Shared memory segments can be created that are backed by hugetlb pages.
When this happens, the vmas associated with any mappings (shmat) are
marked VM_HUGETLB, yet the vm_ops for such mappings are provided by
ipc/shm (shm_vm_ops). There is a mechanism to call the underlying hugetlb
vm_ops, and this is done for most operations. However, it is not done for
open and close.
This was not an issue until the introduction of the hugetlb vma_lock.
This lock structure is pointed to by vm_private_data and the open/close
vm_ops help maintain this structure. The special hugetlb routine called
at fork took care of structure updates at fork time. However,
vma_splitting is not properly handled for ipc shared memory mappings
backed by hugetlb pages. This can result in a "kernel NULL pointer
dereference" BUG or use after free as two vmas point to the same lock
structure.
Update the shm open and close routines to always call the underlying open
and close routines.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221114210018.49346-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Fixes: 8d9bfb2608 ("hugetlb: add vma based lock for pmd sharing")
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@intel.com>
Reported-by: <syzbot+83b4134621b7c326d950@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Syzbot reported the below splat:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at include/linux/gfp.h:221 __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:221 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at include/linux/gfp.h:221 hpage_collapse_alloc_page mm/khugepaged.c:807 [inline]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3646 at include/linux/gfp.h:221 alloc_charge_hpage+0x802/0xaa0 mm/khugepaged.c:963
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 3646 Comm: syz-executor210 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc1-syzkaller-00454-ga70385240892 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/11/2022
RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:221 [inline]
RIP: 0010:hpage_collapse_alloc_page mm/khugepaged.c:807 [inline]
RIP: 0010:alloc_charge_hpage+0x802/0xaa0 mm/khugepaged.c:963
Code: e5 01 4c 89 ee e8 6e f9 ae ff 4d 85 ed 0f 84 28 fc ff ff e8 70 fc ae ff 48 8d 6b ff 4c 8d 63 07 e9 16 fc ff ff e8 5e fc ae ff <0f> 0b e9 96 fa ff ff 41 bc 1a 00 00 00 e9 86 fd ff ff e8 47 fc ae
RSP: 0018:ffffc90003fdf7d8 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff888077f457c0 RSI: ffffffff81cd8f42 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffff888079388c0c R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 00007f6b48ccf700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9b00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f6b48a819f0 CR3: 00000000171e7000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
collapse_file+0x1ca/0x5780 mm/khugepaged.c:1715
hpage_collapse_scan_file+0xd6c/0x17a0 mm/khugepaged.c:2156
madvise_collapse+0x53a/0xb40 mm/khugepaged.c:2611
madvise_vma_behavior+0xd0a/0x1cc0 mm/madvise.c:1066
madvise_walk_vmas+0x1c7/0x2b0 mm/madvise.c:1240
do_madvise.part.0+0x24a/0x340 mm/madvise.c:1419
do_madvise mm/madvise.c:1432 [inline]
__do_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1432 [inline]
__se_sys_madvise mm/madvise.c:1430 [inline]
__x64_sys_madvise+0x113/0x150 mm/madvise.c:1430
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f6b48a4eef9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 b1 15 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f6b48ccf318 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000001c
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f6b48af0048 RCX: 00007f6b48a4eef9
RDX: 0000000000000019 RSI: 0000000000600003 RDI: 0000000020000000
RBP: 00007f6b48af0040 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f6b48aa53a4
R13: 00007f6b48bffcbf R14: 00007f6b48ccf400 R15: 0000000000022000
</TASK>
The khugepaged code would pick up the node with the most hit as the preferred
node, and also tries to do some balance if several nodes have the same
hit record. Basically it does conceptually:
* If the target_node <= last_target_node, then iterate from
last_target_node + 1 to MAX_NUMNODES (1024 on default config)
* If the max_value == node_load[nid], then target_node = nid
But there is a corner case, paritucularly for MADV_COLLAPSE, that the
non-existing node may be returned as preferred node.
Assuming the system has 2 nodes, the target_node is 0 and the
last_target_node is 1, if MADV_COLLAPSE path is hit, the max_value may
be 0, then it may return 2 for target_node, but it is actually not
existing (offline), so the warn is triggered.
The node balance was introduced by commit 9f1b868a13 ("mm: thp:
khugepaged: add policy for finding target node") to satisfy
"numactl --interleave=all". But interleaving is a mere hint rather than
something that has hard requirements.
So use nodemask to record the nodes which have the same hit record, the
hugepage allocation could fallback to those nodes. And remove
__GFP_THISNODE since it does disallow fallback. And if the nodemask
just has one node set, it means there is one single node has the most
hit record, the nodemask approach actually behaves like __GFP_THISNODE.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221108184357.55614-2-shy828301@gmail.com
Fixes: 7d8faaf155 ("mm/madvise: introduce MADV_COLLAPSE sync hugepage collapse")
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reported-by: <syzbot+0044b22d177870ee974f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
During proactive reclaim, we sometimes observe severe overreclaim, with
several thousand times more pages reclaimed than requested.
This trace was obtained from shrink_lruvec() during such an instance:
prio:0 anon_cost:1141521 file_cost:7767
nr_reclaimed:4387406 nr_to_reclaim:1047 (or_factor:4190)
nr=[7161123 345 578 1111]
While he reclaimer requested 4M, vmscan reclaimed close to 16G, most of it
by swapping. These requests take over a minute, during which the write()
to memory.reclaim is unkillably stuck inside the kernel.
Digging into the source, this is caused by the proportional reclaim
bailout logic. This code tries to resolve a fundamental conflict: to
reclaim roughly what was requested, while also aging all LRUs fairly and
in accordance to their size, swappiness, refault rates etc. The way it
attempts fairness is that once the reclaim goal has been reached, it stops
scanning the LRUs with the smaller remaining scan targets, and adjusts the
remainder of the bigger LRUs according to how much of the smaller LRUs was
scanned. It then finishes scanning that remainder regardless of the
reclaim goal.
This works fine if priority levels are low and the LRU lists are
comparable in size. However, in this instance, the cgroup that is
targeted by proactive reclaim has almost no files left - they've already
been squeezed out by proactive reclaim earlier - and the remaining anon
pages are hot. Anon rotations cause the priority level to drop to 0,
which results in reclaim targeting all of anon (a lot) and all of file
(almost nothing). By the time reclaim decides to bail, it has scanned
most or all of the file target, and therefor must also scan most or all of
the enormous anon target. This target is thousands of times larger than
the reclaim goal, thus causing the overreclaim.
The bailout code hasn't changed in years, why is this failing now? The
most likely explanations are two other recent changes in anon reclaim:
1. Before the series starting with commit 5df741963d ("mm: fix LRU
balancing effect of new transparent huge pages"), the VM was
overall relatively reluctant to swap at all, even if swap was
configured. This means the LRU balancing code didn't come into play
as often as it does now, and mostly in high pressure situations
where pronounced swap activity wouldn't be as surprising.
2. For historic reasons, shrink_lruvec() loops on the scan targets of
all LRU lists except the active anon one, meaning it would bail if
the only remaining pages to scan were active anon - even if there
were a lot of them.
Before the series starting with commit ccc5dc6734 ("mm/vmscan:
make active/inactive ratio as 1:1 for anon lru"), most anon pages
would live on the active LRU; the inactive one would contain only a
handful of preselected reclaim candidates. After the series, anon
gets aged similarly to file, and the inactive list is the default
for new anon pages as well, making it often the much bigger list.
As a result, the VM is now more likely to actually finish large
anon targets than before.
Change the code such that only one SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX-sized nudge toward the
larger LRU lists is made before bailing out on a met reclaim goal.
This fixes the extreme overreclaim problem.
Fairness is more subtle and harder to evaluate. No obvious misbehavior
was observed on the test workload, in any case. Conceptually, fairness
should primarily be a cumulative effect from regular, lower priority
scans. Once the VM is in trouble and needs to escalate scan targets to
make forward progress, fairness needs to take a backseat. This is also
acknowledged by the myriad exceptions in get_scan_count(). This patch
makes fairness decrease gradually, as it keeps fairness work static over
increasing priority levels with growing scan targets. This should make
more sense - although we may have to re-visit the exact values.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220802162811.39216-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currenty there is no upper limit for /proc/sys/vm/page-cluster, and it's a
bit shift value, so it could result in overflow of the 32-bit integer.
Add a reasonable upper limit for it, read-in at most 2**31 pages, which is
a large enough value for readahead.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221023162533.81561-1-ryncsn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Currently PageHWPoison flag does not behave well when experiencing memory
hotremove/hotplug. Any data field in struct page is unreliable when the
associated memory is offlined, and the current mechanism can't tell
whether a memory block is onlined because a new memory devices is
installed or because previous failed offline operations are undone.
Especially if there's a hwpoisoned memory, it's unclear what the best
option is.
So introduce a new mechanism to make struct memory_block remember that a
memory block has hwpoisoned memory inside it. And make any online event
fail if the onlining memory block contains hwpoison. struct memory_block
is freed and reallocated over ACPI-based hotremove/hotplug, but not over
sysfs-based hotremove/hotplug. So the new counter can distinguish these
cases.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221024062012.1520887-5-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When creating a virtual machine, we will use memfd_create() to get a file
descriptor which can be used to create share memory mappings using the
mmap function, meanwhile the mmap() will set the MAP_POPULATE flag to
allocate physical pages for the virtual machine.
When allocating physical pages for the guest, the host can fallback to
allocate some CMA pages for the guest when over half of the zone's free
memory is in the CMA area.
In guest os, when the application wants to do some data transaction with
DMA, our QEMU will call VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA ioctl to do longterm-pin and
create IOMMU mappings for the DMA pages. However, when calling
VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA ioctl to pin the physical pages, we found it will be
failed to longterm-pin sometimes.
After some invetigation, we found the pages used to do DMA mapping can
contain some CMA pages, and these CMA pages will cause a possible failure
of the longterm-pin, due to failed to migrate the CMA pages. The reason
of migration failure may be temporary reference count or memory allocation
failure. So that will cause the VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA ioctl returns error,
which makes the application failed to start.
I observed one migration failure case (which is not easy to reproduce) is
that, the 'thp_migration_fail' count is 1 and the 'thp_split_page_failed'
count is also 1.
That means when migrating a THP which is in CMA area, but can not allocate
a new THP due to memory fragmentation, so it will split the THP. However
THP split is also failed, probably the reason is temporary reference count
of this THP. And the temporary reference count can be caused by dropping
page caches (I observed the drop caches operation in the system), but we
can not drop the shmem page caches due to they are already dirty at that
time.
Especially for THP split failure, which is caused by temporary reference
count, we can try again to mitigate the failure of migration in this case
according to previous discussion [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/470dc638-a300-f261-94b4-e27250e42f96@redhat.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6784730480a1df82e8f4cba1ed088e4ac767994b.1666599848.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Syzkaller reports a null-ptr-deref bug as follows:
======================================================
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
RIP: 0010:hugetlbfs_parse_param+0x1dd/0x8e0 fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:1380
[...]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
vfs_parse_fs_param fs/fs_context.c:148 [inline]
vfs_parse_fs_param+0x1f9/0x3c0 fs/fs_context.c:129
vfs_parse_fs_string+0xdb/0x170 fs/fs_context.c:191
generic_parse_monolithic+0x16f/0x1f0 fs/fs_context.c:231
do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:3036 [inline]
path_mount+0x12de/0x1e20 fs/namespace.c:3370
do_mount fs/namespace.c:3383 [inline]
__do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline]
__se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline]
__x64_sys_mount+0x27f/0x300 fs/namespace.c:3568
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
[...]
</TASK>
======================================================
According to commit "vfs: parse: deal with zero length string value",
kernel will set the param->string to null pointer in vfs_parse_fs_string()
if fs string has zero length.
Yet the problem is that, hugetlbfs_parse_param() will dereference the
param->string, without checking whether it is a null pointer. To be more
specific, if hugetlbfs_parse_param() parses an illegal mount parameter,
such as "size=,", kernel will constructs struct fs_parameter with null
pointer in vfs_parse_fs_string(), then passes this struct fs_parameter to
hugetlbfs_parse_param(), which triggers the above null-ptr-deref bug.
This patch solves it by adding sanity check on param->string
in hugetlbfs_parse_param().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221020231609.4810-1-yin31149@gmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+a3e6acd85ded5c16a709@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a3e6acd85ded5c16a709@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0000000000005ad00405eb7148c6@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Hawkins Jiawei <yin31149@gmail.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm: Use hotplug_memory_notifier() instead of
register_hotmemory_notifier()", v4.
Commit f02c696800 ("include/linux/memory.h: implement
register_hotmemory_notifier()") introduced register_hotmemory_notifier()
to avoid a compile problem with gcc-4.4.4:
When CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=n, we don't want the memory-hotplug notifier
handlers to be included in the .o files, for space reasons.
The existing hotplug_memory_notifier() tries to handle this but testing
with gcc-4.4.4 shows that it doesn't work - the hotplug functions are
still present in the .o files.
Since commit 76ae847497 ("Documentation: raise minimum supported
version of GCC to 5.1") has already updated the minimum gcc version to
5.1. The previous problem mentioned in f02c696800 does not exist. So
we can now revert to use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly rather than
register_hotmemory_notifier().
In the last patch, we move all hotplug memory notifier priority to same
file for easy sorting.
This patch (of 8):
Commit 76ae847497 ("Documentation: raise minimum supported version of
GCC to 5.1") updated the minimum gcc version to 5.1. So the problem
mentioned in f02c696800 ("include/linux/memory.h: implement
register_hotmemory_notifier()") no longer exist. So we can now switch to
use hotplug_memory_notifier() directly rather than
register_hotmemory_notifier().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220923033347.3935160-1-liushixin2@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220923033347.3935160-2-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: zefan li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
