[ Upstream commit 5c251e9dc0 ]
This is in preparation for maintaining signal_pending() as the decider of
whether or not a schedule() loop should be broken, or continue sleeping.
This is different than the core signal use cases, which really need to know
whether an actual signal is pending or not. task_sigpending() returns
non-zero if TIF_SIGPENDING is set.
Only core kernel use cases should care about the distinction between
the two, make sure those use the task_sigpending() helper.
Change-Id: I0d8572e173cc4536673da1682c9537db11f68167
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201026203230.386348-2-axboe@kernel.dk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 52cfde6bbf)
Bug: 268174392
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@google.com>
ec6f3fc90a