mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-06 19:08:57 +09:00
96beb15eb2
Paul E. McKenney reported [1] that commit1f0723a4c0("mm, slub: enable slub_debug static key when creating cache with explicit debug flags") results in the lockdep complaint: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.12.0+ #15 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ rcu_torture_sta/109 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff96063cd0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: static_key_enable+0x9/0x20 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff96173c28 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x2d/0x250 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0 __mutex_lock+0x8d/0x920 slub_cpu_dead+0x15/0xf0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x17a/0x7c0 cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0x3b/0x80 _cpu_down+0xdf/0x2a0 cpu_down+0x2c/0x50 device_offline+0x82/0xb0 remove_cpu+0x1a/0x30 torture_offline+0x80/0x140 torture_onoff+0x147/0x260 kthread+0x10a/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: check_prev_add+0x8f/0xbf0 __lock_acquire+0x13f0/0x1d80 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0 cpus_read_lock+0x21/0xa0 static_key_enable+0x9/0x20 __kmem_cache_create+0x38d/0x430 kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x146/0x250 kmem_cache_create+0xd/0x10 rcu_torture_stats+0x79/0x280 kthread+0x10a/0x140 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(slab_mutex); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); lock(slab_mutex); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by rcu_torture_sta/109: #0: ffffffff96173c28 (slab_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x2d/0x250 stack backtrace: CPU: 3 PID: 109 Comm: rcu_torture_sta Not tainted 5.12.0+ #15 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x6d/0x89 check_noncircular+0xfe/0x110 ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110 check_prev_add+0x8f/0xbf0 __lock_acquire+0x13f0/0x1d80 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3a0 ? static_key_enable+0x9/0x20 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 cpus_read_lock+0x21/0xa0 ? static_key_enable+0x9/0x20 static_key_enable+0x9/0x20 __kmem_cache_create+0x38d/0x430 kmem_cache_create_usercopy+0x146/0x250 ? rcu_torture_stats_print+0xd0/0xd0 kmem_cache_create+0xd/0x10 rcu_torture_stats+0x79/0x280 ? rcu_torture_stats_print+0xd0/0xd0 kthread+0x10a/0x140 ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 This is because there's one order of locking from the hotplug callbacks: lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); // from hotplug machinery itself lock(slab_mutex); // in e.g. slab_mem_going_offline_callback() And commit1f0723a4c0made the reverse sequence possible: lock(slab_mutex); // in kmem_cache_create_usercopy() lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); // kmem_cache_open() -> static_key_enable() The simplest fix is to move static_key_enable() to a place before slab_mutex is taken. That means kmem_cache_create_usercopy() in mm/slab_common.c which is not ideal for SLUB-specific code, but the #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG makes it at least self-contained and obvious. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210502171827.GA3670492@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210504120019.26791-1-vbabka@suse.cz Fixes:1f0723a4c0("mm, slub: enable slub_debug static key when creating cache with explicit debug flags") Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> (cherry picked from commitafe0c26d19) Bug: 199581299 Signed-off-by: Liujie Xie <xieliujie@oppo.com> Change-Id: I72fd0d24e4ca0ee9bd261547133fb6046c8b5f6a
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
script/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with