mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-03-26 04:20:23 +09:00
f10aa9bc94de0aa334380b3903dd2f5ec1f48231
3156 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wander Lairson Costa
|
f9543375d9 |
bpf: Use raw_spinlock_t in ringbuf
commit 8b62645b09f870d70c7910e7550289d444239a46 upstream.
The function __bpf_ringbuf_reserve is invoked from a tracepoint, which
disables preemption. Using spinlock_t in this context can lead to a
"sleep in atomic" warning in the RT variant. This issue is illustrated
in the example below:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 556208, name: test_progs
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffd33a5c88ea44>] migrate_enable+0xc0/0x39c
CPU: 7 PID: 556208 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G
Hardware name: Qualcomm SA8775P Ride (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xac/0x130
show_stack+0x1c/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe8
dump_stack+0x18/0x30
__might_resched+0x3bc/0x4fc
rt_spin_lock+0x8c/0x1a4
__bpf_ringbuf_reserve+0xc4/0x254
bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr+0x5c/0xdc
bpf_prog_ac3d15160d62622a_test_read_write+0x104/0x238
trace_call_bpf+0x238/0x774
perf_call_bpf_enter.isra.0+0x104/0x194
perf_syscall_enter+0x2f8/0x510
trace_sys_enter+0x39c/0x564
syscall_trace_enter+0x220/0x3c0
do_el0_svc+0x138/0x1dc
el0_svc+0x54/0x130
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x134/0x150
el0t_64_sync+0x17c/0x180
Switch the spinlock to raw_spinlock_t to avoid this error.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Yan Zhai
|
586f011487 |
bpf: skip non exist keys in generic_map_lookup_batch
[ Upstream commit 5644c6b50ffee0a56c1e01430a8c88e34decb120 ]
The generic_map_lookup_batch currently returns EINTR if it fails with
ENOENT and retries several times on bpf_map_copy_value. The next batch
would start from the same location, presuming it's a transient issue.
This is incorrect if a map can actually have "holes", i.e.
"get_next_key" can return a key that does not point to a valid value. At
least the array of maps type may contain such holes legitly. Right now
these holes show up, generic batch lookup cannot proceed any more. It
will always fail with EINTR errors.
Rather, do not retry in generic_map_lookup_batch. If it finds a non
existing element, skip to the next key. This simple solution comes with
a price that transient errors may not be recovered, and the iteration
might cycle back to the first key under parallel deletion. For example,
Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> pointed out a following scenario:
For LPM trie map:
(1) ->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key) returns a valid key
(2) bpf_map_copy_value() return -ENOMENT
It means the key must be deleted concurrently.
(3) goto next_key
It swaps the prev_key and key
(4) ->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key) again
prev_key points to a non-existing key, for LPM trie it will treat just
like prev_key=NULL case, the returned key will be duplicated.
With the retry logic, the iteration can continue to the key next to the
deleted one. But if we directly skip to the next key, the iteration loop
would restart from the first key for the lpm_trie type.
However, not all races may be recovered. For example, if current key is
deleted after instead of before bpf_map_copy_value, or if the prev_key
also gets deleted, then the loop will still restart from the first key
for lpm_tire anyway. For generic lookup it might be better to stay
simple, i.e. just skip to the next key. To guarantee that the output
keys are not duplicated, it is better to implement map type specific
batch operations, which can properly lock the trie and synchronize with
concurrent mutators.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Abel Wu
|
6ecb9fa14e |
bpf: Fix deadlock when freeing cgroup storage
[ Upstream commit c78f4afbd962f43a3989f45f3ca04300252b19b5 ] The following commit |
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
29cfda62ab |
bpf: avoid holding freeze_mutex during mmap operation
[ Upstream commit bc27c52eea189e8f7492d40739b7746d67b65beb ]
We use map->freeze_mutex to prevent races between map_freeze() and
memory mapping BPF map contents with writable permissions. The way we
naively do this means we'll hold freeze_mutex for entire duration of all
the mm and VMA manipulations, which is completely unnecessary. This can
potentially also lead to deadlocks, as reported by syzbot in [0].
So, instead, hold freeze_mutex only during writeability checks, bump
(proactively) "write active" count for the map, unlock the mutex and
proceed with mmap logic. And only if something went wrong during mmap
logic, then undo that "write active" counter increment.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/678dcbc9.050a0220.303755.0066.GAE@google.com/
Fixes:
|
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
fc01ba0973 |
bpf: unify VM_WRITE vs VM_MAYWRITE use in BPF map mmaping logic
[ Upstream commit 98671a0fd1f14e4a518ee06b19037c20014900eb ]
For all BPF maps we ensure that VM_MAYWRITE is cleared when
memory-mapping BPF map contents as initially read-only VMA. This is
because in some cases BPF verifier relies on the underlying data to not
be modified afterwards by user space, so once something is mapped
read-only, it shouldn't be re-mmap'ed as read-write.
As such, it's not necessary to check VM_MAYWRITE in bpf_map_mmap() and
map->ops->map_mmap() callbacks: VM_WRITE should be consistently set for
read-write mappings, and if VM_WRITE is not set, there is no way for
user space to upgrade read-only mapping to read-write one.
This patch cleans up this VM_WRITE vs VM_MAYWRITE handling within
bpf_map_mmap(), which is an entry point for any BPF map mmap()-ing
logic. We also drop unnecessary sanitization of VM_MAYWRITE in BPF
ringbuf's map_mmap() callback implementation, as it is already performed
by common code in bpf_map_mmap().
Note, though, that in bpf_map_mmap_{open,close}() callbacks we can't
drop VM_MAYWRITE use, because it's possible (and is outside of
subsystem's control) to have initially read-write memory mapping, which
is subsequently dropped to read-only by user space through mprotect().
In such case, from BPF verifier POV it's read-write data throughout the
lifetime of BPF map, and is counted as "active writer".
But its VMAs will start out as VM_WRITE|VM_MAYWRITE, then mprotect() can
change it to just VM_MAYWRITE (and no VM_WRITE), so when its finally
munmap()'ed and bpf_map_mmap_close() is called, vm_flags will be just
VM_MAYWRITE, but we still need to decrement active writer count with
bpf_map_write_active_dec() as it's still considered to be a read-write
mapping by the rest of BPF subsystem.
Similar reasoning applies to bpf_map_mmap_open(), which is called
whenever mmap(), munmap(), and/or mprotect() forces mm subsystem to
split original VMA into multiple discontiguous VMAs.
Memory-mapping handling is a bit tricky, yes.
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250129012246.1515826-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: bc27c52eea18 ("bpf: avoid holding freeze_mutex during mmap operation")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Martin KaFai Lau
|
3392fa605d |
bpf: bpf_local_storage: Always use bpf_mem_alloc in PREEMPT_RT
[ Upstream commit 8eef6ac4d70eb1f0099fff93321d90ce8fa49ee1 ]
In PREEMPT_RT, kmalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) is still not safe in non preemptible
context. bpf_mem_alloc must be used in PREEMPT_RT. This patch is
to enforce bpf_mem_alloc in the bpf_local_storage when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
is enabled.
[ 35.118559] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[ 35.118566] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1832, name: test_progs
[ 35.118569] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[ 35.118571] RCU nest depth: 1, expected: 1
[ 35.118577] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
...
[ 35.118647] __might_resched+0x433/0x5b0
[ 35.118677] rt_spin_lock+0xc3/0x290
[ 35.118700] ___slab_alloc+0x72/0xc40
[ 35.118723] __kmalloc_noprof+0x13f/0x4e0
[ 35.118732] bpf_map_kzalloc+0xe5/0x220
[ 35.118740] bpf_selem_alloc+0x1d2/0x7b0
[ 35.118755] bpf_local_storage_update+0x2fa/0x8b0
[ 35.118784] bpf_sk_storage_get_tracing+0x15a/0x1d0
[ 35.118791] bpf_prog_9a118d86fca78ebb_trace_inet_sock_set_state+0x44/0x66
[ 35.118795] bpf_trace_run3+0x222/0x400
[ 35.118820] __bpf_trace_inet_sock_set_state+0x11/0x20
[ 35.118824] trace_inet_sock_set_state+0x112/0x130
[ 35.118830] inet_sk_state_store+0x41/0x90
[ 35.118836] tcp_set_state+0x3b3/0x640
There is no need to adjust the gfp_flags passing to the
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags() which only honors the GFP_KERNEL.
The verifier has ensured GFP_KERNEL is passed only in sleepable context.
It has been an old issue since the first introduction of the
bpf_local_storage ~5 years ago, so this patch targets the bpf-next.
bpf_mem_alloc is needed to solve it, so the Fixes tag is set
to the commit when bpf_mem_alloc was first used in the bpf_local_storage.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Shung-Hsi Yu
|
199f045287 |
Revert "bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking"
Revert commit |
||
|
Anton Protopopov
|
f53b37313a |
bpf: fix potential error return
[ Upstream commit c4441ca86afe4814039ee1b32c39d833c1a16bbc ] The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0 However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check. Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210114245.836164-1-aspsk@isovalent.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Eduard Zingerman
|
bfe9446ea1 |
bpf: sync_linked_regs() must preserve subreg_def
commit e9bd9c498cb0f5843996dbe5cbce7a1836a83c70 upstream.
Range propagation must not affect subreg_def marks, otherwise the
following example is rewritten by verifier incorrectly when
BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag is set:
0: call bpf_ktime_get_ns call bpf_ktime_get_ns
1: r0 &= 0x7fffffff after verifier r0 &= 0x7fffffff
2: w1 = w0 rewrites w1 = w0
3: if w0 < 10 goto +0 --------------> r11 = 0x2f5674a6 (r)
4: r1 >>= 32 r11 <<= 32 (r)
5: r0 = r1 r1 |= r11 (r)
6: exit; if w0 < 0xa goto pc+0
r1 >>= 32
r0 = r1
exit
(or zero extension of w1 at (2) is missing for architectures that
require zero extension for upper register half).
The following happens w/o this patch:
- r0 is marked as not a subreg at (0);
- w1 is marked as subreg at (2);
- w1 subreg_def is overridden at (3) by copy_register_state();
- w1 is read at (5) but mark_insn_zext() does not mark (2)
for zero extension, because w1 subreg_def is not set;
- because of BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 flag verifier inserts random
value for hi32 bits of (2) (marked (r));
- this random value is read at (5).
Fixes:
|
||
|
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
|
c7e1962a38 |
bpf: Check size for BTF-based ctx access of pointer members
commit 659b9ba7cb2d7adb64618b87ddfaa528a143766e upstream.
Robert Morris reported the following program type which passes the
verifier in [0]:
SEC("struct_ops/bpf_cubic_init")
void BPF_PROG(bpf_cubic_init, struct sock *sk)
{
asm volatile("r2 = *(u16*)(r1 + 0)"); // verifier should demand u64
asm volatile("*(u32 *)(r2 +1504) = 0"); // 1280 in some configs
}
The second line may or may not work, but the first instruction shouldn't
pass, as it's a narrow load into the context structure of the struct ops
callback. The code falls back to btf_ctx_access to ensure correctness
and obtaining the types of pointers. Ensure that the size of the access
is correctly checked to be 8 bytes, otherwise the verifier thinks the
narrow load obtained a trusted BTF pointer and will permit loads/stores
as it sees fit.
Perform the check on size after we've verified that the load is for a
pointer field, as for scalar values narrow loads are fine. Access to
structs passed as arguments to a BPF program are also treated as
scalars, therefore no adjustment is needed in their case.
Existing verifier selftests are broken by this change, but because they
were incorrect. Verifier tests for d_path were performing narrow load
into context to obtain path pointer, had this program actually run it
would cause a crash. The same holds for verifier_btf_ctx_access tests.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/51338.1732985814@localhost
Fixes:
|
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
5fe23c57ab |
bpf: put bpf_link's program when link is safe to be deallocated
[ Upstream commit f44ec8733a8469143fde1984b5e6931b2e2f6f3f ] In general, BPF link's underlying BPF program should be considered to be reachable through attach hook -> link -> prog chain, and, pessimistically, we have to assume that as long as link's memory is not safe to free, attach hook's code might hold a pointer to BPF program and use it. As such, it's not (generally) correct to put link's program early before waiting for RCU GPs to go through. More eager bpf_prog_put() that we currently do is mostly correct due to BPF program's release code doing similar RCU GP waiting, but as will be shown in the following patches, BPF program can be non-sleepable (and, thus, reliant on only "classic" RCU GP), while BPF link's attach hook can have sleepable semantics and needs to be protected by RCU Tasks Trace, and for such cases BPF link has to go through RCU Tasks Trace + "classic" RCU GPs before being deallocated. And so, if we put BPF program early, we might free BPF program before we free BPF link, leading to use-after-free situation. So, this patch defers bpf_prog_put() until we are ready to perform bpf_link's deallocation. At worst, this delays BPF program freeing by one extra RCU GP, but that seems completely acceptable. Alternatively, we'd need more elaborate ways to determine BPF hook, BPF link, and BPF program lifetimes, and how they relate to each other, which seems like an unnecessary complication. Note, for most BPF links we still will perform eager bpf_prog_put() and link dealloc, so for those BPF links there are no observable changes whatsoever. Only BPF links that use deferred dealloc might notice slightly delayed freeing of BPF programs. Also, to reduce code and logic duplication, extract program put + link dealloc logic into bpf_link_dealloc() helper. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20241101181754.782341-1-andrii@kernel.org Tested-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Hou Tao
|
10e8a2dec9 |
bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket()
[ Upstream commit b9e9ed90b10c82a4e9d4d70a2890f06bfcdd3b78 ] For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However, bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock (raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock (spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted ----------------------------- test_maps/4881 is trying to lock: ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by test_maps/4881: #0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270 #1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0 lock_acquire+0x182/0x450 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70 bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110 bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0 free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380 __sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60 x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is still a spinlock. Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion. Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map. There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr: (1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(), because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems. It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old element as well. (2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(), htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(). For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these elements have been removed from the hash llist. Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation, __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept it as is. (3) fd_htab_map_free() It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t. (4) bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem() It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t. After moving free_htab_elem() outside htab bucket lock scope, using pcpu_freelist_push() instead of __pcpu_freelist_push() to disable the irq before freeing elements, and protecting the invocations of bpf_mem_cache_free() with migrate_{disable|enable} pair. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241106063542.357743-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Maciej Fijalkowski
|
8e85893069 |
bpf: fix OOB devmap writes when deleting elements
commit ab244dd7cf4c291f82faacdc50b45cc0f55b674d upstream.
Jordy reported issue against XSKMAP which also applies to DEVMAP - the
index used for accessing map entry, due to being a signed integer,
causes the OOB writes. Fix is simple as changing the type from int to
u32, however, when compared to XSKMAP case, one more thing needs to be
addressed.
When map is released from system via dev_map_free(), we iterate through
all of the entries and an iterator variable is also an int, which
implies OOB accesses. Again, change it to be u32.
Example splat below:
[ 160.724676] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2c001000
[ 160.731662] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 160.736876] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 160.742095] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 160.744678] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 160.749106] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 520 Comm: kworker/u145:12 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #487
[ 160.757050] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
[ 160.767642] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred
[ 160.773308] RIP: 0010:dev_map_free+0x77/0x170
[ 160.777735] Code: 00 e8 fd 91 ed ff e8 b8 73 ed ff 41 83 7d 18 19 74 6e 41 8b 45 24 49 8b bd f8 00 00 00 31 db 85 c0 74 48 48 63 c3 48 8d 04 c7 <48> 8b 28 48 85 ed 74 30 48 8b 7d 18 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 b3 52 fa ff
[ 160.796777] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000ee1fe38 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 160.802086] RAX: ffffc8fc2c001000 RBX: 0000000080000000 RCX: 0000000000000024
[ 160.809331] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: ffffc9002c001000
[ 160.816576] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000023 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 160.823823] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000000ee6b2 R12: dead000000000122
[ 160.831066] R13: ffff88810c928e00 R14: ffff8881002df405 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 160.838310] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8897e0c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 160.846528] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 160.852357] CR2: ffffc8fc2c001000 CR3: 0000000005c32006 CR4: 00000000007726f0
[ 160.859604] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 160.866847] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 160.874092] PKRU: 55555554
[ 160.876847] Call Trace:
[ 160.879338] <TASK>
[ 160.881477] ? __die+0x20/0x60
[ 160.884586] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x450
[ 160.888746] ? search_extable+0x22/0x30
[ 160.892647] ? search_bpf_extables+0x5f/0x80
[ 160.896988] ? exc_page_fault+0xa9/0x140
[ 160.900973] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
[ 160.905232] ? dev_map_free+0x77/0x170
[ 160.909043] ? dev_map_free+0x58/0x170
[ 160.912857] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x51/0x90
[ 160.917196] process_one_work+0x142/0x370
[ 160.921272] worker_thread+0x29e/0x3b0
[ 160.925082] ? rescuer_thread+0x4b0/0x4b0
[ 160.929157] kthread+0xd4/0x110
[ 160.932355] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[ 160.936079] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
[ 160.943396] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[ 160.950803] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 160.958482] </TASK>
Fixes:
|
||
|
Hou Tao
|
68570b5c89 |
bpf: Fix exact match conditions in trie_get_next_key()
[ Upstream commit 27abc7b3fa2e09bbe41e2924d328121546865eda ]
trie_get_next_key() uses node->prefixlen == key->prefixlen to identify
an exact match, However, it is incorrect because when the target key
doesn't fully match the found node (e.g., node->prefixlen != matchlen),
these two nodes may also have the same prefixlen. It will return
expected result when the passed key exist in the trie. However when a
recently-deleted key or nonexistent key is passed to
trie_get_next_key(), it may skip keys and return incorrect result.
Fix it by using node->prefixlen == matchlen to identify exact matches.
When the condition is true after the search, it also implies
node->prefixlen equals key->prefixlen, otherwise, the search would
return NULL instead.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Hou Tao
|
2e9ff3f483 |
bpf: Handle in-place update for full LPM trie correctly
[ Upstream commit 532d6b36b2bfac5514426a97a4df8d103d700d43 ]
When a LPM trie is full, in-place updates of existing elements
incorrectly return -ENOSPC.
Fix this by deferring the check of trie->n_entries. For new insertions,
n_entries must not exceed max_entries. However, in-place updates are
allowed even when the trie is full.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Hou Tao
|
c1ab31edd2 |
bpf: Remove unnecessary kfree(im_node) in lpm_trie_update_elem
[ Upstream commit 3d5611b4d7efbefb85a74fcdbc35c603847cc022 ] There is no need to call kfree(im_node) when updating element fails, because im_node must be NULL. Remove the unnecessary kfree() for im_node. Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241206110622.1161752-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: 532d6b36b2bf ("bpf: Handle in-place update for full LPM trie correctly") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Hou Tao
|
c5325e6e4b |
bpf: Handle BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST for LPM trie
[ Upstream commit eae6a075e9537dd69891cf77ca5a88fa8a28b4a1 ]
Add the currently missing handling for the BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST
flags. These flags can be specified by users and are relevant since LPM
trie supports exact matches during update.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Tao Lyu
|
c169daf3cf |
bpf: Fix narrow scalar spill onto 64-bit spilled scalar slots
[ Upstream commit b0e66977dc072906bb76555fb1a64261d7f63d0f ] When CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN (allow_ptr_leaks) are disabled, the verifier aims to reject partial overwrite on an 8-byte stack slot that contains a spilled pointer. However, in such a scenario, it rejects all partial stack overwrites as long as the targeted stack slot is a spilled register, because it does not check if the stack slot is a spilled pointer. Incomplete checks will result in the rejection of valid programs, which spill narrower scalar values onto scalar slots, as shown below. 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; asm volatile ( @ repro.bpf.c:679 0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 1 ; R10=fp0 fp-8_w=1 1: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = 1 attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack processed 2 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0. Fix this by expanding the check to not consider spilled scalar registers when rejecting the write into the stack. Previous discussion on this patch is at link [0]. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240403202409.2615469-1-tao.lyu@epfl.ch Fixes: ab125ed3ec1c ("bpf: fix check for attempt to corrupt spilled pointer") Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@epfl.ch> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241204044757.1483141-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Andrii Nakryiko
|
ecc2aeeaa0 |
bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking
[ Upstream commit 41f6f64e6999a837048b1bd13a2f8742964eca6b ] Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it *and* potentially adjusting offset. To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction history. We don't touch idx field for maximum performance, as it's checked most frequently during backtracking. This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of verified states, explored in the subsequent patches. There are only three differences in selftests' BPF object files according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states). File Program Insns (A) Insns (B) Insns (DIFF) States (A) States (B) States (DIFF) -------------------------------------- ------------- --------- --------- ------------- ---------- ---------- ------------- test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o cls_redirect 2987 2864 -123 (-4.12%) 240 231 -9 (-3.75%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_tc 82848 82661 -187 (-0.23%) 5107 5073 -34 (-0.67%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o syncookie_xdp 85116 84964 -152 (-0.18%) 5162 5130 -32 (-0.62%) Note, I avoided renaming jmp_history to more generic insn_hist to minimize number of lines changed and potential merge conflicts between bpf and bpf-next trees. Notice also cur_hist_entry pointer reset to NULL at the beginning of instruction verification loop. This pointer avoids the problem of relying on last jump history entry's insn_idx to determine whether we already have entry for current instruction or not. It can happen that we added jump history entry because current instruction is_jmp_point(), but also we need to add instruction flags for stack access. In this case, we don't want to entries, so we need to reuse last added entry, if it is present. Relying on insn_idx comparison has the same ambiguity problem as the one that was fixed recently in [0], so we avoid that. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org/ Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Reported-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@epfl.ch> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Hou Tao
|
d5092b0a1a |
bpf: Check validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo()
[ Upstream commit 8421d4c8762bd022cb491f2f0f7019ef51b4f0a7 ] If a newly-added link type doesn't invoke BPF_LINK_TYPE(), accessing bpf_link_type_strs[link->type] may result in an out-of-bounds access. To spot such missed invocations early in the future, checking the validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() and emitting a warning when such invocations are missed. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241024013558.1135167-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Rik van Riel
|
d22f177935 |
bpf: use kvzmalloc to allocate BPF verifier environment
[ Upstream commit 434247637c66e1be2bc71a9987d4c3f0d8672387 ] The kzmalloc call in bpf_check can fail when memory is very fragmented, which in turn can lead to an OOM kill. Use kvzmalloc to fall back to vmalloc when memory is too fragmented to allocate an order 3 sized bpf verifier environment. Admittedly this is not a very common case, and only happens on systems where memory has already been squeezed close to the limit, but this does not seem like much of a hot path, and it's a simple enough fix. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241008170735.16766766@imladris.surriel.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Chen Ridong
|
0d86cd70fc |
cgroup/bpf: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup bpf destruction
[ Upstream commit 117932eea99b729ee5d12783601a4f7f5fd58a23 ]
A hung_task problem shown below was found:
INFO: task kworker/0:0:8 blocked for more than 327 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Workqueue: events cgroup_bpf_release
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x5a2/0x2050
? find_held_lock+0x33/0x100
? wq_worker_sleeping+0x9e/0xe0
schedule+0x9f/0x180
schedule_preempt_disabled+0x25/0x50
__mutex_lock+0x512/0x740
? cgroup_bpf_release+0x1e/0x4d0
? cgroup_bpf_release+0xcf/0x4d0
? process_scheduled_works+0x161/0x8a0
? cgroup_bpf_release+0x1e/0x4d0
? mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
? __pfx_delay_tsc+0x10/0x10
mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
cgroup_bpf_release+0xcf/0x4d0
? process_scheduled_works+0x161/0x8a0
? trace_event_raw_event_workqueue_execute_start+0x64/0xd0
? process_scheduled_works+0x161/0x8a0
process_scheduled_works+0x23a/0x8a0
worker_thread+0x231/0x5b0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x14d/0x1c0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x59/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
This issue can be reproduced by the following pressuse test:
1. A large number of cpuset cgroups are deleted.
2. Set cpu on and off repeatly.
3. Set watchdog_thresh repeatly.
The scripts can be obtained at LINK mentioned above the signature.
The reason for this issue is cgroup_mutex and cpu_hotplug_lock are
acquired in different tasks, which may lead to deadlock.
It can lead to a deadlock through the following steps:
1. A large number of cpusets are deleted asynchronously, which puts a
large number of cgroup_bpf_release works into system_wq. The max_active
of system_wq is WQ_DFL_ACTIVE(256). Consequently, all active works are
cgroup_bpf_release works, and many cgroup_bpf_release works will be put
into inactive queue. As illustrated in the diagram, there are 256 (in
the acvtive queue) + n (in the inactive queue) works.
2. Setting watchdog_thresh will hold cpu_hotplug_lock.read and put
smp_call_on_cpu work into system_wq. However step 1 has already filled
system_wq, 'sscs.work' is put into inactive queue. 'sscs.work' has
to wait until the works that were put into the inacvtive queue earlier
have executed (n cgroup_bpf_release), so it will be blocked for a while.
3. Cpu offline requires cpu_hotplug_lock.write, which is blocked by step 2.
4. Cpusets that were deleted at step 1 put cgroup_release works into
cgroup_destroy_wq. They are competing to get cgroup_mutex all the time.
When cgroup_metux is acqured by work at css_killed_work_fn, it will
call cpuset_css_offline, which needs to acqure cpu_hotplug_lock.read.
However, cpuset_css_offline will be blocked for step 3.
5. At this moment, there are 256 works in active queue that are
cgroup_bpf_release, they are attempting to acquire cgroup_mutex, and as
a result, all of them are blocked. Consequently, sscs.work can not be
executed. Ultimately, this situation leads to four processes being
blocked, forming a deadlock.
system_wq(step1) WatchDog(step2) cpu offline(step3) cgroup_destroy_wq(step4)
...
2000+ cgroups deleted asyn
256 actives + n inactives
__lockup_detector_reconfigure
P(cpu_hotplug_lock.read)
put sscs.work into system_wq
256 + n + 1(sscs.work)
sscs.work wait to be executed
warting sscs.work finish
percpu_down_write
P(cpu_hotplug_lock.write)
...blocking...
css_killed_work_fn
P(cgroup_mutex)
cpuset_css_offline
P(cpu_hotplug_lock.read)
...blocking...
256 cgroup_bpf_release
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
..blocking...
To fix the problem, place cgroup_bpf_release works on a dedicated
workqueue which can break the loop and solve the problem. System wqs are
for misc things which shouldn't create a large number of concurrent work
items. If something is going to generate >WQ_DFL_ACTIVE(256) concurrent
work items, it should use its own dedicated workqueue.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Byeonguk Jeong
|
90a6e0e1e1 |
bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
[ Upstream commit 13400ac8fb80c57c2bfb12ebd35ee121ce9b4d21 ]
trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen,
while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has
full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with
max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ...
0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with
.prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Eduard Zingerman
|
e20459b5f6 |
bpf: Force checkpoint when jmp history is too long
[ Upstream commit aa30eb3260b2dea3a68d3c42a39f9a09c5e99cee ]
A specifically crafted program might trick verifier into growing very
long jump history within a single bpf_verifier_state instance.
Very long jump history makes mark_chain_precision() unreasonably slow,
especially in case if verifier processes a loop.
Mitigate this by forcing new state in is_state_visited() in case if
current state's jump history is too long.
Use same constant as in `skip_inf_loop_check`, but multiply it by
arbitrarily chosen value 2 to account for jump history containing not
only information about jumps, but also information about stack access.
For an example of problematic program consider the code below,
w/o this patch the example is processed by verifier for ~15 minutes,
before failing to allocate big-enough chunk for jmp_history.
0: r7 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0);"
1: r7 += 0x1ab064b9;"
2: if r7 & 0x702000 goto 1b;
3: r7 &= 0x1ee60e;"
4: r7 += r1;"
5: if r7 s> 0x37d2 goto +0;"
6: r0 = 0;"
7: exit;"
Perf profiling shows that most of the time is spent in
mark_chain_precision() ~95%.
The easiest way to explain why this program causes problems is to
apply the following patch:
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 0c216e71cec7..4b4823961abe 100644
\--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
\+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
\@@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@ struct bpf_array {
};
};
-#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 1000000 /* yes. 1M insns */
+#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 256 /* yes. 1M insns */
#define MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT 33
/* Maximum number of loops for bpf_loop and bpf_iter_num.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f514247ba8ba..75e88be3bb3e 100644
\--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
\+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
\@@ -18024,8 +18024,13 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
skip_inf_loop_check:
if (!force_new_state &&
env->jmps_processed - env->prev_jmps_processed < 20 &&
- env->insn_processed - env->prev_insn_processed < 100)
+ env->insn_processed - env->prev_insn_processed < 100) {
+ verbose(env, "is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at %d, %d jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is %d\n",
+ env->insn_idx,
+ env->jmps_processed - env->prev_jmps_processed,
+ cur->jmp_history_cnt);
add_new_state = false;
+ }
goto miss;
}
/* If sl->state is a part of a loop and this loop's entry is a part of
\@@ -18142,6 +18147,9 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
if (!add_new_state)
return 0;
+ verbose(env, "is_state_visited: new checkpoint at %d, resetting env->jmps_processed\n",
+ env->insn_idx);
+
/* There were no equivalent states, remember the current one.
* Technically the current state is not proven to be safe yet,
* but it will either reach outer most bpf_exit (which means it's safe)
And observe verification log:
...
is_state_visited: new checkpoint at 5, resetting env->jmps_processed
5: R1=ctx() R7=ctx(...)
5: (65) if r7 s> 0x37d2 goto pc+0 ; R7=ctx(...)
6: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
7: (95) exit
from 5 to 6: R1=ctx() R7=ctx(...) R10=fp0
6: R1=ctx() R7=ctx(...) R10=fp0
6: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
7: (95) exit
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 1, 3 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 74
from 2 to 1: R1=ctx() R7_w=scalar(...) R10=fp0
1: R1=ctx() R7_w=scalar(...) R10=fp0
1: (07) r7 += 447767737
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 2, 3 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 75
2: R7_w=scalar(...)
2: (45) if r7 & 0x702000 goto pc-2
... mark_precise 152 steps for r7 ...
2: R7_w=scalar(...)
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 1, 4 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 75
1: (07) r7 += 447767737
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 2, 4 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 76
2: R7_w=scalar(...)
2: (45) if r7 & 0x702000 goto pc-2
...
BPF program is too large. Processed 257 insn
The log output shows that checkpoint at label (1) is never created,
because it is suppressed by `skip_inf_loop_check` logic:
a. When 'if' at (2) is processed it pushes a state with insn_idx (1)
onto stack and proceeds to (3);
b. At (5) checkpoint is created, and this resets
env->{jmps,insns}_processed.
c. Verification proceeds and reaches `exit`;
d. State saved at step (a) is popped from stack and is_state_visited()
considers if checkpoint needs to be added, but because
env->{jmps,insns}_processed had been just reset at step (b)
the `skip_inf_loop_check` logic forces `add_new_state` to false.
e. Verifier proceeds with current state, which slowly accumulates
more and more entries in the jump history.
The accumulation of entries in the jump history is a problem because
of two factors:
- it eventually exhausts memory available for kmalloc() allocation;
- mark_chain_precision() traverses the jump history of a state,
meaning that if `r7` is marked precise, verifier would iterate
ever growing jump history until parent state boundary is reached.
(note: the log also shows a REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION warning
upon jset processing, but that's another bug to fix).
With this patch applied, the example above is rejected by verifier
under 1s of time, reaching 1M instructions limit.
The program is a simplified reproducer from syzbot report.
Previous discussion could be found at [1].
The patch does not cause any changes in verification performance,
when tested on selftests from veristat.cfg and cilium programs taken
from [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241009021254.2805446-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
[2] https://github.com/anakryiko/cilium
Changelog:
- v1 -> v2:
- moved patch to bpf tree;
- moved force_new_state variable initialization after declaration and
shortened the comment.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241018020307.1766906-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
Fixes:
|
||
|
Daniel Borkmann
|
48068ccaea |
bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning
[ Upstream commit 8ea607330a39184f51737c6ae706db7fdca7628e ]
Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg()
has the following code:
if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off))
/* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw
* mode so that the program is required to
* initialize all the memory that the helper could
* just partially fill up.
*/
meta = NULL;
This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the
size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF
program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example,
.rodata global maps.
The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer
to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back
in commit
|
||
|
Daniel Borkmann
|
8a33a047bd |
bpf: Add MEM_WRITE attribute
[ Upstream commit 6fad274f06f038c29660aa53fbad14241c9fd976 ]
Add a MEM_WRITE attribute for BPF helper functions which can be used in
bpf_func_proto to annotate an argument type in order to let the verifier
know that the helper writes into the memory passed as an argument. In
the past MEM_UNINIT has been (ab)used for this function, but the latter
merely tells the verifier that the passed memory can be uninitialized.
There have been bugs with overloading the latter but aside from that
there are also cases where the passed memory is read + written which
currently cannot be expressed, see also 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former
ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241021152809.33343-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 8ea607330a39 ("bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Andrei Matei
|
d1100acab4 |
bpf: Simplify checking size of helper accesses
[ Upstream commit 8a021e7fa10576eeb3938328f39bbf98fe7d4715 ] This patch simplifies the verification of size arguments associated to pointer arguments to helpers and kfuncs. Many helpers take a pointer argument followed by the size of the memory access performed to be performed through that pointer. Before this patch, the handling of the size argument in check_mem_size_reg() was confusing and wasteful: if the size register's lower bound was 0, then the verification was done twice: once considering the size of the access to be the lower-bound of the respective argument, and once considering the upper bound (even if the two are the same). The upper bound checking is a super-set of the lower-bound checking(*), except: the only point of the lower-bound check is to handle the case where zero-sized-accesses are explicitly not allowed and the lower-bound is zero. This static condition is now checked explicitly, replacing a much more complex, expensive and confusing verification call to check_helper_mem_access(). Error messages change in this patch. Before, messages about illegal zero-size accesses depended on the type of the pointer and on other conditions, and sometimes the message was plain wrong: in some tests that changed you'll see that the old message was something like "R1 min value is outside of the allowed memory range", where R1 is the pointer register; the error was wrongly claiming that the pointer was bad instead of the size being bad. Other times the information that the size came for a register with a possible range of values was wrong, and the error presented the size as a fixed zero. Now the errors refer to the right register. However, the old error messages did contain useful information about the pointer register which is now lost; recovering this information was deemed not important enough. (*) Besides standing to reason that the checks for a bigger size access are a super-set of the checks for a smaller size access, I have also mechanically verified this by reading the code for all types of pointers. I could convince myself that it's true for all but PTR_TO_BTF_ID (check_ptr_to_btf_access). There, simply looking line-by-line does not immediately prove what we want. If anyone has any qualms, let me know. Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221232225.568730-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com Stable-dep-of: 8ea607330a39 ("bpf: Fix overloading of MEM_UNINIT's meaning") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Jordan Rome
|
bb0f943675 |
bpf: Fix iter/task tid filtering
[ Upstream commit 9495a5b731fcaf580448a3438d63601c88367661 ]
In userspace, you can add a tid filter by setting
the "task.tid" field for "bpf_iter_link_info".
However, `get_pid_task` when called for the
`BPF_TASK_ITER_TID` type should have been using
`PIDTYPE_PID` (tid) instead of `PIDTYPE_TGID` (pid).
Fixes:
|
||
|
Dimitar Kanaliev
|
08b8f206de |
bpf: Fix truncation bug in coerce_reg_to_size_sx()
[ Upstream commit ae67b9fb8c4e981e929a665dcaa070f4b05ebdb4 ]
coerce_reg_to_size_sx() updates the register state after a sign-extension
operation. However, there's a bug in the assignment order of the unsigned
min/max values, leading to incorrect truncation:
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar()
1: (57) r0 &= 1 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))
2: (07) r0 += 254 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=254,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0xfe; 0x1))
3: (bf) r0 = (s8)r0 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-2,smax=smax32=-1,umin=umin32=0xfffffffe,umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0xfffffffffffffffe; 0x1))
In the current implementation, the unsigned 32-bit min/max values
(u32_min_value and u32_max_value) are assigned directly from the 64-bit
signed min/max values (s64_min and s64_max):
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = s64_min;
reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value = s64_max;
Due to the chain assigmnent, this is equivalent to:
reg->u32_min_value = s64_min; // Unintended truncation
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value;
reg->u32_max_value = s64_max; // Unintended truncation
reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value;
Fixes:
|
||
|
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
|
3e212996d2 |
bpf: fix kfunc btf caching for modules
[ Upstream commit 6cb86a0fdece87e126323ec1bb19deb16a52aedf ]
The verifier contains a cache for looking up module BTF objects when
calling kfuncs defined in modules. This cache uses a 'struct
bpf_kfunc_btf_tab', which contains a sorted list of BTF objects that
were already seen in the current verifier run, and the BTF objects are
looked up by the offset stored in the relocated call instruction using
bsearch().
The first time a given offset is seen, the module BTF is loaded from the
file descriptor passed in by libbpf, and stored into the cache. However,
there's a bug in the code storing the new entry: it stores a pointer to
the new cache entry, then calls sort() to keep the cache sorted for the
next lookup using bsearch(), and then returns the entry that was just
stored through the stored pointer. However, because sort() modifies the
list of entries in place *by value*, the stored pointer may no longer
point to the right entry, in which case the wrong BTF object will be
returned.
The end result of this is an intermittent bug where, if a BPF program
calls two functions with the same signature in two different modules,
the function from the wrong module may sometimes end up being called.
Whether this happens depends on the order of the calls in the BPF
program (as that affects whether sort() reorders the array of BTF
objects), making it especially hard to track down. Simon, credited as
reporter below, spent significant effort analysing and creating a
reproducer for this issue. The reproducer is added as a selftest in a
subsequent patch.
The fix is straight forward: simply don't use the stored pointer after
calling sort(). Since we already have an on-stack pointer to the BTF
object itself at the point where the function return, just use that, and
populate it from the cache entry in the branch where the lookup
succeeds.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Tyrone Wu
|
e5c2b971db |
bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info
[ Upstream commit 4deecdd29cf29844c7bd164d72dc38d2e672f64e ]
Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the
kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This
behavior was inconsistent with how other input/output string buffer
fields function (e.g. `raw_tracepoint.tp_name_len`).
This patch fills `name_len` with the actual size of the string name.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Jiri Olsa
|
cfd63c3a45 |
bpf: Add cookie to perf_event bpf_link_info records
[ Upstream commit d5c16492c66fbfca85f36e42363d32212df5927b ] At the moment we don't store cookie for perf_event probes, while we do that for the rest of the probes. Adding cookie fields to struct bpf_link_info perf event probe records: perf_event.uprobe perf_event.kprobe perf_event.tracepoint perf_event.perf_event And the code to store that in bpf_link_info struct. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240119110505.400573-2-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: 4deecdd29cf2 ("bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Jiri Olsa
|
99bf10e92a |
bpf: Add missed value to kprobe perf link info
[ Upstream commit 3acf8ace68230e9558cf916847f1cc9f208abdf1 ] Add missed value to kprobe attached through perf link info to hold the stats of missed kprobe handler execution. The kprobe's missed counter gets incremented when kprobe handler is not executed due to another kprobe running on the same cpu. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230920213145.1941596-4-jolsa@kernel.org Stable-dep-of: 4deecdd29cf2 ("bpf: fix unpopulated name_len field in perf_event link info") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Jiri Olsa
|
90ad4e2fe3 |
bpf: Fix memory leak in bpf_core_apply
[ Upstream commit 45126b155e3b5201179cdc038504bf93a8ccd921 ]
We need to free specs properly.
Fixes: 3d2786d65aaa ("bpf: correctly handle malformed BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relos")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241007160958.607434-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Florian Kauer
|
49454f0993 |
bpf: devmap: provide rxq after redirect
[ Upstream commit ca9984c5f0ab3690d98b13937b2485a978c8dd73 ]
rxq contains a pointer to the device from where
the redirect happened. Currently, the BPF program
that was executed after a redirect via BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP*
does not have it set.
This is particularly bad since accessing ingress_ifindex, e.g.
SEC("xdp")
int prog(struct xdp_md *pkt)
{
return bpf_redirect_map(&dev_redirect_map, 0, 0);
}
SEC("xdp/devmap")
int prog_after_redirect(struct xdp_md *pkt)
{
bpf_printk("ifindex %i", pkt->ingress_ifindex);
return XDP_PASS;
}
depends on access to rxq, so a NULL pointer gets dereferenced:
<1>[ 574.475170] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000
<1>[ 574.475188] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
<1>[ 574.475194] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
<6>[ 574.475199] PGD 0 P4D 0
<4>[ 574.475207] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
<4>[ 574.475217] CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc5-reduced-00859-g780801200300 #23
<4>[ 574.475226] Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC13ANHi7/NUC13ANBi7, BIOS ANRPL357.0026.2023.0314.1458 03/14/2023
<4>[ 574.475231] Workqueue: mld mld_ifc_work
<4>[ 574.475247] RIP: 0010:bpf_prog_5e13354d9cf5018a_prog_after_redirect+0x17/0x3c
<4>[ 574.475257] Code: cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 80 00 00 00 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc f3 0f 1e fa 0f 1f 44 00 00 66 90 55 48 89 e5 f3 0f 1e fa 48 8b 57 20 <48> 8b 52 00 8b 92 e0 00 00 00 48 bf f8 a6 d5 c4 5d a0 ff ff be 0b
<4>[ 574.475263] RSP: 0018:ffffa62440280c98 EFLAGS: 00010206
<4>[ 574.475269] RAX: ffffa62440280cd8 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000
<4>[ 574.475274] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffa62440549048 RDI: ffffa62440280ce0
<4>[ 574.475278] RBP: ffffa62440280c98 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000001
<4>[ 574.475281] R10: ffffa05dc8b98000 R11: ffffa05f577fca40 R12: ffffa05dcab24000
<4>[ 574.475285] R13: ffffa62440280ce0 R14: ffffa62440549048 R15: ffffa62440549000
<4>[ 574.475289] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa05f4f700000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4>[ 574.475294] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4>[ 574.475298] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000025522e000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0
<4>[ 574.475303] PKRU: 55555554
<4>[ 574.475306] Call Trace:
<4>[ 574.475313] <IRQ>
<4>[ 574.475318] ? __die+0x23/0x70
<4>[ 574.475329] ? page_fault_oops+0x180/0x4c0
<4>[ 574.475339] ? skb_pp_cow_data+0x34c/0x490
<4>[ 574.475346] ? kmem_cache_free+0x257/0x280
<4>[ 574.475357] ? exc_page_fault+0x67/0x150
<4>[ 574.475368] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
<4>[ 574.475381] ? bpf_prog_5e13354d9cf5018a_prog_after_redirect+0x17/0x3c
<4>[ 574.475386] bq_xmit_all+0x158/0x420
<4>[ 574.475397] __dev_flush+0x30/0x90
<4>[ 574.475407] veth_poll+0x216/0x250 [veth]
<4>[ 574.475421] __napi_poll+0x28/0x1c0
<4>[ 574.475430] net_rx_action+0x32d/0x3a0
<4>[ 574.475441] handle_softirqs+0xcb/0x2c0
<4>[ 574.475451] do_softirq+0x40/0x60
<4>[ 574.475458] </IRQ>
<4>[ 574.475461] <TASK>
<4>[ 574.475464] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x66/0x70
<4>[ 574.475471] __dev_queue_xmit+0x268/0xe40
<4>[ 574.475480] ? selinux_ip_postroute+0x213/0x420
<4>[ 574.475491] ? alloc_skb_with_frags+0x4a/0x1d0
<4>[ 574.475502] ip6_finish_output2+0x2be/0x640
<4>[ 574.475512] ? nf_hook_slow+0x42/0xf0
<4>[ 574.475521] ip6_finish_output+0x194/0x300
<4>[ 574.475529] ? __pfx_ip6_finish_output+0x10/0x10
<4>[ 574.475538] mld_sendpack+0x17c/0x240
<4>[ 574.475548] mld_ifc_work+0x192/0x410
<4>[ 574.475557] process_one_work+0x15d/0x380
<4>[ 574.475566] worker_thread+0x29d/0x3a0
<4>[ 574.475573] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
<4>[ 574.475580] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
<4>[ 574.475587] kthread+0xcd/0x100
<4>[ 574.475597] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
<4>[ 574.475606] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
<4>[ 574.475615] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
<4>[ 574.475623] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
<4>[ 574.475635] </TASK>
<4>[ 574.475637] Modules linked in: veth br_netfilter bridge stp llc iwlmvm x86_pkg_temp_thermal iwlwifi efivarfs nvme nvme_core
<4>[ 574.475662] CR2: 0000000000000000
<4>[ 574.475668] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Therefore, provide it to the program by setting rxq properly.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Xu Kuohai
|
5d5e3b4cbe |
bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks
[ Upstream commit 28ead3eaabc16ecc907cfb71876da028080f6356 ] bpf progs can be attached to kernel functions, and the attached functions can take different parameters or return different return values. If prog attached to one kernel function tail calls prog attached to another kernel function, the ctx access or return value verification could be bypassed. For example, if prog1 is attached to func1 which takes only 1 parameter and prog2 is attached to func2 which takes two parameters. Since verifier assumes the bpf ctx passed to prog2 is constructed based on func2's prototype, verifier allows prog2 to access the second parameter from the bpf ctx passed to it. The problem is that verifier does not prevent prog1 from passing its bpf ctx to prog2 via tail call. In this case, the bpf ctx passed to prog2 is constructed from func1 instead of func2, that is, the assumption for ctx access verification is bypassed. Another example, if BPF LSM prog1 is attached to hook file_alloc_security, and BPF LSM prog2 is attached to hook bpf_lsm_audit_rule_known. Verifier knows the return value rules for these two hooks, e.g. it is legal for bpf_lsm_audit_rule_known to return positive number 1, and it is illegal for file_alloc_security to return positive number. So verifier allows prog2 to return positive number 1, but does not allow prog1 to return positive number. The problem is that verifier does not prevent prog1 from calling prog2 via tail call. In this case, prog2's return value 1 will be used as the return value for prog1's hook file_alloc_security. That is, the return value rule is bypassed. This patch adds restriction for tail call to prevent such bypasses. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240719110059.797546-4-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Tao Chen
|
c43622d6f9 |
bpf: Check percpu map value size first
[ Upstream commit 1d244784be6b01162b732a5a7d637dfc024c3203 ] Percpu map is often used, but the map value size limit often ignored, like issue: https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/2519. Actually, percpu map value size is bound by PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE, so we can check the value size whether it exceeds PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE first, like percpu map of local_storage. Maybe the error message seems clearer compared with "cannot allocate memory". Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <jinkehan@didiglobal.com> Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240910144111.1464912-2-chen.dylane@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Juntong Deng
|
b111ae42bb |
bpf: Make the pointer returned by iter next method valid
[ Upstream commit 4cc8c50c9abcb2646a7a4fcef3cea5dcb30c06cf ] Currently we cannot pass the pointer returned by iter next method as argument to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU kfuncs, because the pointer returned by iter next method is not "valid". This patch sets the pointer returned by iter next method to be valid. This is based on the fact that if the iterator is implemented correctly, then the pointer returned from the iter next method should be valid. This does not make NULL pointer valid. If the iter next method has KF_RET_NULL flag, then the verifier will ask the ebpf program to check NULL pointer. KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterator is a special case, the pointer returned by iter next method should only be valid within RCU critical section, so it should be with MEM_RCU, not PTR_TRUSTED. Another special case is bpf_iter_num_next, which returns a pointer with base type PTR_TO_MEM. PTR_TO_MEM should not be combined with type flag PTR_TRUSTED (PTR_TO_MEM already means the pointer is valid). The pointer returned by iter next method of other types of iterators is with PTR_TRUSTED. In addition, this patch adds get_iter_from_state to help us get the current iterator from the current state. Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB584869F8B448EA1C87B7CDA399962@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Daniel Borkmann
|
a634fa8e48 |
bpf: Zero former ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error
[ Upstream commit 4b3786a6c5397dc220b1483d8e2f4867743e966f ]
For all non-tracing helpers which formerly had ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} as input
arguments, zero the value for the case of an error as otherwise it could leak
memory. For tracing, it is not needed given CAP_PERFMON can already read all
kernel memory anyway hence bpf_get_func_arg() and bpf_get_func_ret() is skipped
in here.
Also, the MTU helpers mtu_len pointer value is being written but also read.
Technically, the MEM_UNINIT should not be there in order to always force init.
Removing MEM_UNINIT needs more verifier rework though: MEM_UNINIT right now
implies two things actually: i) write into memory, ii) memory does not have
to be initialized. If we lift MEM_UNINIT, it then becomes: i) read into memory,
ii) memory must be initialized. This means that for bpf_*_check_mtu() we're
readding the issue we're trying to fix, that is, it would then be able to
write back into things like .rodata BPF maps. Follow-up work will rework the
MEM_UNINIT semantics such that the intent can be better expressed. For now
just clear the *mtu_len on error path which can be lifted later again.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Daniel Borkmann
|
abf7559b4f |
bpf: Improve check_raw_mode_ok test for MEM_UNINIT-tagged types
[ Upstream commit 18752d73c1898fd001569195ba4b0b8c43255f4a ]
When checking malformed helper function signatures, also take other argument
types into account aside from just ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM.
This concerns (formerly) ARG_PTR_TO_{INT,LONG} given uninitialized memory can
be passed there, too.
The func proto sanity check goes back to commit
|
||
|
Daniel Borkmann
|
a2c8dc7e21 |
bpf: Fix helper writes to read-only maps
[ Upstream commit 32556ce93bc45c730829083cb60f95a2728ea48b ]
Lonial found an issue that despite user- and BPF-side frozen BPF map
(like in case of .rodata), it was still possible to write into it from
a BPF program side through specific helpers having ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT}
as arguments.
In check_func_arg() when the argument is as mentioned, the meta->raw_mode
is never set. Later, check_helper_mem_access(), under the case of
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE as register base type, it assumes BPF_READ for the
subsequent call to check_map_access_type() and given the BPF map is
read-only it succeeds.
The helpers really need to be annotated as ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} | MEM_UNINIT
when results are written into them as opposed to read out of them. The
latter indicates that it's okay to pass a pointer to uninitialized memory
as the memory is written to anyway.
However, ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} is a special case of ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM
just with additional alignment requirement. So it is better to just get
rid of the ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} special cases altogether and reuse the
fixed size memory types. For this, add MEM_ALIGNED to additionally ensure
alignment given these helpers write directly into the args via *<ptr> = val.
The .arg*_size has been initialized reflecting the actual sizeof(*<ptr>).
MEM_ALIGNED can only be used in combination with MEM_FIXED_SIZE annotated
argument types, since in !MEM_FIXED_SIZE cases the verifier does not know
the buffer size a priori and therefore cannot blindly write *<ptr> = val.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Daniel Borkmann
|
81197a9b45 |
bpf: Fix bpf_strtol and bpf_strtoul helpers for 32bit
[ Upstream commit cfe69c50b05510b24e26ccb427c7cc70beafd6c1 ]
The bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() helpers are currently broken on 32bit:
The argument type ARG_PTR_TO_LONG is BPF-side "long", not kernel-side "long"
and therefore always considered fixed 64bit no matter if 64 or 32bit underlying
architecture.
This contract breaks in case of the two mentioned helpers since their BPF_CALL
definition for the helpers was added with {unsigned,}long *res. Meaning, the
transition from BPF-side "long" (BPF program) to kernel-side "long" (BPF helper)
breaks here.
Both helpers call __bpf_strtoll() with "long long" correctly, but later assigning
the result into 32-bit "*(long *)" on 32bit architectures. From a BPF program
point of view, this means upper bits will be seen as uninitialised.
Therefore, fix both BPF_CALL signatures to {s,u}64 types to fix this situation.
Now, changing also uapi/bpf.h helper documentation which generates bpf_helper_defs.h
for BPF programs is tricky: Changing signatures there to __{s,u}64 would trigger
compiler warnings (incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to parameter of type
'__s64 *' (aka 'long long *')) for existing BPF programs.
Leaving the signatures as-is would be fine as from BPF program point of view it is
still BPF-side "long" and thus equivalent to __{s,u}64 on 64 or 32bit underlying
architectures.
Note that bpf_strtol() and bpf_strtoul() are the only helpers with this issue.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Eduard Zingerman
|
2288b54b96 |
bpf: correctly handle malformed BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relos
[ Upstream commit 3d2786d65aaa954ebd3fcc033ada433e10da21c4 ]
In case of malformed relocation record of kind BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL
referencing a non-existing BTF type, function bpf_core_calc_relo_insn
would cause a null pointer deference.
Fix this by adding a proper check upper in call stack, as malformed
relocation records could be passed from user space.
Simplest reproducer is a program:
r0 = 0
exit
With a single relocation record:
.insn_off = 0, /* patch first instruction */
.type_id = 100500, /* this type id does not exist */
.access_str_off = 6, /* offset of string "0" */
.kind = BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL,
See the link for original reproducer or next commit for a test case.
Fixes:
|
||
|
Breno Leitao
|
09fba0162b |
bpf: Add sockptr support for setsockopt
[ Upstream commit 3f31e0d14d44ad491a81b7c1f83f32fbc300a867 ]
The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to
something more modern, let's use sockptr in setsockptr BPF hooks, so, it
could be used by other callers.
The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a
kernel value for optlen.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-3-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Breno Leitao
|
4a746fb253 |
bpf: Add sockptr support for getsockopt
[ Upstream commit a615f67e1a426f35366b8398c11f31c148e7df48 ]
The whole network stack uses sockptr, and while it doesn't move to
something more modern, let's use sockptr in getsockptr BPF hooks, so, it
could be used by other callers.
The main motivation for this change is to use it in the io_uring
{g,s}etsockopt(), which will use a userspace pointer for *optval, but, a
kernel value for optlen.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZSArfLaaGcfd8LH8@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016134750.1381153-2-leitao@debian.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Stable-dep-of: 33f339a1ba54 ("bpf, net: Fix a potential race in do_sock_getsockopt()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Leon Hwang
|
3c9e7909df |
bpf, verifier: Correct tail_call_reachable for bpf prog
[ Upstream commit 01793ed86b5d7df1e956520b5474940743eb7ed8 ] It's confusing to inspect 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' with drgn[0], when bpf prog has tail call but 'tail_call_reachable' is false. This patch corrects 'tail_call_reachable' when bpf prog has tail call. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-2-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
|
Yonghong Song
|
7cad3174cc |
bpf: Fix a kernel verifier crash in stacksafe()
commit bed2eb964c70b780fb55925892a74f26cb590b25 upstream.
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext.
Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access
in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code:
if (exact != NOT_EXACT &&
old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])
return false;
The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack.
If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound
access will happen.
To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if
the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise,
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal.
Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks")
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240812214847.213612-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[ shung-hsi.yu: "exact" variable is bool instead enum because commit
4f81c16f50ba ("bpf: Recognize that two registers are safe when their
ranges match") is not present. ]
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
||
|
Alexei Starovoitov
|
63f13eb5d6 |
bpf: Avoid kfree_rcu() under lock in bpf_lpm_trie.
[ Upstream commit 59f2f841179aa6a0899cb9cf53659149a35749b7 ]
syzbot reported the following lock sequence:
cpu 2:
grabs timer_base lock
spins on bpf_lpm lock
cpu 1:
grab rcu krcp lock
spins on timer_base lock
cpu 0:
grab bpf_lpm lock
spins on rcu krcp lock
bpf_lpm lock can be the same.
timer_base lock can also be the same due to timer migration.
but rcu krcp lock is always per-cpu, so it cannot be the same lock.
Hence it's a false positive.
To avoid lockdep complaining move kfree_rcu() after spin_unlock.
Reported-by: syzbot+1fa663a2100308ab6eab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240329171439.37813-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Kees Cook
|
ef33f02968 |
bpf: Replace bpf_lpm_trie_key 0-length array with flexible array
[ Upstream commit 896880ff30866f386ebed14ab81ce1ad3710cfc4 ]
Replace deprecated 0-length array in struct bpf_lpm_trie_key with
flexible array. Found with GCC 13:
../kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:207:51: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'const __u8[0]' {aka 'const unsigned char[]'} [-Warray-bounds=]
207 | *(__be16 *)&key->data[i]);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: in definition of macro '__swab16'
102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
| ^
../include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:97:21: note: in expansion of macro '__be16_to_cpu'
97 | #define be16_to_cpu __be16_to_cpu
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
../kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:206:28: note: in expansion of macro 'be16_to_cpu'
206 | u16 diff = be16_to_cpu(*(__be16 *)&node->data[i]
^
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ../include/linux/bpf.h:7:
../include/uapi/linux/bpf.h:82:17: note: while referencing 'data'
82 | __u8 data[0]; /* Arbitrary size */
| ^~~~
And found at run-time under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:218:49
index 0 is out of range for type '__u8 [*]'
Changing struct bpf_lpm_trie_key is difficult since has been used by
userspace. For example, in Cilium:
struct egress_gw_policy_key {
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key lpm_key;
__u32 saddr;
__u32 daddr;
};
While direct references to the "data" member haven't been found, there
are static initializers what include the final member. For example,
the "{}" here:
struct egress_gw_policy_key in_key = {
.lpm_key = { 32 + 24, {} },
.saddr = CLIENT_IP,
.daddr = EXTERNAL_SVC_IP & 0Xffffff,
};
To avoid the build time and run time warnings seen with a 0-sized
trailing array for struct bpf_lpm_trie_key, introduce a new struct
that correctly uses a flexible array for the trailing bytes,
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8. As part of this, include the "header"
portion (which is just the "prefixlen" member), so it can be used
by anything building a bpf_lpr_trie_key that has trailing members that
aren't a u8 flexible array (like the self-test[1]), which is named
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_hdr.
Unfortunately, C++ refuses to parse the __struct_group() helper, so
it is not possible to define struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_hdr directly in
struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8, so we must open-code the union directly.
Adjust the kernel code to use struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_u8 through-out,
and for the selftest to use struct bpf_lpm_trie_key_hdr. Add a comment
to the UAPI header directing folks to the two new options.
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Closes: https://paste.debian.net/hidden/ca500597/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202206281009.4332AA33@keescook/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240222155612.it.533-kees@kernel.org
Stable-dep-of: 59f2f841179a ("bpf: Avoid kfree_rcu() under lock in bpf_lpm_trie.")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|
Alan Maguire
|
33a1321fb9 |
bpf: Eliminate remaining "make W=1" warnings in kernel/bpf/btf.o
[ Upstream commit 2454075f8e2915cebbe52a1195631bc7efe2b7e1 ]
As reported by Mirsad [1] we still see format warnings in kernel/bpf/btf.o
at W=1 warning level:
CC kernel/bpf/btf.o
./kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function ‘btf_type_seq_show_flags’:
./kernel/bpf/btf.c:7553:21: warning: assignment left-hand side might be a candidate for a format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
7553 | sseq.showfn = btf_seq_show;
| ^
./kernel/bpf/btf.c: In function ‘btf_type_snprintf_show’:
./kernel/bpf/btf.c:7604:31: warning: assignment left-hand side might be a candidate for a format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]
7604 | ssnprintf.show.showfn = btf_snprintf_show;
| ^
Combined with CONFIG_WERROR=y these can halt the build.
The fix (annotating the structure field with __printf())
suggested by Mirsad resolves these. Apologies I missed this last time.
No other W=1 warnings were observed in kernel/bpf after this fix.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/92c9d047-f058-400c-9c7d-81d4dc1ef71b@gmail.com/
Fixes: b3470da314fd ("bpf: annotate BTF show functions with __printf")
Reported-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Mirsad Todorovac <mtodorovac69@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240712092859.1390960-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|