PHYLINK being designed with PHYs in mind that can change MII protocol,
for correct operation it is necessary to ensure that the PHY interface
mode stays the same (otherwise clear the supported bit mask, as
required).
Because this is just a hypothetical situation for now, we don't bother
to check whether we could actually support the new PHY interface mode.
Actually we could modify the xMII table, reset the switch and send an
updated static configuration, but adding that would just be dead code.
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
It has been pointed out that PHYLINK can call mac_config only to update
the phy_interface_type and without knowing what the AN results are.
Experimentally, when this was observed to happen, state->link was also
unset, and therefore was used as a proxy to ignore this call. However it
is also suggested that state->link is undefined for this callback and
should not be relied upon.
So let the previously-dead codepath for SPEED_UNKNOWN be called, and
update the comment to make sure the MAC's behavior is sane.
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
On 32-bit architectures, putting an array of 256 u32 values on the
stack uses more space than the warning limit:
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c: In function 'hinic_rss_init':
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c:286:1: error: the frame size of 1068 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
I considered changing the code to use u8 values here, since that's
all the hardware supports, but dynamically allocating the array is
a more isolated fix here.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Jose Abreu says:
====================
net: stmmac: 10GbE using XGMAC
Support for 10Gb Link using XGMAC core plus some performance tweaks.
Tested in a PCI based setup.
iperf3 TCP results:
TSO ON, MTU=1500, TX Queues = 1, RX Queues = 1, Flow Control ON
Pinned CPU (-A), Zero-Copy (-Z)
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-600.00 sec 643 GBytes 9.21 Gbits/sec 1 sender
[ 5] 0.00-600.00 sec 643 GBytes 9.21 Gbits/sec receiver
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently, stmmac only supports 32 bits addressing for SKB. Enable the
support for upto 48 bits addressing in XGMAC core.
This avoids the use of bounce buffers and increases performance.
Changes from v1:
- Fallback to 32 bits in failure (Andrew)
Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>
Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Kalle Valo says:
====================
wireless-drivers fixes for 5.2
Hopefully the last set of fixes for 5.2. Nothing special this around,
only small fixes and support for new cards.
iwlwifi
* add new cards for 22000 series and smaller fixes
wl18xx
* fix a clang warning about unused variables
mwifiex
* properly handle small vendor IEs (a regression from the recent
security fix)
ath
* fix few SPDX tags
mt76
* fix A-MSDU aggregation which got broken in v5.2-rc1
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch allows reading and writing the input voltage and current
limit through the POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_INPUT_VOLTAGE_LIMIT and
POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_INPUT_CURRENT_LIMIT sysfs properties. This allows
userspace to see current values and to re-configure these values at
runtime based on system-level knowledge or user input.
By default there is no limit, this is reported as a -1 when reading from
userspace. Writing a value will set the current or voltage limit in uA
or uV, and writing any negative value will remove that limit.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
For thermal management strategy you might be interested on limit the
input power for a power supply. We already have current limit but
basically what we probably want is to limit power. So, introduce the
input_power_limit property.
Although the common use case is limit the input power, in some
specific cases it is the voltage that is problematic (i.e some regulators
have different efficiencies at higher voltage resulting in more heat).
So introduce also the input_voltage_limit property.
This happens in one Chromebook and is used on the Pixel C's thermal
management strategy to effectively limit the input power to 5V 3A when
the screen is on. When the screen is on, the display, the CPU, and the GPU
all contribute more heat to the system than while the screen is off, and
we made a tradeoff to throttle the charger in order to give more of the
thermal budget to those other components.
So there's nothing fundamentally broken about the hardware that would
cause the Pixel C to malfunction if we were charging at 9V or 12V instead
of 5V when the screen is on, i.e. if userspace doesn't change this.
What would happen is that you wouldn't meet Google's skin temperature
targets on the system if the charger was allowed to run at 9V or 12V with
the screen on.
For folks hacking on Pixel Cs (which is now outside of Google's official
support window for Android) and customizing their own kernel and userspace
this would be acceptable, but we wanted to expose this feature in the
power supply properties because the feature does exist in the Emedded
Controller firmware of the Pixel C and all of Google's Chromebooks with
USB-C made since 2015 in case someone running an up to date kernel wanted
to limit the charging power for thermal or other reasons.
This patch exposes a new property, similar to input current limit, to
re-configure the maximum voltage from the external supply at runtime
based on system-level knowledge or user input.
Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
In the case where a record marker was used, xs_sendpages() needs
to return the length of the payload + record marker so that we
operate correctly in the case of a partial transmission.
When the callers check return value, they therefore need to
take into account the record marker length.
Fixes: 06b5fc3ad9 ("Merge tag 'nfs-rdma-for-5.1-1'...")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
This adds the vid:pid of the isodebug v1 isolated JTAG/SWD+UART. Only the
second channel is available for use as a serial port.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@unjo.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
The UP.rst file calls for locks acquired within RCU callback functions
to use _irq variants (spin_lock_irqsave() or similar), which does work,
but can be overkill. This commit therefore instead calls for _bh variants
(spin_lock_bh() or similar), while noting that _irq does work.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The current ReStructuredText formatting results in "--", used to
indicate the end of the kernel command-line parameters, appearing as
an en-dash instead of two hyphens; this patch formats them as code,
"``--``", as done elsewhere in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
fix the disjunction by replacing "of" with "or".
Signed-off-by: Sheriff Esseson <sheriffesseson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
On umount step a sigkill signal is set (without user specific
action), due to sigkill signal the completion will be interrupted and
the data transfer can't be finished if a sync is needed.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This patch adds description of dma properties (optional).
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 64ee5067cf ("ASoC: soc-utils: remove dummy Platform") removed
dummy Platform from ALSA SoC, but it is over-kill.
This patch respawn it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 961fb3c206 ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 961fb3c206 ("ASoC: rockchip: rk3399_gru_sound: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 0814c64129 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 0814c64129 ("ASoC: qcom: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 6f04374457 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 6f04374457 ("ASoC: simple-card-utils: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 9ae6cdb184 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 9ae6cdb184 ("ASoC: ux500: mop500: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit f0edc6c1ee ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit f0edc6c1ee ("ASoC: ti: rx51: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit bfe1273c65 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit bfe1273c65 ("ASoC: ti: omap-twl4030: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit edba13aeae ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit edba13aeae ("ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 1306ab2edd ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 1306ab2edd ("ASoC: ti: omap-abe-twl6040: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit f46da1b904 ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit f46da1b904 ("ASoC: ti: davinci-evm: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 567b374d99 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 567b374d99 ("ASoC: tegra: trimslice: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 5d62677238 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 5d62677238 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm9712: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit b28d985271 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit b28d985271 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8903: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 404b229b84 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 404b229b84 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_wm8753: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit cee1cf3f9f ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit cee1cf3f9f ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_sgtl5000: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit d035d13b22 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit d035d13b22 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5677: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 1d641e1523 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 1d641e1523 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_rt5640: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 4bfd08540b ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 4bfd08540b ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_max98090: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit e7fc99e641 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit e7fc99e641 ("ASoC: tegra: tegra_alc5632: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit 3f780533ba ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 3f780533ba ("ASoC: sunxi: sun4i-codec: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
commit e562a5f13c ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary
Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit e562a5f13c ("ASoC: sirf: sirf-audio: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
