mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-06 10:58:48 +09:00
firmware: qcom: scm: Fix missing read barrier in qcom_scm_is_available()
[ Upstream commit 0a744cceebd0480cb39587b3b1339d66a9d14063 ]
Commit 2e4955167ec5 ("firmware: qcom: scm: Fix __scm and waitq
completion variable initialization") introduced a write barrier in probe
function to store global '__scm' variable. It also claimed that it
added a read barrier, because as we all known barriers are paired (see
memory-barriers.txt: "Note that write barriers should normally be paired
with read or address-dependency barriers"), however it did not really
add it.
The offending commit used READ_ONCE() to access '__scm' global which is
not a barrier.
The barrier is needed so the store to '__scm' will be properly visible.
This is most likely not fatal in current driver design, because missing
read barrier would mean qcom_scm_is_available() callers will access old
value, NULL. Driver does not support unbinding and does not correctly
handle probe failures, thus there is no risk of stale or old pointer in
'__scm' variable.
However for code correctness, readability and to be sure that we did not
mess up something in this tricky topic of SMP barriers, add a read
barrier for accessing '__scm'. Change also comment from useless/obvious
what does barrier do, to what is expected: which other parts of the code
are involved here.
Fixes: 2e4955167ec5 ("firmware: qcom: scm: Fix __scm and waitq completion variable initialization")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241209-qcom-scm-missing-barriers-and-all-sort-of-srap-v2-1-9061013c8d92@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
67f04c52e5
commit
b11052c8c4
@@ -1339,7 +1339,8 @@ static int qcom_scm_find_dload_address(struct device *dev, u64 *addr)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool qcom_scm_is_available(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return !!READ_ONCE(__scm);
|
||||
/* Paired with smp_store_release() in qcom_scm_probe */
|
||||
return !!smp_load_acquire(&__scm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qcom_scm_is_available);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1457,7 +1458,7 @@ static int qcom_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Let all above stores be available after this */
|
||||
/* Paired with smp_load_acquire() in qcom_scm_is_available(). */
|
||||
smp_store_release(&__scm, scm);
|
||||
|
||||
irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user