VOP output mode and bus_format must be ROCKCHIP_OUT_MODE_YUV420
and MEDIA_BUS_FMT_YUV8_1X24 when display mode has a YCbCr420
flag.
Change-Id: Ib2d51c119f5a8f1b8a9285c47ab228b22a293d56
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yang <zhengyang@rock-chips.com>
Since bits[19:22] have been used for picture aspect ratio
in upstream patch 876f43c073.
We define YCbCr420 flag to the subsequent bits.
Change-Id: I2eff8b51227fc7beb4f587e90bc070ae865ba9d4
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yang <zhengyang@rock-chips.com>
invert the pwm polarity for new pwm interface
Change-Id: I8dfde14fbc4fd4aa907722f260ce72fdb4d7d3bb
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
The pwm_apply_args() should be removed when switching to the atomic
PWM API. Oherwise, the screen would splashing as the backlight is
disabled once when boot.
Change-Id: I0cadd471db54140192c39b9d7c6a673862e8f8d8
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
If the pwm was not enabled at uboot loader, pwm could not work for clock
always disabled at pwm driver. The pwm clock is enabled at beginning of
pwm_apply(), but disabled at end of pwm_apply().
If the pwm was enabled at uboot loader, pwm clock is always enabled unless
closed by ATF. The pwm-backlight might turn off the power at early suspend,
should disable pwm clock for saving power consume.
It is important to provide opportunity to enable/disable clock at pwm driver,
the pwm consumer should ensure correct order to call pwm enable/disable, and
pwm driver ensure state of pwm clock synchronized with pwm enabled state.
Change-Id: I545db81eb638957567abacb93fd06fff9dd7181b
Fixes: 2bf1c98aa5 ("pwm: rockchip: Add support for atomic update")
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
While the particular usage in question is likely safe (struct
cros_ec_command is 32-bit aligned, followed by <= 32-bit fields), it's
been suggested this is not a great pattern to follow for the general
case -- for example, if we follow a 'struct cros_ec_command' (which is
32-bit- but not 64-bit-aligned) with a struct that starts with a 64-bit
type (e.g., u64), the compiler may add padding.
Let's add __packed, to inform the compiler of our true intention -- to
have no padding between these struct elements -- and to future proof for
any refactorings that might occur.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 065cfbbb63)
Change-Id: Iddd499863dde168679a88c2f9ecc461316b417a0
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Use the new ChromeOS EC EC_CMD_PWM_{GET,SET}_DUTY commands to control
one or more PWMs attached to the Embedded Controller. Because the EC
allows us to modify the duty cycle (as a percentage, where U16_MAX is
100%) but not the period, we assign the period a fixed value of
EC_PWM_MAX_DUTY and reject all attempts to change it.
This driver supports only device tree at the moment, because that
provides a very flexible way of describing the relationship between PWMs
and their consumer devices (e.g., backlight). On a non-DT system, we'll
probably want to use the non-GENERIC addressing (i.e., we'll need to
make special device instances that will use EC_PWM_TYPE_KB_LIGHT or
EC_PWM_TYPE_DISPLAY_LIGHT), as well as the relatively inflexible
pwm_lookup infrastructure for matching devices. Defer that work for now.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1f0d3bb027)
Change-Id: I47dbb20b10ae1b941e50e9a783cb708dff8f7efd
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The ChromeOS Embedded Controller can support controlling its attached
PWMs via its host-command interface. The number of supported PWMs varies
on a per-board basis, but we can autodetect this by checking the error
codes, so we don't need an extra property for this. And because the EC
only allows specifying the duty cycle and not the period, we don't
specify the period via pwm-cells, and instead have only support for one
cell -- to specify the index.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9e60f50b4a)
Change-Id: Ibb2ac5cff1e8cc2ab43c9f1f89e68e48da23d897
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The continuous mode allows one to declare a PWM regulator without having
to declare the voltage <-> dutycycle association table. It works fine as
long as your voltage(dutycycle) function is linear, but also has the
following constraints:
- dutycycle for min_uV = 0%
- dutycycle for max_uV = 100%
- dutycycle for min_uV < dutycycle for max_uV
While the linearity constraint is acceptable for now, we sometimes need to
restrict of the PWM range (to limit the maximum/minimum voltage for
example) or have a min_uV_dutycycle > max_uV_dutycycle (this could be
tweaked with PWM polarity, but not all PWMs support inverted polarity).
Add the pwm-dutycycle-range and pwm-dutycycle-unit DT properties to define
such constraints. If those properties are not defined, the PWM regulator
use the default pwm-dutycycle-range = <0 100> and
pwm-dutycycle-unit = <100> values (existing behavior).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ea398e2873)
Change-Id: I6e10c93a6620113e1463221d461fc23ccf3fe398
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The current logic will disable the PWM clk even if the PWM was left
enabled by the bootloader (because it's controlling a critical device
like a regulator for example).
Keep the PWM clk enabled if the PWM is enabled to avoid any glitches.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(commit 48cf973cae)
Conflicts:
drivers/pwm/pwm-rockchip.c
Change-Id: I75ffccd19c5244568fc0034d1585dac490296111
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The current implementation always round down the duty and period values,
while it would be better to round them to the closest integer.
These changes are needed in preparation of atomic update support to
prevent a period/duty cycle drift when executing several times the
'pwm_get_state() / modify / pwm_apply_state()' sequence.
Say you have an expected period of 3.333 us and a clk rate of
112.666667 MHz -- the clock frequency doesn't divide evenly, so the
period (stashed in nanoseconds) shrinks when we convert to the register
value and back, as follows:
pwm_apply_state(): register = period * 112666667 / 1000000000;
pwm_get_state(): period = register * 1000000000 / 112666667;
or in other words:
period = period * 112666667 / 1000000000 * 1000000000 / 112666667;
which yields a sequence like:
3333 -> 3328
3328 -> 3319
3319 -> 3310
3310 -> 3301
3301 -> 3292
3292 -> ... (etc) ...
With this patch, we'd see instead:
period = div_round_closest(period * 112666667, 1000000000) *
1000000000 / 112666667;
which yields a stable sequence:
3333 -> 3337
3337 -> 3337
3337 -> ... (etc) ...
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 12f9ce4a51)
Change-Id: Ife75404e663d1380725d634ac621b2ca9f831791
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The continuous PWM voltage regulator is caching the voltage value in
the ->volt_uV field. While most of the time this value should reflect the
real voltage, sometime it can be sightly different if the PWM device
rounded the set_duty_cycle request.
Moreover, this value is not valid until someone has modified the regulator
output.
Remove the ->volt_uV field and always rely on the PWM state to calculate
the regulator output.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit d9070fdbe4)
Change-Id: Iba7b143c1b08d547b5cd46ac42d9051fb34309df
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The ->state field is currently initialized to 0, thus referencing the
voltage selector at index 0, which might not reflect the current
voltage value.
If possible, retrieve the current voltage selector from the PWM state,
else return -EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 87248991a1)
Change-Id: I179395dc7bad7aa867e68c92be7ce92b03ae7112
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Use the atomic API wherever appropriate and get rid of pwm_apply_args()
call (the reference period and polarity are now explicitly set when
calling pwm_apply_state()).
We also make use of the pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle() helper to ease
relative to absolute duty_cycle conversion.
Note that changes introduced by commit fd786fb027 ("regulator: pwm:
Try to avoid voltage error in duty cycle calculation") are no longer
needed because pwm_set_relative_duty_cycle() takes care of all rounding
approximation for us.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3f4eb39be9)
Change-Id: Id12d4d625fb6e1e5ff3725737cc9232e4df40c36
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The PWM framework expects PWM users to configure the duty cycle in nano-
seconds, but many users want to express the duty cycle relatively to the
period value (i.e. duty_cycle = 33% of the period).
Add the pwm_{get,set}_relative_duty_cycle() helpers to ease this kind of
conversion.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit f6f3bddf7b)
Change-Id: Ifffc72290225766a6006db6b18e6902ee51adb1c
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The pwm_init_state() helper prepares a new state object containing the
current PWM state except for the polarity and period fields which are
set to the reference values (those in struct pwm_args).
This is particularly useful for PWM users who want to apply a new duty-
cycle expressed relatively to the reference period without changing the
enable state.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a6a0dbbcfa)
Change-Id: Ib968e8fa6a49d5f853fc13cb4935e2af7494040f
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The original commit adding support for continuous voltage mode didn't
handle the regulator ramp delay properly. It treated the delay as a
fixed delay in uS despite the property being defined as uV / uS. Let's
adjust it. Luckily there appear to be no users of this ramp delay for
PWM regulators (as per grepping through device trees in linuxnext).
Note also that the upper bound of usleep_range probably shouldn't be a
full 1 ms longer than the lower bound since I've seen plenty of hardware
with a ramp rate of ~5000 uS / uV and for small jumps the total delays
are in the tens of uS. 1000 is way too much. We'll try to be dynamic
and use 10%.
NOTE: This commit doesn't add support for regulator-enable-ramp-delay.
That could be done in a future patch when someone has a user of that
featre.
Though this patch is shows as "fixing" a bug, there are no actual known
users of continuous mode PWM regulator w/ ramp delay in mainline and so
this likely won't have any effect on anyone unless they are working
out-of-tree with private patches. For anyone in this state, it is
highly encouraged to also pick Boris Brezillon's WIP patches to get
yourself a reliable and glitch-free regulator.
Fixes: 4773be185a ("regulator: pwm-regulator: Add support for continuous-voltage")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit c2588393e6)
Change-Id: Ib0af8e04275813f333af12d48567b7e411b4d49f
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Commit 5ec803edcb ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic
updates"), implemented pwm_disable() as a wrapper around
pwm_apply_state(), and then, commit ef2bf4997f ("pwm: Improve args
checking in pwm_apply_state()") added missing checks on the ->period
value in pwm_apply_state() to ensure we were not passing inappropriate
values to the ->config() or ->apply() methods.
The conjunction of these 2 commits led to a case where pwm_disable()
was no longer succeeding, thus preventing the polarity setting done
in pwm_apply_args().
Set a valid period in pwm_apply_args() to ensure polarity setting
won't be rejected.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Suggested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Fixes: 5ec803edcb ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates")
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 33cdcee04b)
Change-Id: I9f28ae411953208b31c8d17214fce21e5177cee1
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Add an optional enable GPIO to the pwm-regulator driver.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 27bfa8893b)
Change-Id: I6530165e6bccb4fc82d2916d169a02ecdcbfcd3e
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Allow a user to read PWM capture results from sysfs. To start a capture
and read the result, simply read the file:
$ cat $PWMCHIP/capture
The output format is "<period> <duty cycle>".
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1a366fe915)
Change-Id: I86326709c373630a9189232a1cf2804a1a6ed380
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Supply a PWM capture callback op in order to pass back information
obtained by running analysis on a PWM signal. This would normally (at
least during testing) be called from the sysfs routines with a view to
printing out PWM capture data which has been encoded into a string.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: make capture data unsigned int for symmetry]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3a3d1a4e32)
Change-Id: Iee3acf2eb02c5282d586f4e7f1745031e17cc383
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
This patch adds to check the return value from pwm_apply_state()
used in enable_store(). The error of enable_store() doesn't work
if the return value doesn't received.
Signed-off-by: Ryo Kodama <ryo.kodama.vz@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Fixes: 39100ceea7 ("pwm: Switch to the atomic API")
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit fe5aa34d6e)
Change-Id: I550da28345bcee7a6aa8e1f9b5c43adae923ff2d
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
It seems like in the process of refactoring pwm_config() to utilize the
newly-introduced pwm_apply_state() API, some args/bounds checking was
dropped.
In particular, I noted that we are now allowing invalid period
selections, e.g.:
# echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/export
# cat /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm1/period
100
# echo 101 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm1/duty_cycle
[... driver may or may not reject the value, or trigger some logic bug ...]
It's better to see:
# echo 1 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/export
# cat /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm1/period
100
# echo 101 > /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0/pwm1/duty_cycle
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
This patch reintroduces some bounds checks in both pwm_config() (for its
signed parameters; we don't want to convert negative values into large
unsigned values) and in pwm_apply_state() (which fix the above described
behavior, as well as other potential API misuses).
Fixes: 5ec803edcb ("pwm: Add core infrastructure to allow atomic updates")
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit ef2bf4997f)
Change-Id: I7d7515a51b5c3c2a77ae9743b7ed69eedc11d4b4
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Now that the PWM regulator driver implements the ->enable/disable() hooks
we can remove the pwm_enable() call from pwm_regulator_set_voltage().
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 830583004e)
Change-Id: I89fba9a44d98ed94ede099b841b7358ba4011e35
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The PWM states make it possible to also output the polarity, duty cycle
and period information in the debugfs summary output. This simplifies
gathering information about PWMs without needing to walk through the
sysfs attributes of every PWM.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: use more spaces in debugfs output]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 23e3523f5d)
Change-Id: Ia5d4d9ab898510d07364ad455ccf93e1c1d95d2b
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Add an ->apply() method to the pwm_ops struct to allow PWM drivers to
implement atomic updates. This method is preferred over the ->enable(),
->disable() and ->config() methods if available.
Add the pwm_apply_state() function to the PWM user API.
Note that the pwm_apply_state() does not guarantee the atomicity of the
update operation, it all depends on the availability and implementation
of the ->apply() method.
pwm_enable/disable/set_polarity/config() are now implemented as wrappers
around the pwm_apply_state() function.
pwm_adjust_config() is allowing smooth handover between the bootloader
and the kernel. This function tries to adapt the current PWM state to
the PWM arguments coming from a PWM lookup table or a DT definition
without changing the duty_cycle/period proportion.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
[thierry.reding@gmail.com: fix a couple of typos]
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5ec803edcb)
Change-Id: Ib527f34ca3ce90ded3b48725d7ab9509de2053c9
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Add a ->get_state() function to the pwm_ops struct to let PWM drivers
initialize the PWM state attached to a PWM device.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 15fa8a43c1)
Change-Id: Ie37be2d34833cbb6cc4b4b4cb6af98ac721b953a
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Prepare the transition to PWM atomic update by moving the enabled and
disabled state into the pwm_state struct. This way we can easily update
the whole PWM state by copying the new state in the ->state field.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 09a7e4a3d9)
Change-Id: I38808d868c7e73f0ffd49cfb6c0b4b45fa911613
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The PWM state, represented by its period, duty_cycle and polarity is
currently directly stored in the PWM device. Declare a pwm_state
structure embedding those field so that we can later use this struct
to atomically update all the PWM parameters at once.
All pwm_get_xxx() helpers are now implemented as wrappers around
pwm_get_state().
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 43a276b003)
Change-Id: I44037440bcc9d9164d18f3bfa1c8ff3e593925c5
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
Before the introduction of pwm_args, the core was resetting the PWM
period and polarity states to the reference values (those provided
through the DT, a PWM lookup table or hardcoded in the driver).
Now that all PWM users are correctly using pwm_args to configure their
PWM device, we can safely remove the pwm_apply_args() call in pwm_get()
and of_pwm_get().
We can also get rid of the pwm_set_period() call in pwm_apply_args(),
because PWM users are now directly using pargs->period instead of
pwm_get_period(). By doing that we avoid messing with the current PWM
period.
The only remaining bit in pwm_apply_args() is the initial polarity
setting, and it should go away when all PWM users have been patched to
use the atomic API (with this API the polarity will be set along with
other PWM arguments when configuring the PWM).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit a8c3862551)
Change-Id: I5112f2d8a7b66e01184984376dcae84decf5ad28
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config (the
platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM lookup table)
and real PWM state.
Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.
This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has just
been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6cb9644db7)
Change-Id: Idc29a17716d439962b50db156c13b65abd852d90
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The PWM framework has clarified the concept of reference PWM config (the
platform dependent config retrieved from the DT or the PWM lookup table)
and real PWM state.
Use pwm_get_args() when the PWM user wants to retrieve this reference
config and not the current state.
This is part of the rework allowing the PWM framework to support
hardware readout and expose real PWM state even when the PWM has just
been requested (before the user calls pwm_config/enable/disable()).
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from 8c12ad8e91)
Conflicts:
drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c
Change-Id: Id7fb1d823db7a0be207de4f0393e6c86df143335
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
PWM devices are not protected against concurrent accesses. The lock in
struct pwm_device might let PWM users think it is, but it's actually
only protecting the enabled state.
Removing this lock should be fine as long as all PWM users are aware
that accesses to the PWM device have to be serialized, which seems to be
the case for all of them except the sysfs interface. Patch the sysfs
code by adding a lock to the pwm_export struct and making sure it's
taken for all relevant accesses to the exported PWM device.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 459a25afe9)
Change-Id: I30d97ebaf1db8b80c353da5ebebd0fc5d5c57bb0
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
The PWM period will be set when calling pwm_config. Remove this useless
call to pwm_set_period(), which might mess up the internal PWM state.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7f044b09b6)
Change-Id: I6eecc6cd8e9dbe5929bdc016433772a721711928
Signed-off-by: David Wu <david.wu@rock-chips.com>
