Second set of iwlwifi patches intended for v5.8
* Support new FW APIs;
* Remove some old and unused features;
* HW configuration rework continues;
* Some queues rework by Johannes;
* Enable A-AMSDU in low latency;
* Some debugging fixes;
* Some other small fixes and clean-ups;
# gpg: Signature made Fri 08 May 2020 10:08:58 AM EEST using RSA key ID 1A3CC5FA
# gpg: Good signature from "Luciano Roth Coelho (Luca) <luca@coelho.fi>"
# gpg: aka "Luciano Roth Coelho (Intel) <luciano.coelho@intel.com>"
8723D is a Wifi+BT combo card. To make them work properly, we need coex
mechanism to avoid interference, such as TX simultaneously. Basically,
coex.c provide main algorithm to deal with many use cases, and this commit
adds some parameters and ops differ from other chips, because coex
hardware and WiFi generation are changed.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-8-yhchuang@realtek.com
When chip's temperature is changed, RF characters are changed. To keep the
characters to be consistent, 8723d uses thermal meter to assist in
calibrating LCK, IQK, crystal and TX power.
A base thermal value is programmed in efuse, all calibration data in
MP process is based on this thermal value. So we calucate the delta of
thermal value between the base value, and use this delta to reference XTAL
and TX power offset tables to know how much we need to adjust.
For IQK and LCK, driver checks if delta of thermal value is over 8, then
they are triggered.
For crystal adjustment, when delta of thermal value is changed, we check
XTAL tables to get offset of XTAL value. If thermal value is larger than
base value, positive table (_p as suffix) is used. Otherwise, we use
negative table (_n as suffix). Then, we add offset to XTAL default value
programmed in efuse, and write sum value to register.
To compensate TX power, there are two hierarchical tables. First level use
delta of thermal value to access eight tables to yield delta of TX power
index. Then, plus base TX power index to get index of BB swing table
(second level tables) where register value is induced.
BB swing table can't deal with all cases, if index of BB swing table is
over the size of the table. In this case, TX AGC is used to compensate the
remnant part. Assume 'upper' is the upper bound of BB swing table, and
'target' is the desired index. Then, we can illustrate them as
compensation method BB swing TX AGC
------------------- -------- --------------
target > upper upper target - upper
target < 0 0 target
otherwise target 0
For debug purpose, add a column 'rem' to tx_pwr_tbl entry, and it looks
like
path rate pwr base (byr lmt ) rem
A CCK_1M 32(0x20) 34 -2 ( 0 -2) 0
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
IQ calibration is used to calibrate RF characteristic to yield expected
performance. Basically, we do calibration twice and compare the similarity
to determine calibration is good or not, if not we do the third
calibration, and then compare with the results of first and second
calibration. If it still not similar, IQK is failed.
Before doing calibration, we need to backup registers that will be
modified in calibration procedure, and restore these registers after
calibration is done.
A calibration procedure can divided into four sub-procedures that are
S1-TX, S1-RX, S0-TX and S0-RX. Where, S1 and S0 represent to path A and B
respectively. Each sub-procedure configure proper registers, and then
rigger one-shot calibration and poll until completion. For RX calibration,
it needs to do twice one-shot calibration, first one is to yield parameter
used by second one.
The result of TX part is stored for TX power tracking that adjusts TX AGC
to output expected power.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
An incorrect value of use_fwsup is set for 4-way handshake offload for
WPA//WPA2-PSK, caused by commit 3b1e0a7bdf ("brcmfmac: add support for
SAE authentication offload"). It results in missing bit
BRCMF_VIF_STATUS_EAP_SUCCESS set in brcmf_is_linkup() and causes the
failure. This patch correct the value for the case.
Also setting bit BRCMF_VIF_STATUS_EAP_SUCCESS for SAE offload case in
brcmf_is_linkup() to fix SAE offload failure.
Fixes: 3b1e0a7bdf ("brcmfmac: add support for SAE authentication offload")
Signed-off-by: Chung-Hsien Hsu <stanley.hsu@cypress.com>
Signed-off-by: Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1589277788-119966-1-git-send-email-chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507192647.GA16710@embeddedor
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich.os@quantenna.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507191926.GA15970@embeddedor
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507190210.GA15375@embeddedor
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507185914.GA15124@embeddedor
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507185529.GA14639@embeddedor
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507185451.GA14603@embeddedor
In WLAN, priority among various access categories of traffic is
always set by the AP using WMM parameters and this may not always
follow the standard 802.1d priority.
In this change, priority is adjusted based on the AP WMM params
received as part of the Assoc Response and the same is later used
to map the priority of all incoming traffic.
In a specific scenario where EDCA parameters are configured to be same
for all ACs, use the default FW priority definition to avoid queuing
packets of all ACs to the same priority queue.
This change fixes the following 802.11 certification tests:
* 11n - 5.2.31 ACM Bit Conformance test
* 11n - 5.2.32 AC Parameter Modification test
* 11ac - 5.2.33 TXOP Limit test
Signed-off-by: Saravanan Shanmugham <saravanan.shanmugham@cypress.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Li <justin.li@cypress.com>
Signed-off-by: Madhan Mohan R <madhanmohan.r@cypress.com>
Signed-off-by: Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1588661487-21884-2-git-send-email-chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com
We don't really expect fragmented RBs, and don't seem to be seeing
them in practice since that would've caused a crash. Nevertheless,
we should be expecting the hardware to send them.
Parse the flag indicating a fragmented buffer, but then discard it
and any fragments thereof, at least for now. We need to do more
work in the higher layers to properly deal with this, since we may
not get "normal" firmware notifications that are fragmented, only
RX, and then we need to put it back together and add the necessary
API to report a chain of things to the higher layers, this doesn't
fit into the struct iwl_rx_cmd_buffer today.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200425130140.e78a59f70b1d.Ica656a98a4e4220d73edc97600edd680cbc97241@changeid
The hardware needs a byte-count table with the size of each frame
on the queue to build A-MPDUs, but:
* newer generation no longer have the duplicated space at the end,
they can deal with the wrap properly - and we don't even fill
the dup anyway
* we have a maximum queue size of 512 right now and don't use the
theoretical hardware maximum of 65536.
Together, this reduces the byte count table DMA allocation from
64KiB (65536*2 + 64*2 rounded up) to 1 KiB (though that might be
rounded up to a full 4 KiB page by the allocator, not sure it can
share the allocations.)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200425130140.c263b787b5ab.I059507a9760b1ce1d45d84dcaa91629a5cfb58e0@changeid
