mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-02 01:06:46 +09:00
user per registers vs. ptrace single stepping
commita45aff5285upstream. git commit5e9a2692"[S390] ptrace cleanup" introduced a regression for the case when both a user PER set (e.g. a storage alteration trace) and PTRACE_SINGLESTEP are active. The new code will overrule the user PER set with a instruction-fetch PER set over the whole address space for ptrace single stepping. The inferior process will be stopped after each instruction with an instruction fetch event. Any other events that may have occurred concurrently are not reported (e.g. storage alteration event) because the control bits for them are not set. The solution is to merge the PER control bits of the user PER set with the PER_EVENT_IFETCH control bit for PTRACE_SINGLESTEP. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
715afafe87
commit
98ef836b07
@@ -47,29 +47,31 @@ enum s390_regset {
|
||||
|
||||
void update_per_regs(struct task_struct *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static const struct per_regs per_single_step = {
|
||||
.control = PER_EVENT_IFETCH,
|
||||
.start = 0,
|
||||
.end = PSW_ADDR_INSN,
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(task);
|
||||
struct thread_struct *thread = &task->thread;
|
||||
const struct per_regs *new;
|
||||
struct per_regs old;
|
||||
struct per_regs old, new;
|
||||
|
||||
/* TIF_SINGLE_STEP overrides the user specified PER registers. */
|
||||
new = test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SINGLE_STEP) ?
|
||||
&per_single_step : &thread->per_user;
|
||||
/* Copy user specified PER registers */
|
||||
new.control = thread->per_user.control;
|
||||
new.start = thread->per_user.start;
|
||||
new.end = thread->per_user.end;
|
||||
|
||||
/* merge TIF_SINGLE_STEP into user specified PER registers. */
|
||||
if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_SINGLE_STEP)) {
|
||||
new.control |= PER_EVENT_IFETCH;
|
||||
new.start = 0;
|
||||
new.end = PSW_ADDR_INSN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Take care of the PER enablement bit in the PSW. */
|
||||
if (!(new->control & PER_EVENT_MASK)) {
|
||||
if (!(new.control & PER_EVENT_MASK)) {
|
||||
regs->psw.mask &= ~PSW_MASK_PER;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
regs->psw.mask |= PSW_MASK_PER;
|
||||
__ctl_store(old, 9, 11);
|
||||
if (memcmp(new, &old, sizeof(struct per_regs)) != 0)
|
||||
__ctl_load(*new, 9, 11);
|
||||
if (memcmp(&new, &old, sizeof(struct per_regs)) != 0)
|
||||
__ctl_load(new, 9, 11);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *task)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user