mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 10:31:46 +09:00
42fcf3b6df
[ Upstream commit29173d07f7] Sk_buffs are fed into sockmap verdict programs either from a strparser (when the user might want to decide how framing of skb is done by attaching another parser program) or directly through tcp_read_sock. The tcp_read_sock is the preferred method for performance when the BPF logic is a stream parser. The flow for Cilium's common use case with a stream parser is, tcp_read_sock() sk_psock_verdict_recv ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() sk_psock_verdict_apply(sock, skb, ret) // if system is under memory pressure or app is slow we may // need to queue skb. Do this queuing through ingress_skb and // then kick timer to wake up handler skb_queue_tail(ingress_skb, skb) schedule_work(work); The work queue is wired up to sk_psock_backlog(). This will then walk the ingress_skb skb list that holds our sk_buffs that could not be handled, but should be OK to run at some later point. However, its possible that the workqueue doing this work still hits an error when sending the skb. When this happens the skbuff is requeued on a temporary 'state' struct kept with the workqueue. This is necessary because its possible to partially send an skbuff before hitting an error and we need to know how and where to restart when the workqueue runs next. Now for the trouble, we don't rekick the workqueue. This can cause a stall where the skbuff we just cached on the state variable might never be sent. This happens when its the last packet in a flow and no further packets come along that would cause the system to kick the workqueue from that side. To fix we could do simple schedule_work(), but while under memory pressure it makes sense to back off some instead of continue to retry repeatedly. So instead to fix convert schedule_work to schedule_delayed_work and add backoff logic to reschedule from backlog queue on errors. Its not obvious though what a good backoff is so use '1'. To test we observed some flakes whil running NGINX compliance test with sockmap we attributed these failed test to this bug and subsequent issue. >From on list discussion. This commit bec217197b41("skmsg: Schedule psock work if the cached skb exists on the psock") was intended to address similar race, but had a couple cases it missed. Most obvious it only accounted for receiving traffic on the local socket so if redirecting into another socket we could still get an sk_buff stuck here. Next it missed the case where copied=0 in the recv() handler and then we wouldn't kick the scheduler. Also its sub-optimal to require userspace to kick the internal mechanisms of sockmap to wake it up and copy data to user. It results in an extra syscall and requires the app to actual handle the EAGAIN correctly. Fixes:04919bed94("tcp: Introduce tcp_read_skb()") Change-Id: I61dbe914b0abf5f0f7e16f95d246c8e4fa0f5afa Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: William Findlay <will@isovalent.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230523025618.113937-3-john.fastabend@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit9f4d7efb33) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@google.com>
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
scripts/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with