shinys000114/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git synced 2026-06-07 19:30:30 +09:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

netlink: Do not schedule work from sk_destruct

Browse Source 
[ Upstream commit ed5d7788a9 ]

It is wrong to schedule a work from sk_destruct using the socket
as the memory reserve because the socket will be freed immediately
after the return from sk_destruct.

Instead we should do the deferral prior to sk_free.

This patch does just that.

Fixes: 707693c8a4 ("netlink: Call cb->done from a worker thread")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Herbert Xu
2016-12-05 15:28:21 +08:00
committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent d1ed9c1dba
commit baaf0c65bc
1 changed files with 15 additions and 17 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
net/netlink/af_netlink.c
View File

@@ -924,11 +924,13 @@ static void netlink_skb_set_owner_r(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
sk_mem_charge(sk, skb->truesize);
}
static void __netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
if (nlk->cb_running) {
if (nlk->cb.done)
nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
module_put(nlk->cb.module);
kfree_skb(nlk->cb.skb);
}
@@ -962,21 +964,7 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(work, struct netlink_sock,
work);
nlk->cb.done(&nlk->cb);
__netlink_sock_destruct(&nlk->sk);
}
static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
schedule_work(&nlk->work);
return;
}
__netlink_sock_destruct(sk);
sk_free(&nlk->sk);
}
/* This lock without WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE is good on UP and it is _very_ bad on
@@ -1284,8 +1272,18 @@ out_module:
static void deferred_put_nlk_sk(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct netlink_sock *nlk = container_of(head, struct netlink_sock, rcu);
struct sock *sk = &nlk->sk;
sock_put(&nlk->sk);
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&sk->sk_refcnt))
return;
if (nlk->cb_running && nlk->cb.done) {
INIT_WORK(&nlk->work, netlink_sock_destruct_work);
schedule_work(&nlk->work);
return;
}
sk_free(sk);
}
static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)