In __cmd_top(), perf_set_multithreaded() is used to enable
pthread_rwlock, thus down_read() and down_write () are not nops,
handling concurrency problems
Then 'perf top' uses perf_set_singlethreaded(), switching to the single
threaded phase, assuming that no thread concurrency will happen later.
However, a use after free problem could occur in the single threaded
phase, the concurrent procedure is this:
display_thread process_thread
-------------- --------------
thread__comm_len
-> thread__comm_str
-> __thread__comm_str(thread)
thread__delete
-> comm__free
-> comm_str__put
-> zfree(&cs->str)
-> thread->comm_len = strlen(comm);
Since in single thread phase, perf_singlethreaded is true, down_read()
and down_write() do nothing to avoid concurrency problems.
This patch moves the perf_set_singlethreaded() call to the function tail
to expand the multithreaded phase range, making display_thread() and
process_thread() concurrency safe.
Reviewed-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Hangliang Lai <laihangliang1@huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Wenyu Liu <liuwenyu7@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Feilong Lin <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Cc: Hewenliang <hewenliang4@huawei.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411013224.2079-1-laihangliang1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This reverts commit de34007751.
There are too many build errors, which needs to be sorted out first.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
An audit showed just this one problem with zfree(), fix it.
Fixes: 9fbc61f832 ("perf pmu: Add support for PMU capabilities")
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The Qcom PCIe controller is capable of using either internal MSI controller
or the external GIC-ITS for signaling MSIs sent by endpoint devices.
Currently, the binding only documents the internal MSI implementation.
Let's document the GIC-ITS imeplementation by making use of msi-map and
msi-map-mask properties. Only one of the implementation should be used
at a time and the drivers can choose the preferred one.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230411121442.22227-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
SM8550 requires two additional clocks for proper working.
Add these two clocks as optional clocks (as only required by this
platform) and compatible for this platform.
While at it, let's also rename the reset variable to "rst" from
"pci_reset" to match the existing naming preference.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320144658.1794991-2-abel.vesa@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
[lpieralisi@kernel.org: commit log rewording]
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
This file already used zfree() in other places, so this just plugs some
leftovers.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
EXPORT macro already have labels defined by itself.
Remove duplicated labels outside to silent assembler warnings.
Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
set_swbp() in arch/mips/kernel/uprobes.c is same with the weak version
in kernel/events/uprobes.c, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Like all the other archs, use def_bool y for ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES,
then no need to select ARCH_SUPPORTS_UPROBES.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also include the missing linux/zalloc.h header directive.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also remove one NULL test before free(), as it accepts a NULL arg and we
get one line shaved not doing it explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also remove one NULL test before free(), as it accepts a NULL arg and we
get one line shaved not doing it explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Also remove one NULL test before free(), as it accepts a NULL arg and we
get one line shaved not doing it explicitely.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
For SDIO host controllers with DMA support the TX buffer physical memory
address need to be aligned at an 8-byte boundary. Reserve 8 bytes of
extra TX headroom so we can align the data without re-allocating the
transmit buffer.
While here, also remove the TODO comment regarding extra headroom for
USB and SDIO. For SDIO the extra headroom is now handled and for USB it
was not needed so far.
Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405200729.632435-6-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
Add a sub-driver for SDIO based chipsets which implements the following
functionality:
- register accessors for 8, 16 and 32 bits for all states of the card
(including usage of 4x 8 bit access for one 32 bit buffer if the card
is not fully powered on yet - or if it's fully powered on then 1x 32
bit access is used)
- checking whether there's space in the TX FIFO queue to transmit data
- transfers from the host to the device for actual network traffic,
reserved pages (for firmware download) and H2C (host-to-card)
transfers
- receiving data from the device
- deep power saving state
The transmit path is optimized so DMA-capable SDIO host controllers can
directly use the buffers provided because the buffer's physical
addresses are 8 byte aligned.
The receive path is prepared to support RX aggregation where the
chipset combines multiple MAC frames into one bigger buffer to reduce
SDIO transfer overhead.
Co-developed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405200729.632435-3-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
The SDIO HCI implementation needs to know when the MAC is powered on.
This is needed because 32-bit register access has to be split into 4x
8-bit register access when the MAC is not fully powered on or while
powering off. When the MAC is powered on 32-bit register access can be
used to reduce the number of transfers but splitting into 4x 8-bit
register access still works in that case.
During the power on sequence is how RTW_FLAG_POWERON is only set when
the power on sequence has completed successfully. During power off
however RTW_FLAG_POWERON is set. This means that the upcoming SDIO HCI
implementation does not know that it has to use 4x 8-bit register
accessors. Clear the RTW_FLAG_POWERON flag early when powering off the
MAC so the whole power off sequence is processed with RTW_FLAG_POWERON
unset. This will make it possible to use the RTW_FLAG_POWERON flag in
the upcoming SDIO HCI implementation.
Note that a failure in rtw_pwr_seq_parser() while applying
chip->pwr_off_seq can theoretically result in the RTW_FLAG_POWERON
flag being cleared while the chip is still powered on. However,
depending on when the failure occurs in the power off sequence the
chip may be on or off. Even the original approach of clearing
RTW_FLAG_POWERON only when the power off sequence has been applied
successfully could end up in some corner case where the chip is
powered off but RTW_FLAG_POWERON was not cleared.
Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405200729.632435-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com
commit f003277311 ("KVM: arm64: Use config_lock to protect vgic
state") was meant to rectify a longstanding lock ordering issue in KVM
where the kvm->lock is taken while holding vcpu->mutex. As it so
happens, the aforementioned commit introduced yet another locking issue
by acquiring the its_lock before acquiring the config lock.
This is obviously wrong, especially considering that the lock ordering
is well documented in vgic.c. Reshuffle the locks once more to take the
config_lock before the its_lock. While at it, sprinkle in the lockdep
hinting that has become popular as of late to keep lockdep apprised of
our ordering.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f003277311 ("KVM: arm64: Use config_lock to protect vgic state")
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230412062733.988229-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev
Do defensive programming by using zfree() to initialize freed pointers
to NULL, so that eventual use after free result in a NULL pointer deref
instead of more subtle behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
