mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-05 02:21:52 +09:00
d4d02ab9b0
commit5f89468e2fupstream. in case of driver wants to sync part of ranges with offset, swiotlb_tbl_sync_single() copies from orig_addr base to tlb_addr with offset and ends up with data mismatch. It was removed from "swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single", but said logic has to be added back in. From Linus's email: "That commit which the removed the offset calculation entirely, because the old (unsigned long)tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1) was wrong, but instead of removing it, I think it should have just fixed it to be (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1); instead. That way the slot offset always matches the slot index calculation." (Unfortunatly that broke NVMe). The use-case that drivers are hitting is as follow: 1. Get dma_addr_t from dma_map_single() dma_addr_t tlb_addr = dma_map_single(dev, vaddr, vsize, DMA_TO_DEVICE); |<---------------vsize------------->| +-----------------------------------+ | | original buffer +-----------------------------------+ vaddr swiotlb_align_offset |<----->|<---------------vsize------------->| +-------+-----------------------------------+ | | | swiotlb buffer +-------+-----------------------------------+ tlb_addr 2. Do something 3. Sync dma_addr_t through dma_sync_single_for_device(..) dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, tlb_addr + offset, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); Error case. Copy data to original buffer but it is from base addr (instead of base addr + offset) in original buffer: swiotlb_align_offset |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->| +-------+-----------------------------------+ | | |##########| | swiotlb buffer +-------+-----------------------------------+ tlb_addr |<- size ->| +-----------------------------------+ |##########| | original buffer +-----------------------------------+ vaddr The fix is to copy the data to the original buffer and take into account the offset, like so: swiotlb_align_offset |<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->| +-------+-----------------------------------+ | | |##########| | swiotlb buffer +-------+-----------------------------------+ tlb_addr |<- offset ->|<- size ->| +-----------------------------------+ | |##########| | original buffer +-----------------------------------+ vaddr [One fix which was Linus's that made more sense to as it created a symmetry would break NVMe. The reason for that is the: unsigned int offset = (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1); would come up with the proper offset, but it would lose the alignment (which this patch contains).] Bug: 192521392 Fixes:16fc3cef33("swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single") Signed-off-by: Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reported-by: Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com> Reported-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com> Tested-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commite6108147ddof linux-5.10.47) Change-Id: Ib03e81080ab029d37e6ff54a3e2cb526d3a30e10
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
script/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with