net/mlx5e: Enable adding peer miss rules only if merged eswitch is supported

[ Upstream commit 6cec0229ab ]

The cited commit creates peer miss group during switchdev mode
initialization in order to handle miss packets correctly while in VF
LAG mode. This is done regardless of FW support of such groups which
could cause rules setups failure later on.

Fix by adding FW capability check before creating peer groups/rule.

Fixes: ac004b8321 ("net/mlx5e: E-Switch, Add peer miss rules")
Signed-off-by: Maor Dickman <maord@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Maor Dickman
2020-08-05 17:56:04 +03:00
committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 825fc3167c
commit 5b609d8e5b

View File

@@ -1143,36 +1143,38 @@ static int esw_create_offloads_fdb_tables(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int nvports)
}
esw->fdb_table.offloads.send_to_vport_grp = g;
/* create peer esw miss group */
memset(flow_group_in, 0, inlen);
if (MLX5_CAP_ESW(esw->dev, merged_eswitch)) {
/* create peer esw miss group */
memset(flow_group_in, 0, inlen);
esw_set_flow_group_source_port(esw, flow_group_in);
esw_set_flow_group_source_port(esw, flow_group_in);
if (!mlx5_eswitch_vport_match_metadata_enabled(esw)) {
match_criteria = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_flow_group_in,
flow_group_in,
match_criteria);
if (!mlx5_eswitch_vport_match_metadata_enabled(esw)) {
match_criteria = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_flow_group_in,
flow_group_in,
match_criteria);
MLX5_SET_TO_ONES(fte_match_param, match_criteria,
misc_parameters.source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id);
MLX5_SET_TO_ONES(fte_match_param, match_criteria,
misc_parameters.source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id);
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in,
source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id_valid, 1);
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in,
source_eswitch_owner_vhca_id_valid, 1);
}
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, start_flow_index, ix);
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, end_flow_index,
ix + esw->total_vports - 1);
ix += esw->total_vports;
g = mlx5_create_flow_group(fdb, flow_group_in);
if (IS_ERR(g)) {
err = PTR_ERR(g);
esw_warn(dev, "Failed to create peer miss flow group err(%d)\n", err);
goto peer_miss_err;
}
esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_grp = g;
}
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, start_flow_index, ix);
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, end_flow_index,
ix + esw->total_vports - 1);
ix += esw->total_vports;
g = mlx5_create_flow_group(fdb, flow_group_in);
if (IS_ERR(g)) {
err = PTR_ERR(g);
esw_warn(dev, "Failed to create peer miss flow group err(%d)\n", err);
goto peer_miss_err;
}
esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_grp = g;
/* create miss group */
memset(flow_group_in, 0, inlen);
MLX5_SET(create_flow_group_in, flow_group_in, match_criteria_enable,
@@ -1206,7 +1208,8 @@ static int esw_create_offloads_fdb_tables(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, int nvports)
miss_rule_err:
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.miss_grp);
miss_err:
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_grp);
if (MLX5_CAP_ESW(esw->dev, merged_eswitch))
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_grp);
peer_miss_err:
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.send_to_vport_grp);
send_vport_err:
@@ -1229,7 +1232,8 @@ static void esw_destroy_offloads_fdb_tables(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
mlx5_del_flow_rules(esw->fdb_table.offloads.miss_rule_multi);
mlx5_del_flow_rules(esw->fdb_table.offloads.miss_rule_uni);
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.send_to_vport_grp);
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_grp);
if (MLX5_CAP_ESW(esw->dev, merged_eswitch))
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.peer_miss_grp);
mlx5_destroy_flow_group(esw->fdb_table.offloads.miss_grp);
mlx5_destroy_flow_table(esw->fdb_table.offloads.slow_fdb);