Bart Van Assche 5725caa296 FROMLIST: scsi: ufs: Check for completion from the timeout handler
If ufshcd_abort() returns SUCCESS for an already completed command then
that command is completed twice. This results in a crash. Prevent this by
checking whether a command has completed without completion interrupt from
the timeout handler. This CL fixes the following kernel crash:

Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
Call trace:
 dma_direct_map_sg+0x70/0x274
 scsi_dma_map+0x84/0x124
 ufshcd_queuecommand+0x3fc/0x880
 scsi_queue_rq+0x7d0/0x111c
 blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x440/0xebc
 blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x5a4/0x6b8
 __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x150/0x220
 __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xf0/0x218
 __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x8c/0x18c
 blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x1a4/0x360
 blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x130/0x334
 blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x138/0x234
 blk_flush_plug_list+0x118/0x164
 blk_finish_plug()
 read_pages+0x38c/0x408
 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x230/0x2f8
 do_sync_mmap_readahead+0x1a4/0x208
 filemap_fault+0x27c/0x8f4
 f2fs_filemap_fault+0x28/0xfc
 __do_fault+0xc4/0x208
 handle_pte_fault+0x290/0xe04
 do_handle_mm_fault+0x52c/0x858
 do_page_fault+0x5dc/0x798
 do_translation_fault+0x40/0x54
 do_mem_abort+0x60/0x134
 el0_da+0x40/0xb8
 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc4/0xe4
 el0t_64_sync+0x1b4/0x1b8

Bug: 312786487
Bug: 326329246
Bug: 333069246
Bug: 333317508
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20240416171357.1062583-1-bvanassche@acm.org/T/#mbfa6b7a56e07c792ddca7801fb8900f8370d4731
Change-Id: I48e93516d2aae3b2ad62b0b51144e8e2e39d7476
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@google.com>
2024-04-16 11:35:04 -07:00
2021-10-18 20:22:03 -10:00
2023-06-15 09:54:56 +01:00

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass scripts/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
Description
No description provided
Readme 7.9 GiB
Languages
C 97.7%
Assembly 1.6%
Makefile 0.3%
Perl 0.1%