UPSTREAM: drm/ttm: fix ttm_bo_wait

reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu() should enable signaling even with a
zero timeout, but ttm_bo_wait() can also be called from atomic context and
then it is not a good idea to do this.

Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
  [sumits: fix checkpatch warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-3-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
(cherry picked from commit 98a6dd909b)

Change-Id: I142f7a853c9f6b16567531d7c332ba9f99325ec2
Signed-off-by: Marissa Wall <marissaw@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christian König
2016-11-07 16:16:15 -05:00
committed by Marissa Wall
parent b9aad97657
commit 71773989fe

View File

@@ -1602,7 +1602,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_unmap_virtual);
int ttm_bo_wait(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
bool interruptible, bool no_wait)
{
long timeout = no_wait ? 0 : 15 * HZ;
long timeout = 15 * HZ;
if (no_wait) {
if (reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(bo->resv, true))
return 0;
else
return -EBUSY;
}
timeout = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(bo->resv, true,
interruptible, timeout);