arm64: reduce el2_setup branching

commit 3ad47d055a upstream.

The early el2_setup code is a little convoluted, with two branches where
one would do. This makes the code more painful to read than is
necessary.

We can remove a branch and simplify the logic by moving the early return
in the booted-at-EL1 case earlier in the function. This separates it
from all the setup logic that only makes sense for EL2.

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mark Rutland
2022-01-07 12:43:33 -07:00
committed by Chris
parent 12d01c29f9
commit 384b79bd4e

View File

@@ -490,13 +490,8 @@ ENTRY(el2_setup)
msr SPsel, #1 // We want to use SP_EL{1,2}
mrs x0, CurrentEL
cmp x0, #CurrentEL_EL2
b.ne 1f
mrs x0, sctlr_el2
CPU_BE( orr x0, x0, #(1 << 25) ) // Set the EE bit for EL2
CPU_LE( bic x0, x0, #(1 << 25) ) // Clear the EE bit for EL2
msr sctlr_el2, x0
b 2f
1: mrs x0, sctlr_el1
b.eq 1f
mrs x0, sctlr_el1
CPU_BE( orr x0, x0, #(3 << 24) ) // Set the EE and E0E bits for EL1
CPU_LE( bic x0, x0, #(3 << 24) ) // Clear the EE and E0E bits for EL1
msr sctlr_el1, x0
@@ -504,7 +499,11 @@ CPU_LE( bic x0, x0, #(3 << 24) ) // Clear the EE and E0E bits for EL1
isb
ret
2:
1: mrs x0, sctlr_el2
CPU_BE( orr x0, x0, #(1 << 25) ) // Set the EE bit for EL2
CPU_LE( bic x0, x0, #(1 << 25) ) // Clear the EE bit for EL2
msr sctlr_el2, x0
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_VHE
/*
* Check for VHE being present. For the rest of the EL2 setup,