The estimated utilization for a task:
util_est = max(util_avg, est.enqueue, est.ewma)
is defined based on:
- util_avg: the PELT defined utilization
- est.enqueued: the util_avg at the end of the last activation
- est.ewma: a exponential moving average on the est.enqueued samples
According to this definition, when a task suddenly changes its bandwidth
requirements from small to big, the EWMA will need to collect multiple
samples before converging up to track the new big utilization.
This slow convergence towards bigger utilization values is not
aligned to the default scheduler behavior, which is to optimize for
performance. Moreover, the est.ewma component fails to compensate for
temporarely utilization drops which spans just few est.enqueued samples.
To let util_est do a better job in the scenario depicted above, change
its definition by making util_est directly follow upward motion and
only decay the est.ewma on downward.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191023205630.14469-1-patrick.bellasi@matbug.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit b8c9636140)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Change-Id: I5c0bdd401f3fe599a2b7b9215c9a3a621f91002d
By default uclamp RT tasks will use the max frequency, which is not the
desired default behavior on mobile devices.
Re-use the SUGOV_RT_MAX_FREQ sched_feat to control the default behavior.
When SUGOV_RT_MAX_FREQ is NOT selected, the uclamp_min value of the RT
tasks will be 0.
Note, since now we use SUGOV_RT_MAX_FREQ to enforce the default max
frequency for RT when uclamp is compiled in; the condition in
schedutil_cpu_util() needs to be inverted so that max no longer
unconditionally applied when uclamp is compiled in && SUGOV_RT_MAX_FREQ
is true. This unconditional application means uclamp values are always
ignored which is not what we want when uclamp is compiled in.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I3d36f1ebed6ef35a6299af32bbf4462d0353e783
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
task_fits_capacity() has just been made uclamp-aware, and
find_energy_efficient_cpu() needs to go through the same treatment.
Things are somewhat different here however - using the task max clamp isn't
sufficient. Consider the following setup:
The target runqueue, rq:
rq.cpu_capacity_orig = 512
rq.cfs.avg.util_avg = 200
rq.uclamp.max = 768 // the max p.uclamp.max of all enqueued p's is 768
The waking task, p (not yet enqueued on rq):
p.util_est = 600
p.uclamp.max = 100
Now, consider the following code which doesn't use the rq clamps:
util = uclamp_task_util(p);
// Does the task fit in the spare CPU capacity?
cpu = cpu_of(rq);
fits_capacity(util, cpu_capacity(cpu) - cpu_util(cpu))
This would lead to:
util = 100;
fits_capacity(100, 512 - 200)
fits_capacity() would return true. However, enqueuing p on that CPU *will*
cause it to become overutilized since rq clamp values are max-aggregated,
so we'd remain with
rq.uclamp.max = 768
which comes from the other tasks already enqueued on rq. Thus, we could
select a high enough frequency to reach beyond 0.8 * 512 utilization
(== overutilized) after enqueuing p on rq. What find_energy_efficient_cpu()
needs here is uclamp_rq_util_with() which lets us peek at the future
utilization landscape, including rq-wide uclamp values.
Make find_energy_efficient_cpu() use uclamp_rq_util_with() for its
fits_capacity() check. This is in line with what compute_energy() ends up
using for estimating utilization.
[QP: moved changes to select_cpu_candidates(), which is the equivalent
to the mainline path, and fix missing dependency on fits_capacity() by
using the open coded version]
Bug: 120440300
Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Suggested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211113851.24241-6-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1d42509e47)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Change-Id: Ibe1643cd5e6c97daceceae9733344e54bf4a4857
task_fits_capacity() drives CPU selection at wakeup time, and is also used
to detect misfit tasks. Right now it does so by comparing task_util_est()
with a CPU's capacity, but doesn't take into account uclamp restrictions.
There's a few interesting uses that can come out of doing this. For
instance, a low uclamp.max value could prevent certain tasks from being
flagged as misfit tasks, so they could merrily remain on low-capacity CPUs.
Similarly, a high uclamp.min value would steer tasks towards high capacity
CPUs at wakeup (and, should that fail, later steered via misfit balancing),
so such "boosted" tasks would favor CPUs of higher capacity.
Introduce uclamp_task_util() and make task_fits_capacity() use it.
[QP: fixed missing dependency on fits_capacity() by using the open coded
alternative]
Bug: 120440300
Tested-By: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211113851.24241-5-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit a7008c07a5)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Change-Id: Iabde2eda7252c3bcc273e61260a7a12a7de991b1
The main SchedTune API calls realted to task tuning attributes are now
wrapped by more generic and mainlinish UtilClamp calls.
The new APIs are:
- uclamp_task(p) <= boosted_task_util(p)
- uclamp_boosted(p) <= schedtune_task_boost(p) > 0
- uclamp_latency_sensitive(p) <= schedtune_prefer_idle(p)
Let's provide also an implementation of the same API based on the new
uclamp.uclamp_latency_sensitive flag.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
[Modified the patch to use uclamp.latency_sensitive instead mainline
attributes]
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ib1a6902e1c07a82a370e36bf1776d895b7528cbc
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Add a 'latency_sensitive' flag to uclamp in order to express the need
for some tasks to find a CPU where they can wake-up quickly. This is not
expected to be used without cgroup support, so add solely a cgroup
interface for it.
As this flag represents a boolean attribute and not an amount of
resources to be shared, it is not clear what the delegation logic should
be. As such, it is kept simple: every new cgroup starts with
latency_sensitive set to false, regardless of the parent.
In essence, this is similar to SchedTune's prefer-idle flag which was
used in android-4.19 and prior.
Bug: 120440300
Change-Id: I722d8ecabb428bb7b95a5b54bc70a87f182dde2a
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit ad7dd648fc7dbe11f23673a3463af2468a274998)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
The SchedTune CPU boosting API is currently used from sugov_get_util()
to get the boosted utilization and to pass it into schedutil_cpu_util().
When UtilClamp is in use instead we call schedutil_cpu_util() by
passing in just the CFS utilization and the clamping is done internally
on the aggregated CFS+RT utilization for FREQUENCY_UTIL calls.
This asymmetry is not required moreover, schedutil code is polluted by
non-mainline SchedTune code.
Wrap SchedTune API call related to cpu utilization boosting with a more
generic and mainlinish UtilClamp call:
- uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu, util, p) <= boosted_cpu_util(cpu)
This new API is already used in schedutil_cpu_util() to clamp the
aggregated RT+CFS utilization on FREQUENCY_UTIL calls.
Move the cpu boosting into uclamp_rq_util_with() so that we remove any
SchedTune specific bit from kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c.
Get rid of the no more required boosted_cpu_util(cpu) method and replace
it with a stune_util(cpu, util) which signature is better aligned with
its uclamp_rq_util_with(cpu, util, p) counterpart.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I45b0f0f54123fe0a2515fa9f1683842e6b99234f
[Removed superfluous __maybe_unused for capacity_orig_of]
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Uclamap and sched_tune features are mutually exclusive. The kernel must
be compiled with one or the other.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Iec209516aadb984fd3dead48ea3f3f3ca117335e
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
When a new cgroup is created, the effective uclamp value wasn't updated
with a call to cpu_util_update_eff() that looks at the hierarchy and
update to the most restrictive values.
Fix it by ensuring to call cpu_util_update_eff() when a new cgroup
becomes online.
Without this change, the newly created cgroup uses the default
root_task_group uclamp values, which is 1024 for both uclamp_{min, max},
which will cause the rq to to be clamped to max, hence cause the
system to run at max frequency.
The problem was observed on Ubuntu server and was reproduced on Debian
and Buildroot rootfs.
By default, Ubuntu and Debian create a cpu controller cgroup hierarchy
and add all tasks to it - which creates enough noise to keep the rq
uclamp value at max most of the time. Imitating this behavior makes the
problem visible in Buildroot too which otherwise looks fine since it's a
minimal userspace.
Bug: 120440300
Fixes: 0b60ba2dd3 ("sched/uclamp: Propagate parent clamps")
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000701d5b965$361b6c60$a2524520$@net/
(cherry picked from commit 7226017ad3https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I9636c60e04d58bbfc5041df1305b34a12b5a3f46
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Capacity Awareness refers to the fact that on heterogeneous systems
(like Arm big.LITTLE), the capacity of the CPUs is not uniform, hence
when placing tasks we need to be aware of this difference of CPU
capacities.
In such scenarios we want to ensure that the selected CPU has enough
capacity to meet the requirement of the running task. Enough capacity
means here that capacity_orig_of(cpu) >= task.requirement.
The definition of task.requirement is dependent on the scheduling class.
For CFS, utilization is used to select a CPU that has >= capacity value
than the cfs_task.util.
capacity_orig_of(cpu) >= cfs_task.util
DL isn't capacity aware at the moment but can make use of the bandwidth
reservation to implement that in a similar manner CFS uses utilization.
The following patchset implements that:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190506044836.2914-1-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it/
capacity_orig_of(cpu)/SCHED_CAPACITY >= dl_deadline/dl_runtime
For RT we don't have a per task utilization signal and we lack any
information in general about what performance requirement the RT task
needs. But with the introduction of uclamp, RT tasks can now control
that by setting uclamp_min to guarantee a minimum performance point.
ATM the uclamp value are only used for frequency selection; but on
heterogeneous systems this is not enough and we need to ensure that the
capacity of the CPU is >= uclamp_min. Which is what implemented here.
capacity_orig_of(cpu) >= rt_task.uclamp_min
Note that by default uclamp.min is 1024, which means that RT tasks will
always be biased towards the big CPUs, which make for a better more
predictable behavior for the default case.
Must stress that the bias acts as a hint rather than a definite
placement strategy. For example, if all big cores are busy executing
other RT tasks we can't guarantee that a new RT task will be placed
there.
On non-heterogeneous systems the original behavior of RT should be
retained. Similarly if uclamp is not selected in the config.
[ mingo: Minor edits to comments. ]
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191009104611.15363-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 804d402fb6https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git)
[Qais: resolved minor conflict in kernel/sched/cpupri.c]
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ifc9da1c47de1aec9b4d87be2614e4c8968366900
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
When cgroup is disabled the following compilation error was hit
kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘uclamp_update_active_tasks’:
kernel/sched/core.c:1081:23: error: storage size of ‘it’ isn’t known
struct css_task_iter it;
^~
kernel/sched/core.c:1084:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘css_task_iter_start’; did you mean ‘__sg_page_iter_start’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
css_task_iter_start(css, 0, &it);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
__sg_page_iter_start
kernel/sched/core.c:1085:14: error: implicit declaration of function ‘css_task_iter_next’; did you mean ‘__sg_page_iter_next’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
while ((p = css_task_iter_next(&it))) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
__sg_page_iter_next
kernel/sched/core.c:1091:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘css_task_iter_end’; did you mean ‘get_task_cred’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
css_task_iter_end(&it);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
get_task_cred
kernel/sched/core.c:1081:23: warning: unused variable ‘it’ [-Wunused-variable]
struct css_task_iter it;
^~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [kernel/sched/core.o] Error 1
Fix by protetion uclamp_update_active_tasks() with
CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP
Bug: 120440300
Fixes: babbe170e0 ("sched/uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes")
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191105112212.596-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
(cherry picked from commit e3b8b6a0d1)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ia4c0f801d68050526f9f117ec9189e448b01345a
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo reported that 'chrt' broke on recent kernels:
$ chrt -p $$
chrt: failed to get pid 26306's policy: Argument list too long
and he has root-caused the bug to the following commit increasing sched_attr
size and breaking sched_read_attr() into returning -EFBIG:
a509a7cd79 ("sched/uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping")
The other, bigger bug is that the whole sched_getattr() and sched_read_attr()
logic of checking non-zero bits in new ABI components is arguably broken,
and pretty much any extension of the ABI will spuriously break the ABI.
That's way too fragile.
Instead implement the perf syscall's extensible ABI instead, which we
already implement on the sched_setattr() side:
- if user-attributes have the same size as kernel attributes then the
logic is unchanged.
- if user-attributes are larger than the kernel knows about then simply
skip the extra bits, but set attr->size to the (smaller) kernel size
so that tooling can (in principle) handle older kernel as well.
- if user-attributes are smaller than the kernel knows about then just
copy whatever user-space can accept.
Also clean up the whole logic:
- Simplify the code flow - there's no need for 'ret' for example.
- Standardize on 'kattr/uattr' and 'ksize/usize' naming to make sure we
always know which side we are dealing with.
- Why is it called 'read' when what it does is to copy to user? This
code is so far away from VFS read() semantics that the naming is
actively confusing. Name it sched_attr_copy_to_user() instead, which
mirrors other copy_to_user() functionality.
- Move the attr->size assignment from the head of sched_getattr() to the
sched_attr_copy_to_user() function. Nothing else within the kernel
should care about the size of the structure.
With these fixes the sched_getattr() syscall now nicely supports an
extensible ABI in both a forward and backward compatible fashion, and
will also fix the chrt bug.
As an added bonus the bogus -EFBIG return is removed as well, which as
Thadeu noted should have been -E2BIG to begin with.
Bug: 120440300
Reported-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Tested-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: a509a7cd79 ("sched/uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190904075532.GA26751@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1251201c0d)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I67e653c4f69db0140e9651c125b60e2b8cfd62f1
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
When a task specific clamp value is configured via sched_setattr(2), this
value is accounted in the corresponding clamp bucket every time the task is
{en,de}qeued. However, when cgroups are also in use, the task specific
clamp values could be restricted by the task_group (TG) clamp values.
Update uclamp_cpu_inc() to aggregate task and TG clamp values. Every time a
task is enqueued, it's accounted in the clamp bucket tracking the smaller
clamp between the task specific value and its TG effective value. This
allows to:
1. ensure cgroup clamps are always used to restrict task specific requests,
i.e. boosted not more than its TG effective protection and capped at
least as its TG effective limit.
2. implement a "nice-like" policy, where tasks are still allowed to request
less than what enforced by their TG effective limits and protections
Do this by exploiting the concept of "effective" clamp, which is already
used by a TG to track parent enforced restrictions.
Apply task group clamp restrictions only to tasks belonging to a child
group. While, for tasks in the root group or in an autogroup, system
defaults are still enforced.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190822132811.31294-5-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3eac870a32)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I0215e0a68cc0fa7c441e33052757f8571b7c99b9
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
The clamp values are not tunable at the level of the root task group.
That's for two main reasons:
- the root group represents "system resources" which are always
entirely available from the cgroup standpoint.
- when tuning/restricting "system resources" makes sense, tuning must
be done using a system wide API which should also be available when
control groups are not.
When a system wide restriction is available, cgroups should be aware of
its value in order to know exactly how much "system resources" are
available for the subgroups.
Utilization clamping supports already the concepts of:
- system defaults: which define the maximum possible clamp values
usable by tasks.
- effective clamps: which allows a parent cgroup to constraint (maybe
temporarily) its descendants without losing the information related
to the values "requested" from them.
Exploit these two concepts and bind them together in such a way that,
whenever system default are tuned, the new values are propagated to
(possibly) restrict or relax the "effective" value of nested cgroups.
When cgroups are in use, force an update of all the RUNNABLE tasks.
Otherwise, keep things simple and do just a lazy update next time each
task will be enqueued.
Do that since we assume a more strict resource control is required when
cgroups are in use. This allows also to keep "effective" clamp values
updated in case we need to expose them to user-space.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190822132811.31294-4-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 7274a5c1bb)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ibf7ce5c46b67c79765b56b792ee22ed9595802c3
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
In order to properly support hierarchical resources control, the cgroup
delegation model requires that attribute writes from a child group never
fail but still are locally consistent and constrained based on parent's
assigned resources. This requires to properly propagate and aggregate
parent attributes down to its descendants.
Implement this mechanism by adding a new "effective" clamp value for each
task group. The effective clamp value is defined as the smaller value
between the clamp value of a group and the effective clamp value of its
parent. This is the actual clamp value enforced on tasks in a task group.
Since it's possible for a cpu.uclamp.min value to be bigger than the
cpu.uclamp.max value, ensure local consistency by restricting each
"protection" (i.e. min utilization) with the corresponding "limit"
(i.e. max utilization).
Do that at effective clamps propagation to ensure all user-space write
never fails while still always tracking the most restrictive values.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190822132811.31294-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0b60ba2dd3)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: If1cc136e1fb4a8f4c6ea15dc440b28d833a8d7e7
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
The cgroup CPU bandwidth controller allows to assign a specified
(maximum) bandwidth to the tasks of a group. However this bandwidth is
defined and enforced only on a temporal base, without considering the
actual frequency a CPU is running on. Thus, the amount of computation
completed by a task within an allocated bandwidth can be very different
depending on the actual frequency the CPU is running that task.
The amount of computation can be affected also by the specific CPU a
task is running on, especially when running on asymmetric capacity
systems like Arm's big.LITTLE.
With the availability of schedutil, the scheduler is now able
to drive frequency selections based on actual task utilization.
Moreover, the utilization clamping support provides a mechanism to
bias the frequency selection operated by schedutil depending on
constraints assigned to the tasks currently RUNNABLE on a CPU.
Giving the mechanisms described above, it is now possible to extend the
cpu controller to specify the minimum (or maximum) utilization which
should be considered for tasks RUNNABLE on a cpu.
This makes it possible to better defined the actual computational
power assigned to task groups, thus improving the cgroup CPU bandwidth
controller which is currently based just on time constraints.
Extend the CPU controller with a couple of new attributes uclamp.{min,max}
which allow to enforce utilization boosting and capping for all the
tasks in a group.
Specifically:
- uclamp.min: defines the minimum utilization which should be considered
i.e. the RUNNABLE tasks of this group will run at least at a
minimum frequency which corresponds to the uclamp.min
utilization
- uclamp.max: defines the maximum utilization which should be considered
i.e. the RUNNABLE tasks of this group will run up to a
maximum frequency which corresponds to the uclamp.max
utilization
These attributes:
a) are available only for non-root nodes, both on default and legacy
hierarchies, while system wide clamps are defined by a generic
interface which does not depends on cgroups. This system wide
interface enforces constraints on tasks in the root node.
b) enforce effective constraints at each level of the hierarchy which
are a restriction of the group requests considering its parent's
effective constraints. Root group effective constraints are defined
by the system wide interface.
This mechanism allows each (non-root) level of the hierarchy to:
- request whatever clamp values it would like to get
- effectively get only up to the maximum amount allowed by its parent
c) have higher priority than task-specific clamps, defined via
sched_setattr(), thus allowing to control and restrict task requests.
Add two new attributes to the cpu controller to collect "requested"
clamp values. Allow that at each non-root level of the hierarchy.
Keep it simple by not caring now about "effective" values computation
and propagation along the hierarchy.
Update sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler() to use the newly introduced
uclamp_mutex so that we serialize system default updates with cgroup
relate updates.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190822132811.31294-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2480c09313)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I0285c44910bf073b80d7996361e6698bc5aedfae
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
The Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) estimates the energy impact of waking
up a task on a given CPU. This estimation is based on:
a) an (active) power consumption defined for each CPU frequency
b) an estimation of which frequency will be used on each CPU
c) an estimation of the busy time (utilization) of each CPU
Utilization clamping can affect both b) and c).
A CPU is expected to run:
- on an higher than required frequency, but for a shorter time, in case
its estimated utilization will be smaller than the minimum utilization
enforced by uclamp
- on a smaller than required frequency, but for a longer time, in case
its estimated utilization is bigger than the maximum utilization
enforced by uclamp
While compute_energy() already accounts clamping effects on busy time,
the clamping effects on frequency selection are currently ignored.
Fix it by considering how CPU clamp values will be affected by a
task waking up and being RUNNABLE on that CPU.
Do that by refactoring schedutil_freq_util() to take an additional
task_struct* which allows EAS to evaluate the impact on clamp values of
a task being eventually queued in a CPU. Clamp values are applied to the
RT+CFS utilization only when a FREQUENCY_UTIL is required by
compute_energy().
Do note that switching from ENERGY_UTIL to FREQUENCY_UTIL in the
computation of the cpu_util signal implies that we are more likely to
estimate the highest OPP when a RT task is running in another CPU of
the same performance domain. This can have an impact on energy
estimation but:
- it's not easy to say which approach is better, since it depends on
the use case
- the original approach could still be obtained by setting a smaller
task-specific util_min whenever required
Since we are at that:
- rename schedutil_freq_util() into schedutil_cpu_util(),
since it's not only used for frequency selection.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-12-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit af24bde8df)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
[Moved cpu_util_cfs() outside of CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL]
Change-Id: Idc4933f44be746ce35c1181a9288e6cb5d9607b2
[Protect cpu_util_cfs() with CONFIG_SMP ifdefery]
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Each time a frequency update is required via schedutil, a frequency is
selected to (possibly) satisfy the utilization reported by each
scheduling class and irqs. However, when utilization clamping is in use,
the frequency selection should consider userspace utilization clamping
hints. This will allow, for example, to:
- boost tasks which are directly affecting the user experience
by running them at least at a minimum "requested" frequency
- cap low priority tasks not directly affecting the user experience
by running them only up to a maximum "allowed" frequency
These constraints are meant to support a per-task based tuning of the
frequency selection thus supporting a fine grained definition of
performance boosting vs energy saving strategies in kernel space.
Add support to clamp the utilization of RUNNABLE FAIR and RT tasks
within the boundaries defined by their aggregated utilization clamp
constraints.
Do that by considering the max(min_util, max_util) to give boosted tasks
the performance they need even when they happen to be co-scheduled with
other capped tasks.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-10-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 982d9cdc22)
Conflicts:
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
1. Merged the if condition to include the non-upstream
sched_feat(SUGOV_RT_MAX_FREQ) check
2. Change the function signature to pass util_cfs and define
util as an automatic variable.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ie222c9ad84776fc2948e30c116eee876df697a17
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
The SCHED_DEADLINE scheduling class provides an advanced and formal
model to define tasks requirements that can translate into proper
decisions for both task placements and frequencies selections. Other
classes have a more simplified model based on the POSIX concept of
priorities.
Such a simple priority based model however does not allow to exploit
most advanced features of the Linux scheduler like, for example, driving
frequencies selection via the schedutil cpufreq governor. However, also
for non SCHED_DEADLINE tasks, it's still interesting to define tasks
properties to support scheduler decisions.
Utilization clamping exposes to user-space a new set of per-task
attributes the scheduler can use as hints about the expected/required
utilization for a task. This allows to implement a "proactive" per-task
frequency control policy, a more advanced policy than the current one
based just on "passive" measured task utilization. For example, it's
possible to boost interactive tasks (e.g. to get better performance) or
cap background tasks (e.g. to be more energy/thermal efficient).
Introduce a new API to set utilization clamping values for a specified
task by extending sched_setattr(), a syscall which already allows to
define task specific properties for different scheduling classes. A new
pair of attributes allows to specify a minimum and maximum utilization
the scheduler can consider for a task.
Do that by validating the required clamp values before and then applying
the required changes using _the_ same pattern already in use for
__setscheduler(). This ensures that the task is re-enqueued with the new
clamp values.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-7-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit a509a7cd79)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I420e7ece5628bc639811a79654c35135a65bfd02
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Tasks without a user-defined clamp value are considered not clamped
and by default their utilization can have any value in the
[0..SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE] range.
Tasks with a user-defined clamp value are allowed to request any value
in that range, and the required clamp is unconditionally enforced.
However, a "System Management Software" could be interested in limiting
the range of clamp values allowed for all tasks.
Add a privileged interface to define a system default configuration via:
/proc/sys/kernel/sched_uclamp_util_{min,max}
which works as an unconditional clamp range restriction for all tasks.
With the default configuration, the full SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE range of
values is allowed for each clamp index. Otherwise, the task-specific
clamp is capped by the corresponding system default value.
Do that by tracking, for each task, the "effective" clamp value and
bucket the task has been refcounted in at enqueue time. This
allows to lazy aggregate "requested" and "system default" values at
enqueue time and simplifies refcounting updates at dequeue time.
The cached bucket ids are used to avoid (relatively) more expensive
integer divisions every time a task is enqueued.
An active flag is used to report when the "effective" value is valid and
thus the task is actually refcounted in the corresponding rq's bucket.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-5-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit e8f14172c6)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I4f014c5ec9c312aaad606518f6e205fd0cfbcaa2
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Because of bucketization, different task-specific clamp values are
tracked in the same bucket. For example, with 20% bucket size and
assuming to have:
Task1: util_min=25%
Task2: util_min=35%
both tasks will be refcounted in the [20..39]% bucket and always boosted
only up to 20% thus implementing a simple floor aggregation normally
used in histograms.
In systems with only few and well-defined clamp values, it would be
useful to track the exact clamp value required by a task whenever
possible. For example, if a system requires only 23% and 47% boost
values then it's possible to track the exact boost required by each
task using only 3 buckets of ~33% size each.
Introduce a mechanism to max aggregate the requested clamp values of
RUNNABLE tasks in the same bucket. Keep it simple by resetting the
bucket value to its base value only when a bucket becomes inactive.
Allow a limited and controlled overboosting margin for tasks recounted
in the same bucket.
In systems where the boost values are not known in advance, it is still
possible to control the maximum acceptable overboosting margin by tuning
the number of clamp groups. For example, 20 groups ensure a 5% maximum
overboost.
Remove the rq bucket initialization code since a correct bucket value
is now computed when a task is refcounted into a CPU's rq.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 60daf9c194)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I8782971f8867033cee5aaf981c96f9de33a5288c
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Utilization clamping allows to clamp the CPU's utilization within a
[util_min, util_max] range, depending on the set of RUNNABLE tasks on
that CPU. Each task references two "clamp buckets" defining its minimum
and maximum (util_{min,max}) utilization "clamp values". A CPU's clamp
bucket is active if there is at least one RUNNABLE tasks enqueued on
that CPU and refcounting that bucket.
When a task is {en,de}queued {on,from} a rq, the set of active clamp
buckets on that CPU can change. If the set of active clamp buckets
changes for a CPU a new "aggregated" clamp value is computed for that
CPU. This is because each clamp bucket enforces a different utilization
clamp value.
Clamp values are always MAX aggregated for both util_min and util_max.
This ensures that no task can affect the performance of other
co-scheduled tasks which are more boosted (i.e. with higher util_min
clamp) or less capped (i.e. with higher util_max clamp).
A task has:
task_struct::uclamp[clamp_id]::bucket_id
to track the "bucket index" of the CPU's clamp bucket it refcounts while
enqueued, for each clamp index (clamp_id).
A runqueue has:
rq::uclamp[clamp_id]::bucket[bucket_id].tasks
to track how many RUNNABLE tasks on that CPU refcount each
clamp bucket (bucket_id) of a clamp index (clamp_id).
It also has a:
rq::uclamp[clamp_id]::bucket[bucket_id].value
to track the clamp value of each clamp bucket (bucket_id) of a clamp
index (clamp_id).
The rq::uclamp::bucket[clamp_id][] array is scanned every time it's
needed to find a new MAX aggregated clamp value for a clamp_id. This
operation is required only when it's dequeued the last task of a clamp
bucket tracking the current MAX aggregated clamp value. In this case,
the CPU is either entering IDLE or going to schedule a less boosted or
more clamped task.
The expected number of different clamp values configured at build time
is small enough to fit the full unordered array into a single cache
line, for configurations of up to 7 buckets.
Add to struct rq the basic data structures required to refcount the
number of RUNNABLE tasks for each clamp bucket. Add also the max
aggregation required to update the rq's clamp value at each
enqueue/dequeue event.
Use a simple linear mapping of clamp values into clamp buckets.
Pre-compute and cache bucket_id to avoid integer divisions at
enqueue/dequeue time.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 69842cba9a)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: I2c2c23572fb82e004f815cc9c783881355df6836
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
cgroup already uses floating point for percent[ile] numbers and there
are several controllers which want to take them as input. Add a
generic parse helper to handle inputs.
Update the interface convention documentation about the use of
percentage numbers. While at it, also clarify the default time unit.
Bug: 120440300
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit a5e112e642)
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ic1fcf21d7955eb8edd2e8e91517bca6aef41694f
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
SND_8X0 and AC_97 should not be part of GKI.
Test: Treehugger
Bug: 139431025
Change-Id: I26fafd66abf639415ec8666cefd61db58b38578d
Signed-off-by: Ram Muthiah <rammuthiah@google.com>
With CONFIG_THINLTO and CFI both enabled, LLVM appends a hash to the
names of all static functions. This breaks userspace tools, so strip
out the hash from output.
Bug: 147422318
Change-Id: Ibea6be089d530e92dcd191481cb02549041203f6
Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Fix all sparse errors in fs/incfs except
fs/incfs/integrity.c:192:9: warning: Variable length array is used
Test: incfs_test passes
Bug: 133435829
Change-Id: I9c2e26e4e1a06a894977f11a3c8559b968dd115e
Signed-off-by: Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>
Fixed incfs_test build errors
Fixed Kconfig errors
Readded .gitignore
Test: With just enabling CONFIG_INCREMENTAL_FS, both defconfig and
cuttlefish_defconfig build and incfs_test runs and passes
Bug: 133435829
Change-Id: Id3247ffcc63a095f66dcedf554017a06c5a9ce4a
Signed-off-by: Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@google.com>
SND_VMASTER must be builtin to the GKI for leaf configs of this
config such as SND_8X0 and AC_97 to be loaded as modules.
CRYPTO_ENGINE is now used by Android userspace.
Enable as part of GKI.
Bug: 139431025
Test: Treehugger
Change-Id: I2cd422a88a3ec0bc6bbf59d9faa3616e42cc2038
Signed-off-by: Ram Muthiah <rammuthiah@google.com>
