mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 18:41:58 +09:00
ACPI: property: Use ACPI functions in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint() only
[ Upstream commit 5d010473cdeaabf6a2d3a9e2aed2186c1b73c213 ] Calling fwnode_get_next_child_node() in ACPI implementation of the fwnode property API is somewhat problematic as the latter is used in the impelementation of the former. Instead of using fwnode_get_next_child_node() in acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(), call acpi_get_next_subnode() directly instead. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251001104320.1272752-3-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
1bc34293df
commit
ce2bdfc4af
@@ -1370,7 +1370,7 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(
|
||||
|
||||
if (!prev) {
|
||||
do {
|
||||
port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port);
|
||||
port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The names of the port nodes begin with "port@"
|
||||
* followed by the number of the port node and they also
|
||||
@@ -1388,13 +1388,13 @@ static struct fwnode_handle *acpi_graph_get_next_endpoint(
|
||||
if (!port)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, prev);
|
||||
endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, prev);
|
||||
while (!endpoint) {
|
||||
port = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, port);
|
||||
port = acpi_get_next_subnode(fwnode, port);
|
||||
if (!port)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (is_acpi_graph_node(port, "port"))
|
||||
endpoint = fwnode_get_next_child_node(port, NULL);
|
||||
endpoint = acpi_get_next_subnode(port, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user