mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 02:21:52 +09:00
312cb0bda6
Problem: On large page size configurations (16KiB, 64KiB), the CMA
alignment requirement (CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES) increases considerably,
and this causes the CMA reservations to be larger than necessary.
This means that system will have less available MIGRATE_UNMOVABLE and
MIGRATE_RECLAIMABLE page blocks since MIGRATE_CMA can't fallback to them.
The CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES increases because it depends on
MAX_PAGE_ORDER which depends on ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. The value of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER increases on 16k and 64k kernels.
For example, in ARM, the CMA alignment requirement when:
- CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER default value is used
- CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is set:
PAGE_SIZE | MAX_PAGE_ORDER | pageblock_order | CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4KiB | 10 | 9 | 4KiB * (2 ^ 9) = 2MiB
16Kib | 11 | 11 | 16KiB * (2 ^ 11) = 32MiB
64KiB | 13 | 13 | 64KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 512MiB
There are some extreme cases for the CMA alignment requirement when:
- CONFIG_ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER maximum value is set
- CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is NOT set:
- CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is NOT set
PAGE_SIZE | MAX_PAGE_ORDER | pageblock_order | CMA_MIN_ALIGNMENT_BYTES
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4KiB | 15 | 15 | 4KiB * (2 ^ 15) = 128MiB
16Kib | 13 | 13 | 16KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 128MiB
64KiB | 13 | 13 | 64KiB * (2 ^ 13) = 512MiB
This affects the CMA reservations for the drivers. If a driver in a
4KiB kernel needs 4MiB of CMA memory, in a 16KiB kernel, the minimal
reservation has to be 32MiB due to the alignment requirements:
reserved-memory {
...
cma_test_reserve: cma_test_reserve {
compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
size = <0x0 0x400000>; /* 4 MiB */
...
};
};
reserved-memory {
...
cma_test_reserve: cma_test_reserve {
compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
size = <0x0 0x2000000>; /* 32 MiB */
...
};
};
Solution: Add a new config CONFIG_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER that
allows to set the page block order in all the architectures.
The maximum page block order will be given by
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
By default, CONFIG_PAGE_BLOCK_ORDER will have the same
value that ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER. This will make sure that
current kernel configurations won't be affected by this
change. It is a opt-in change.
This patch will allow to have the same CMA alignment
requirements for large page sizes (16KiB, 64KiB) as that
in 4kb kernels by setting a lower pageblock_order.
Tests:
- Verified that HugeTLB pages work when pageblock_order is 1, 7, 10
on 4k and 16k kernels.
- Verified that Transparent Huge Pages work when pageblock_order
is 1, 7, 10 on 4k and 16k kernels.
- Verified that dma-buf heaps allocations work when pageblock_order
is 1, 7, 10 on 4k and 16k kernels.
Benchmarks:
The benchmarks compare 16kb kernels with pageblock_order 10 and 7. The
reason for the pageblock_order 7 is because this value makes the min
CMA alignment requirement the same as that in 4kb kernels (2MB).
- Perform 100K dma-buf heaps (/dev/dma_heap/system) allocations of
SZ_8M, SZ_4M, SZ_2M, SZ_1M, SZ_64, SZ_8, SZ_4. Use simpleperf
(https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/simpleperf) to measure
the # of instructions and page-faults on 16k kernels.
The benchmark was executed 10 times. The averages are below:
# instructions | #page-faults
order 10 | order 7 | order 10 | order 7
--------------------------------------------------------
13,891,765,770 | 11,425,777,314 | 220 | 217
14,456,293,487 | 12,660,819,302 | 224 | 219
13,924,261,018 | 13,243,970,736 | 217 | 221
13,910,886,504 | 13,845,519,630 | 217 | 221
14,388,071,190 | 13,498,583,098 | 223 | 224
13,656,442,167 | 12,915,831,681 | 216 | 218
13,300,268,343 | 12,930,484,776 | 222 | 218
13,625,470,223 | 14,234,092,777 | 219 | 218
13,508,964,965 | 13,432,689,094 | 225 | 219
13,368,950,667 | 13,683,587,37 | 219 | 225
-------------------------------------------------------------------
13,803,137,433 | 13,131,974,268 | 220 | 220 Averages
There were 4.85% #instructions when order was 7, in comparison
with order 10.
13,803,137,433 - 13,131,974,268 = -671,163,166 (-4.86%)
The number of page faults in order 7 and 10 were the same.
These results didn't show any significant regression when the
pageblock_order is set to 7 on 16kb kernels.
- Run speedometer 3.1 (https://browserbench.org/Speedometer3.1/) 5 times
on the 16k kernels with pageblock_order 7 and 10.
order 10 | order 7 | order 7 - order 10 | (order 7 - order 10) %
-------------------------------------------------------------------
15.8 | 16.4 | 0.6 | 3.80%
16.4 | 16.2 | -0.2 | -1.22%
16.6 | 16.3 | -0.3 | -1.81%
16.8 | 16.3 | -0.5 | -2.98%
16.6 | 16.8 | 0.2 | 1.20%
-------------------------------------------------------------------
16.44 16.4 -0.04 -0.24% Averages
The results didn't show any significant regression when the
pageblock_order is set to 7 on 16kb kernels.
Signed-off-by: Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit e13e7922d03439e374c263049af5f740ceae6346 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git/ mm-stable)
Bug: 375647879
Bug: 355449177
Bug: 418282543
[jyescas: Use MAX_ORDER instead of MAX_PAGE_ORDER. Update the file
mm/page_alloc.c instead of mm/mm_init.c due the function
set_pageblock_order is there.]
Test: Built and ran kernel
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250521215807.1860663-1-jyescas@google.com
Change-Id: Id7132b6848e5deb97a7531cf546060de2accffac
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
scripts/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with