mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-07 03:15:31 +09:00
md/raid5: make use of spin_lock_irq over local_irq_disable + spin_lock
[ Upstream commit 3d05f3aed5 ]
On mainline, there is no functional difference, just less code, and
symmetric lock/unlock paths.
On PREEMPT_RT builds, this fixes the following warning, seen by
Alexander GQ Gerasiov, due to the sleeping nature of spinlocks.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:993
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 58, name: kworker/u12:1
CPU: 5 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/u12:1 Tainted: G W 4.9.20-rt16-stand6-686 #1
Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5027R-WRF/X9SRW-F, BIOS 3.2a 10/28/2015
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-253:0)
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x47/0x68
? migrate_enable+0x4a/0xf0
___might_sleep+0x101/0x180
rt_spin_lock+0x17/0x40
add_stripe_bio+0x4e3/0x6c0 [raid456]
? preempt_count_add+0x42/0xb0
raid5_make_request+0x737/0xdd0 [raid456]
Reported-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@redlab-i.ru>
Tested-by: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <gq@redlab-i.ru>
Signed-off-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
9abd45b5e5
commit
beaf445bdd
@@ -110,8 +110,7 @@ static inline void unlock_device_hash_lock(struct r5conf *conf, int hash)
|
||||
static inline void lock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(struct r5conf *conf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
local_irq_disable();
|
||||
spin_lock(conf->hash_locks);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(conf->hash_locks);
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS; i++)
|
||||
spin_lock_nest_lock(conf->hash_locks + i, conf->hash_locks);
|
||||
spin_lock(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
@@ -121,9 +120,9 @@ static inline void unlock_all_device_hash_locks_irq(struct r5conf *conf)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&conf->device_lock);
|
||||
for (i = NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS; i; i--)
|
||||
spin_unlock(conf->hash_locks + i - 1);
|
||||
local_irq_enable();
|
||||
for (i = NR_STRIPE_HASH_LOCKS - 1; i; i--)
|
||||
spin_unlock(conf->hash_locks + i);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(conf->hash_locks);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* bio's attached to a stripe+device for I/O are linked together in bi_sector
|
||||
@@ -732,12 +731,11 @@ static bool is_full_stripe_write(struct stripe_head *sh)
|
||||
|
||||
static void lock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
local_irq_disable();
|
||||
if (sh1 > sh2) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&sh2->stripe_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&sh2->stripe_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(&sh1->stripe_lock, 1);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
spin_lock(&sh1->stripe_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&sh1->stripe_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_nested(&sh2->stripe_lock, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -745,8 +743,7 @@ static void lock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
|
||||
static void unlock_two_stripes(struct stripe_head *sh1, struct stripe_head *sh2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sh1->stripe_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sh2->stripe_lock);
|
||||
local_irq_enable();
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&sh2->stripe_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only freshly new full stripe normal write stripe can be added to a batch list */
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user