mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 18:41:58 +09:00
37c227e873
Classic BPF socket filters with SKB_NET_OFF and SKB_LL_OFF fail to
read when these offsets extend into frags.
This has been observed with iwlwifi and reproduced with tun with
IFF_NAPI_FRAGS. The below straightforward socket filter on UDP port,
applied to a RAW socket, will silently miss matching packets.
const int offset_proto = offsetof(struct ip6_hdr, ip6_nxt);
const int offset_dport = sizeof(struct ip6_hdr) + offsetof(struct udphdr, dest);
struct sock_filter filter_code[] = {
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_B + BPF_ABS, SKF_AD_OFF + SKF_AD_PKTTYPE),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, PACKET_HOST, 0, 4),
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_B + BPF_ABS, SKF_NET_OFF + offset_proto),
BPF_JUMP(BPF_JMP + BPF_JEQ + BPF_K, IPPROTO_UDP, 0, 2),
BPF_STMT(BPF_LD + BPF_H + BPF_ABS, SKF_NET_OFF + offset_dport),
This is unexpected behavior. Socket filter programs should be
consistent regardless of environment. Silent misses are
particularly concerning as hard to detect.
Use skb_copy_bits for offsets outside linear, same as done for
non-SKF_(LL|NET) offsets.
Offset is always positive after subtracting the reference threshold
SKB_(LL|NET)_OFF, so is always >= skb_(mac|network)_offset. The sum of
the two is an offset against skb->data, and may be negative, but it
cannot point before skb->head, as skb_(mac|network)_offset would too.
This appears to go back to when frag support was introduced to
sk_run_filter in linux-2.4.4, before the introduction of git.
The amount of code change and 8/16/32 bit duplication are unfortunate.
But any attempt I made to be smarter saved very few LoC while
complicating the code.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250122200402.3461154-1-maze@google.com/
Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/2.4.4/source/net/core/filter.c#L244
Reported-by: Matt Moeller <moeller.matt@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250408132833.195491-2-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit d4bac0288a2b444e468e6df9cb4ed69479ddf14a)
See: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/commit/?id=d4bac0288a2b444e468e6df9cb4ed69479ddf14a
Bug: 384636719
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Change-Id: I44e2572232f3a3459c49626f0fc5089e3e47d451
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
scripts/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with