000000571ddfd0 2 1
[dp_mst] txmsg cur_offset=2 cur_len=2 seqno=1 state=SENT path_msg=1 dst=00
[dp_mst] type=ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES contents:
[dp_mst] port=2
DP descriptor for this hub:
OUI 90-cc-24 dev-ID SYNA3 HW-rev 1.0 SW-rev 3.12 quirks 0x0008
It would seem like as well that this is a somewhat well known issue in
the field. From section 5.4.2 of the DisplayPort 2.0 specification:
There are MST Sink/Branch devices in the field that do not handle
interleaved message transactions.
To facilitate message transaction handling by downstream devices, an
MST Source device shall generate message transactions in an atomic
manner (i.e., the MST Source device shall not concurrently interleave
multiple message transactions). Therefore, an MST Source device shall
clear the Message_Sequence_No value in the Sideband_MSG_Header to 0.
MST Source devices that support field policy updates by way of
software should update the policy to forego the generation of
interleaved message transactions.
This is a bit disappointing, as features like HDCP require that we send
a sideband request every ~2 seconds for each active stream. However,
there isn't really anything in the specification that allows us to
accurately probe for interleaved messages.
If it ends up being that we -really- need this in the future, we might
be able to whitelist hubs where interleaving is known to work-or maybe
try some sort of heuristics. But for now, let's just play it safe and
not use it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 6bb0942e8f ("drm/dp_mst: Remove single tx msg restriction.")
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200423164225.680178-1-lyude@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
intel_gt_wait_for_idle() tries to wait until all the outstanding requests
are retired and the GPU is idle. As a side effect of retiring requests,
we may submit more work to flush any pm barriers, and so the
wait-for-idle tries to flush the background pm work and catch the new
requests. However, if the work completed in the background before we
were able to flush, it would queue the extra barrier request without us
noticing -- and so we would return from wait-for-idle with one request
remaining. (This breaks e.g. record_default_state where we need to wait
until that barrier is retired, and it may slow suspend down by causing
us to wait on the background retirement worker as opposed to immediately
retiring the barrier.)
However, since we track if there has been a submission since the engine
pm barrier, we can very quickly detect if the idle barrier is still
outstanding.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1763
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200423085940.28168-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
During the virtual engine's submission tasklet, we take the request and
insert into the submission queue on each of our siblings. This seems
quite simply, and so no problems with ordering. However, the sibling
execlists' submission tasklets may run concurrently with the virtual
engine's tasklet, submitting the request to HW before the virtual
finishes its task of telling all the siblings. If this happens, the
sibling tasklet may *reorder* the ve->sibling[] array that the virtual
engine tasklet is processing. This can *only* reorder within the
elements already processed by the virtual engine, nevertheless the
race is detected by KCSAN:
[ 185.580014] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in execlists_dequeue [i915] / virtual_submission_tasklet [i915]
[ 185.580054]
[ 185.580076] write to 0xffff8881f1919860 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 2:
[ 185.580553] execlists_dequeue+0x6ad/0x1600 [i915]
[ 185.581044] __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x48/0x60 [i915]
[ 185.581517] execlists_submission_tasklet+0xd3/0x170 [i915]
[ 185.581554] tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x42/0x90
[ 185.581585] __do_softirq+0xc8/0x206
[ 185.581613] run_ksoftirqd+0x15/0x20
[ 185.581641] smpboot_thread_fn+0x15a/0x270
[ 185.581669] kthread+0x19a/0x1e0
[ 185.581695] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 185.581717]
[ 185.581736] read to 0xffff8881f1919860 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 0:
[ 185.582231] virtual_submission_tasklet+0x10e/0x5c0 [i915]
[ 185.582265] tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x42/0x90
[ 185.582291] __do_softirq+0xc8/0x206
[ 185.582315] run_ksoftirqd+0x15/0x20
[ 185.582340] smpboot_thread_fn+0x15a/0x270
[ 185.582368] kthread+0x19a/0x1e0
[ 185.582395] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 185.582417]
We can prevent this race by checking for the ve->request after looking
up the sibling array.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200423115315.26825-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
If set error query ready in amdgpu_ras_late_init, which will
cause some IP blocks aren't initialized, but their error query
is ready.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This is basically just some code cosmetic. The current design
for XGMI setup gput reset is to operate on current device(adev)
first and then on other devices from the hive(by another 'for' loop).
But actually we can do some sort to the device list(to put current
device 1st position) and handle all the devices in a single 'for'
loop.
V2: added missing hive->hive_lock protection
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
clean up unused variable:
1. ring_lru_list
2. ring_lru_list_lock
related-commit:
drm/amdgpu: remove ring lru handling
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wang <kevin1.wang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Prefix RAS message printing in gfx/mmhub with PCI device info,
which assists the debug in multiple GPU case.
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This is convenient for multiple teams to obtain the information. Also,
add device info by using dev_info().
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhao <Yong.Zhao@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
for different ASIC support different the number of DPM levels,
we should avoid to show the invalid level value.
v1 -> v2:
follow the suggestion,clarifiy the description for this
change
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuxian Dai <Yuxian.Dai@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
there's a bug in the new logic for panel power control. the check is
wrong, and will skip panel power control under the wrong conditions.
[How]
fix to check for NULL panel_cntl
Signed-off-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashley Thomas <Ashley.Thomas2@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
