mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-11 05:17:10 +09:00
Btrfs: send, don't error in the presence of subvols/snapshots
commit 1af56070e3 upstream.
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.
Steps to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
mkdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
rmdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data
A test case for xfstests follows.
Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
1b524a36f1
commit
1a7fc2e61a
@@ -1628,6 +1628,10 @@ static int lookup_dir_item_inode(struct btrfs_root *root,
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
btrfs_dir_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], di, &key);
|
||||
if (key.type == BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY) {
|
||||
ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
*found_inode = key.objectid;
|
||||
*found_type = btrfs_dir_type(path->nodes[0], di);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user