mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 18:41:58 +09:00
fuse: fix blocked_waitq wakeup
commit908a572b80upstream. Using waitqueue_active() is racy. Make sure we issue a wake_up() unconditionally after storing into fc->blocked. After that it's okay to optimize with waitqueue_active() since the first wake up provides the necessary barrier for all waiters, not the just the woken one. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Fixes:3c18ef8117("fuse: optimize wake_up") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.10 Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
569fda5c01
commit
1ed087a7d7
@@ -391,12 +391,19 @@ static void request_end(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct fuse_req *req)
|
||||
if (test_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
clear_bit(FR_BACKGROUND, &req->flags);
|
||||
if (fc->num_background == fc->max_background)
|
||||
if (fc->num_background == fc->max_background) {
|
||||
fc->blocked = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wake up next waiter, if any */
|
||||
if (!fc->blocked && waitqueue_active(&fc->blocked_waitq))
|
||||
wake_up(&fc->blocked_waitq);
|
||||
} else if (!fc->blocked) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Wake up next waiter, if any. It's okay to use
|
||||
* waitqueue_active(), as we've already synced up
|
||||
* fc->blocked with waiters with the wake_up() call
|
||||
* above.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (waitqueue_active(&fc->blocked_waitq))
|
||||
wake_up(&fc->blocked_waitq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (fc->num_background == fc->congestion_threshold && fc->sb) {
|
||||
clear_bdi_congested(fc->sb->s_bdi, BLK_RW_SYNC);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user