[ Upstream commit acaab7335b ]
The zlib inflate code has an old micro-optimization based on the
assumption that for pre-increment memory accesses, the compiler will
generate code that fits better into the processor's pipeline than what
would be generated for post-increment memory accesses.
This optimization was already removed in upstream zlib in 2016:
https://github.com/madler/zlib/commit/9aaec95e8211
This optimization causes UB according to C99, which says in section 6.5.6
"Additive operators": "If both the pointer operand and the result point to
elements of the same array object, or one past the last element of the
array object, the evaluation shall not produce an overflow; otherwise, the
behavior is undefined".
This UB is not only a theoretical concern, but can also cause trouble for
future work on compiler-based sanitizers.
According to the zlib commit, this optimization also is not optimal
anymore with modern compilers.
Replace uses of OFF, PUP and UP_UNALIGNED with their definitions in the
POSTINC case, and remove the macro definitions, just like in the upstream
patch.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200507123112.252723-1-jannh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 18f1ca4685 ]
When building 64r6_defconfig with CONFIG_MIPS32_O32 disabled and
CONFIG_CRYPTO_RSA enabled:
lib/mpi/generic_mpih-mul1.c:37:24: error: invalid use of a cast in a
inline asm context requiring an l-value: remove the cast
or build with -fheinous-gnu-extensions
umul_ppmm(prod_high, prod_low, s1_ptr[j], s2_limb);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/mpi/longlong.h:664:22: note: expanded from macro 'umul_ppmm'
: "=d" ((UDItype)(w0))
~~~~~~~~~~^~~
lib/mpi/generic_mpih-mul1.c:37:13: error: invalid use of a cast in a
inline asm context requiring an l-value: remove the cast
or build with -fheinous-gnu-extensions
umul_ppmm(prod_high, prod_low, s1_ptr[j], s2_limb);
~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/mpi/longlong.h:668:22: note: expanded from macro 'umul_ppmm'
: "=d" ((UDItype)(w1))
~~~~~~~~~~^~~
2 errors generated.
This special case for umul_ppmm for MIPS64r6 was added in
commit bbc25bee37 ("lib/mpi: Fix umul_ppmm() for MIPS64r6"), due to
GCC being inefficient and emitting a __multi3 intrinsic.
There is no such issue with clang; with this patch applied, I can build
this configuration without any problems and there are no link errors
like mentioned in the commit above (which I can still reproduce with
GCC 9.3.0 when that commit is reverted). Only use this definition when
GCC is being used.
This really should have been caught by commit b0c091ae04 ("lib/mpi:
Eliminate unused umul_ppmm definitions for MIPS") when I was messing
around in this area but I was not testing 64-bit MIPS at the time.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/885
Reported-by: Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit af700eaed0 upstream.
objtool points out several conditions that it does not like, depending
on the combination with other configuration options and compiler
variants:
stack protector:
lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch()+0xbf: call to __stack_chk_fail() with UACCESS enabled
lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1()+0xbe: call to __stack_chk_fail() with UACCESS enabled
stackleak plugin:
lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch()+0x4a: call to stackleak_track_stack() with UACCESS enabled
lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1()+0x4a: call to stackleak_track_stack() with UACCESS enabled
kasan:
lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch()+0x25: call to memcpy() with UACCESS enabled
lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1()+0x25: call to memcpy() with UACCESS enabled
The stackleak and kasan options just need to be disabled for this file
as we do for other files already. For the stack protector, we already
attempt to disable it, but this fails on clang because the check is
mixed with the gcc specific -fno-conserve-stack option. According to
Andrey Ryabinin, that option is not even needed, dropping it here fixes
the stackprotector issue.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722125139.1335385-1-arnd@arndb.de
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190617123109.667090-1-arnd@arndb.de/t/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190722091050.2188664-1-arnd@arndb.de/t/
Fixes: d08965a27e ("x86/uaccess, ubsan: Fix UBSAN vs. SMAP")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit d08965a27e upstream.
UBSAN can insert extra code in random locations; including AC=1
sections. Typically this code is not safe and needs wrapping.
So far, only __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch* have been observed in AC=1
sections and therefore only those are annotated.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
[stable backport: only take the lib/Makefile change to resolve gcc-10
build issues]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c42b65e363 upstream.
A lot of code become ugly because of open coding allocations for bitmaps.
Introduce three helpers to allow users be more clear of intention
and keep their code neat.
Note, due to multiple circular dependencies we may not provide
the helpers as inliners. For now we keep them exported and, perhaps,
at some point in the future we will sort out header inclusion and
inheritance.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit ab9bb6318b ]
Commit dfe2a77fd2 ("kfifo: fix kfifo_alloc() and kfifo_init()") made
the kfifo code round the number of elements up. That was good for
__kfifo_alloc(), but it's actually wrong for __kfifo_init().
The difference? __kfifo_alloc() will allocate the rounded-up number of
elements, but __kfifo_init() uses an allocation done by the caller. We
can't just say "use more elements than the caller allocated", and have
to round down.
The good news? All the normal cases will be using power-of-two arrays
anyway, and most users of kfifo's don't use kfifo_init() at all, but one
of the helper macros to declare a KFIFO that enforce the proper
power-of-two behavior. But it looks like at least ibmvscsis might be
affected.
The bad news? Will Deacon refers to an old thread and points points out
that the memory ordering in kfifo's is questionable. See
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181211034032.32338-1-yuleixzhang@tencent.com/
for more.
Fixes: dfe2a77fd2 ("kfifo: fix kfifo_alloc() and kfifo_init()")
Reported-by: laokz <laokz@foxmail.com>
Cc: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9dea44c914 ]
devm_ioremap_resource() does not currently take 'const' arguments,
which results in a warning from the first driver trying to do it
anyway:
drivers/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.c: In function 'amd_fch_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-amd-fch.c:171:49: error: passing argument 2 of 'devm_ioremap_resource' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, &amd_fch_gpio_iores);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Change the prototype to allow it, as there is no real reason not to.
Fixes: 9bb2e0452508 ("gpio: amd: Make resource struct const")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190628150049.1108048-1-arnd@arndb.de
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviwed-By: Enrico Weigelt <info@metux.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
