mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-06 19:08:57 +09:00
pwm: tegra: Increase precision in PWM rate calculation
[ Upstream commit 250b76f43f ]
The rate of the PWM calculated as follows:
hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz;
This has the precision loss in lower PWM rate.
Change this to have more precision as:
hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(NSEC_PER_SEC * 100, period_ns);
rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * 100, hz)
Example:
1. period_ns = 16672000, PWM clock rate is 200 KHz.
Based on old formula
hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns
= 1000000000ul/16672000
= 59 (59.98)
rate = (200K + 59/2)/59 = 3390
Based on new method:
hz = 5998
rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSE(200000*100, 5998) = 3334
If we measure the PWM signal rate, we will get more accurate
period with rate value of 3334 instead of 3390.
2. period_ns = 16803898, PWM clock rate is 200 KHz.
Based on old formula:
hz = 59, rate = 3390
Based on new formula:
hz = 5951, rate = 3360
The PWM signal rate of 3360 is more near to requested period
than 3333.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
176bee4cfc
commit
51dd2600cc
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
||||
struct tegra_pwm_chip *pc = to_tegra_pwm_chip(chip);
|
||||
unsigned long long c;
|
||||
unsigned long rate, hz;
|
||||
unsigned long long ns100 = NSEC_PER_SEC;
|
||||
u32 val = 0;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -87,9 +88,11 @@ static int tegra_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
||||
* cycles at the PWM clock rate will take period_ns nanoseconds.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rate = clk_get_rate(pc->clk) >> PWM_DUTY_WIDTH;
|
||||
hz = NSEC_PER_SEC / period_ns;
|
||||
|
||||
rate = (rate + (hz / 2)) / hz;
|
||||
/* Consider precision in PWM_SCALE_WIDTH rate calculation */
|
||||
ns100 *= 100;
|
||||
hz = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(ns100, period_ns);
|
||||
rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(rate * 100, hz);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since the actual PWM divider is the register's frequency divider
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user