[ Upstream commit 861dbb2b15 ]
After commit 71de0a054d ("arm64: tegra: Drop serial clock-names and
reset-names") was applied, the HSUART failed to probe and the following
error is seen:
serial-tegra 3100000.serial: Couldn't get the reset
serial-tegra: probe of 3100000.serial failed with error -2
Commit 71de0a054d ("arm64: tegra: Drop serial clock-names and
reset-names") is correct because the "reset-names" property is not
needed for 8250 UARTs. However, the "reset-names" is required for the
HSUART and should have been populated as part of commit ff578db7b6
("arm64: tegra: Enable UART instance on 40-pin header") that
enabled the HSUART for Jetson AGX Orin. Fix this by populating the
"reset-names" property for the HSUART on Jetson AGX Orin.
Fixes: ff578db7b6 ("arm64: tegra: Enable UART instance on 40-pin header")
Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3392ef368d ]
This fixes:
arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47189-luxul-xap-1440.dtb: pcie@2000: '#address-cells' is a required property
From schema: /lib/python3.10/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47189-luxul-xap-1440.dtb: pcie@2000: '#size-cells' is a required property
From schema: /lib/python3.10/site-packages/dtschema/schemas/pci/pci-bus.yaml
Two properties that need to be added later are "device_type" and
"ranges". Adding "device_type" on its own causes a new warning and the
value of "ranges" needs to be determined yet.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707114004.2740-3-zajec5@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 05d2c3d552 ]
Such property simply doesn't exist (is not documented or used anywhere).
This fixes:
arch/arm/boot/dts/broadcom/bcm47189-luxul-xap-1440.dtb: usb@d000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('#usb-cells' was unexpected)
From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ohci.yaml
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230707114004.2740-2-zajec5@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 822130b5e8 ]
On 32-bit architectures comparing a resource against a value larger than
U32_MAX can cause a warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:1344:18: error: result of comparison of constant 4294967296 with expression of type 'resource_size_t' (aka 'unsigned int') is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
res->start > 0x100000000ull)
~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
As gcc does not warn about this in dead code, add an IS_ENABLED() check at
the start of the function. This will always return success but not actually resize
the BAR on 32-bit architectures without high memory, which is exactly what
we want here, as the driver can fall back to bank switching the VRAM
access.
Fixes: 31b8adab32 ("drm/amdgpu: require a root bus window above 4GB for BAR resize")
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit deb7edbc27 ]
Add missing "detach" mailbox to this board to permit the CPU to inform
the remote processor on a detach. This signal allows the remote processor
firmware to stop IPC communication and to reinitialize the resources for
a re-attach.
Without this mailbox, detach is not possible and kernel log contains the
following warning to, so make sure all the STM32MP15xx platform DTs are
in sync regarding the mailboxes to fix the detach issue and the warning:
"
stm32-rproc 10000000.m4: mbox_request_channel_byname() could not locate channel named "detach"
"
Fixes: 6257dfc1c4 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add coprocessor detach mbox on stm32mp15x-dkx boards")
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9bcfc3cdc9 ]
The generic ADC channel binding is recommended over legacy one, update the
DT to the modern binding. No functional change. For further details, see
commit which adds the generic binding to STM32 ADC binding document:
'664b9879f56e ("dt-bindings: iio: stm32-adc: add generic channel binding")'
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Stable-dep-of: deb7edbc27 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add missing detach mailbox for DHCOM SoM")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 966f04a89d ]
Add missing "detach" mailbox to this board to permit the CPU to inform
the remote processor on a detach. This signal allows the remote processor
firmware to stop IPC communication and to reinitialize the resources for
a re-attach.
Without this mailbox, detach is not possible and kernel log contains the
following warning to, so make sure all the STM32MP15xx platform DTs are
in sync regarding the mailboxes to fix the detach issue and the warning:
"
stm32-rproc 10000000.m4: mbox_request_channel_byname() could not locate channel named "detach"
"
Fixes: 6257dfc1c4 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add coprocessor detach mbox on stm32mp15x-dkx boards")
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0ee0ef38aa ]
Add missing "detach" mailbox to this board to permit the CPU to inform
the remote processor on a detach. This signal allows the remote processor
firmware to stop IPC communication and to reinitialize the resources for
a re-attach.
Without this mailbox, detach is not possible and kernel log contains the
following warning to, so make sure all the STM32MP15xx platform DTs are
in sync regarding the mailboxes to fix the detach issue and the warning:
"
stm32-rproc 10000000.m4: mbox_request_channel_byname() could not locate channel named "detach"
"
Fixes: 6257dfc1c4 ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add coprocessor detach mbox on stm32mp15x-dkx boards")
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c46e9b6cc9 ]
Use STM32 ADC generic bindings instead of legacy bindings on
emtrion GmbH Argon boards.
The STM32 ADC specific binding to declare channels has been deprecated,
hence adopt the generic IIO channels bindings, instead.
The STM32MP151 device tree now exposes internal channels using the
generic binding. This makes the change mandatory here to avoid a mixed
use of legacy and generic binding, which is not supported by the driver.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@foss.st.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>
Stable-dep-of: 0ee0ef38aa ("ARM: dts: stm32: Add missing detach mailbox for emtrion emSBC-Argon")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6b8a633507 ]
Sony ever so graciously provides GPIO line names in their downstream
kernel (though sometimes they are not 100% accurate and you can judge
that by simply looking at them and with what drivers they are used).
Add these to the PDX203&206 DTSIs to better document the hardware.
Diff between 203 and 206:
pm8009_gpios
< "CAM_PWR_LD_EN",
> "NC",
pm8150_gpios
< "NC",
> "G_ASSIST_N",
< "WLC_EN_N", /* GPIO_10 */
> "NC", /* GPIO_10 */
Which is due to 5 II having an additional Google Assistant hardware
button and 1 II having a wireless charger & different camera wiring
to accommodate the additional 3D iToF sensor.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230614-topic-edo_pinsgpiopmic-v2-2-6f90bba54c53@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: a422c6a91a ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-edo: Rectify gpio-keys")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 40b398beab ]
Sony ever so graciously provides GPIO line names in their downstream
kernel (though sometimes they are not 100% accurate and you can judge
that by simply looking at them and with what drivers they are used).
Add these to the PDX203&206 DTSIs to better document the hardware.
Diff between 203 and 206:
< "CAM_PWR_A_CS",
> "FRONTC_PWR_EN",
< "CAM4_MCLK",
< "TOF_RST_N",
> "NC",
> "NC",
< "WLC_I2C_SDA",
< "WLC_I2C_SCL", /* GPIO_120 */
> "NC",
> "NC",
< "WLC_INT_N",
> "NC",
Which makes sense, as 203 has a 3D iToF, slightly different camera
power wiring and WLC (WireLess Charging).
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230614-topic-edo_pinsgpiopmic-v2-1-6f90bba54c53@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: a422c6a91a ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250-edo: Rectify gpio-keys")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 775a5283c2 ]
sm8250 faces the same problem with its Energy Model as sdm845. The energy
cost of LITTLE cores is reported to be higher than medium or big cores
EM computes the energy with formula:
energy = OPP's cost / maximum cpu capacity * utilization
On v6.4-rc6 we have:
max capacity of CPU0 = 284
capacity of CPU0's OPP(1612800 Hz) = 253
cost of CPU0's OPP(1612800 Hz) = 191704
max capacity of CPU4 = 871
capacity of CPU4's OPP(710400 Hz) = 255
cost of CPU4's OPP(710400 Hz) = 343217
Both OPPs have almost the same compute capacity but the estimated energy
per unit of utilization will be estimated to:
energy CPU0 = 191704 / 284 * 1 = 675
energy CPU4 = 343217 / 871 * 1 = 394
EM estimates that little CPU0 will consume 71% more than medium CPU4 for
the same compute capacity. According to [1], little consumes 25% less than
medium core for Coremark benchmark at those OPPs for the same duration.
Set the dynamic-power-coefficient of CPU0-3 to 105 to fix the energy model
for little CPUs.
[1] https://github.com/kdrag0n/freqbench/tree/master/results/sm8250/k30s
Fixes: 6aabed5526 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: Add CPU capacities and energy model")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615154852.130076-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a7b484b1c9 ]
Since we're using these two macros to read a value from a register, we
need to use the FIELD_GET instead of the FIELD_PREP macro, otherwise
we're getting wrong values.
So instead of:
[ 3.111779] ocmem fdd00000.sram: 2 ports, 1 regions, 512 macros, not interleaved
we now get the correct value of:
[ 3.129672] ocmem fdd00000.sram: 2 ports, 1 regions, 2 macros, not interleaved
Fixes: 88c1e9404f ("soc: qcom: add OCMEM driver")
Reviewed-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@z3ntu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230506-msm8226-ocmem-v3-1-79da95a2581f@z3ntu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8d1077cf2e ]
Fixes the following build errors on arm64:
drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c: In function 'hvfb_getmem':
>> drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c:1033:24: error: 'screen_info' undeclared (first use in this function)
1033 | base = screen_info.lfb_base;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/video/fbdev/hyperv_fb.c:1033:24: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_drv.c:75:54: error: 'screen_info' undeclared (first use in this function)
75 | drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(screen_info.lfb_base,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_drv.c:75:54: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307090823.nxnT8Kk5-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: 81d2393485 ("fbdev/hyperv-fb: Do not set struct fb_info.apertures")
Fixes: 8b0d13545b ("efi: Do not include <linux/screen_info.h> from EFI header")
Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230709100514.703759-1-suijingfeng@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e101bf95ea ]
[WHY]
Writing to DRR registers such as OTG_V_TOTAL_MIN on the same frame as a
pipe commit can cause underflow.
[HOW]
Move DMUB p-state delegate into optimze_bandwidth; enabling FAMS sets
optimized_required.
This change expects that Freesync requests are blocked when
optimized_required is true.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit dabc8b2075 ]
The dquot_mark_dquot_dirty() using dquot references from the inode
should be protected by dquot_srcu. quota_off code takes care to call
synchronize_srcu(&dquot_srcu) to not drop dquot references while they
are used by other users. But dquot_transfer() breaks this assumption.
We call dquot_transfer() to drop the last reference of dquot and add
it to free_dquots, but there may still be other users using the dquot
at this time, as shown in the function graph below:
cpu1 cpu2
_________________|_________________
wb_do_writeback CHOWN(1)
...
ext4_da_update_reserve_space
dquot_claim_block
...
dquot_mark_dquot_dirty // try to dirty old quota
test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags) // still ACTIVE
if (test_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
// test no dirty, wait dq_list_lock
...
dquot_transfer
__dquot_transfer
dqput_all(transfer_from) // rls old dquot
dqput // last dqput
dquot_release
clear_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)
atomic_dec(&dquot->dq_count)
put_dquot_last(dquot)
list_add_tail(&dquot->dq_free, &free_dquots)
// add the dquot to free_dquots
if (!test_and_set_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags))
add dqi_dirty_list // add released dquot to dirty_list
This can cause various issues, such as dquot being destroyed by
dqcache_shrink_scan() after being added to free_dquots, which can trigger
a UAF in dquot_mark_dquot_dirty(); or after dquot is added to free_dquots
and then to dirty_list, it is added to free_dquots again after
dquot_writeback_dquots() is executed, which causes the free_dquots list to
be corrupted and triggers a UAF when dqcache_shrink_scan() is called for
freeing dquot twice.
As Honza said, we need to fix dquot_transfer() to follow the guarantees
dquot_srcu should provide. But calling synchronize_srcu() directly from
dquot_transfer() is too expensive (and mostly unnecessary). So we add
dquot whose last reference should be dropped to the new global dquot
list releasing_dquots, and then queue work item which would call
synchronize_srcu() and after that perform the final cleanup of all the
dquots on releasing_dquots.
Fixes: 4580b30ea8 ("quota: Do not dirty bad dquots")
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230630110822.3881712-5-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4b9bdfa165 ]
Now we have a helper function dquot_dirty() to determine if dquot has
DQ_MOD_B bit. dquot_active() can easily be misunderstood as a helper
function to determine if dquot has DQ_ACTIVE_B bit. So we avoid this by
renaming it to inode_quota_active() and later on we will add the helper
function dquot_active() to determine if dquot has DQ_ACTIVE_B bit.
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-Id: <20230630110822.3881712-3-libaokun1@huawei.com>
Stable-dep-of: dabc8b2075 ("quota: fix dqput() to follow the guarantees dquot_srcu should provide")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
