I just landed the fence deadline PR from Rob that a bunch of drivers
want/need to apply driver-specific patches. Backmerge -rc4 so that
they don't have to be stuck on -rc2 for no reason at all.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This series adds a deadline hint to fences, so realtime deadlines
such as vblank can be communicated to the fence signaller for power/
frequency management decisions.
This is partially inspired by a trick i915 does, but implemented
via dma-fence for a couple of reasons:
1) To continue to be able to use the atomic helpers
2) To support cases where display and gpu are different drivers
See https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93035/
This does not yet add any UAPI, although this will be needed in
a number of cases:
1) Workloads "ping-ponging" between CPU and GPU, where we don't
want the GPU freq governor to interpret time stalled waiting
for GPU as "idle" time
2) Cases where the compositor is waiting for fences to be signaled
before issuing the atomic ioctl, for example to maintain 60fps
cursor updates even when the GPU is not able to maintain that
framerate.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/CAF6AEGt5nDQpa6J86V1oFKPA30YcJzPhAVpmF7N1K1g2N3c=Zg@mail.gmail.com
This series adds a deadline hint to fences, so realtime deadlines
such as vblank can be communicated to the fence signaller for power/
frequency management decisions.
This is partially inspired by a trick i915 does, but implemented
via dma-fence for a couple of reasons:
1) To continue to be able to use the atomic helpers
2) To support cases where display and gpu are different drivers
See https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/93035/
This does not yet add any UAPI, although this will be needed in
a number of cases:
1) Workloads "ping-ponging" between CPU and GPU, where we don't
want the GPU freq governor to interpret time stalled waiting
for GPU as "idle" time
2) Cases where the compositor is waiting for fences to be signaled
before issuing the atomic ioctl, for example to maintain 60fps
cursor updates even when the GPU is not able to maintain that
framerate.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
For an atomic commit updating a single CRTC (ie. a pageflip) calculate
the next vblank time, and inform the fence(s) of that deadline.
v2: Comment typo fix (danvet)
v3: If there are multiple CRTCs, consider the time of the soonest vblank
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Will be used in the next commit to set a deadline on fences that an
atomic update is waiting on.
v2: Calculate time at *start* of vblank period, not end
v3: Fix kbuild complaints
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>
As the finished fence is the one that is exposed to userspace, and
therefore the one that other operations, like atomic update, would
block on, we need to propagate the deadline from from the finished
fence to the actual hw fence.
v2: Split into drm_sched_fence_set_parent() (ckoenig)
v3: Ensure a thread calling drm_sched_fence_set_deadline_finished() sees
fence->parent set before drm_sched_fence_set_parent() does this
test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT).
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com>
We had all of the internal driver APIs, but not the all important
userspace uABI, in the dma-buf doc. Fix that. And re-arrange the
comments slightly as otherwise the comments for the ioctl nr defines
would not show up.
v2: Fix docs build warning coming from newly including the uabi header
in the docs build
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Pekka Paalanen <pekka.paalanen@collabora.com>
Add a way to set a deadline on remaining resv fences according to the
requested usage.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Propagate the deadline to all the fences in the chain.
v2: Use dma_fence_chain_contained [Tvrtko]
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
The WA states that we need to alert the GSC FW before doing a GSC engine
reset and then wait for 200ms. The GuC owns engine reset, so on the i915
side we only need to apply this for full GT reset.
Given that we do full GT resets in the resume paths to cleanup the HW
state and that a long wait in those scenarios would not be acceptable,
a faster path has been introduced where, if the GSC is idle, we try first
to individually reset the GuC and all engines except the GSC and only fall
back to full reset if that fails.
Note: according to the WA specs, if the GSC is idle it should be possible
to only wait for the uC wakeup time (~15ms) instead of the whole 200ms.
However, the GSC FW team have mentioned that the wakeup time can change
based on other things going on in the HW and pcode, so a good security
margin would be required. Given that when the GSC is idle we already
skip the wait & reset entirely and that this reduced wait would still
likely be too long to use in resume paths, it's not worth adding support
for this reduced wait.
v2: add comment to explain why it is safe to skip the GSC reset (John)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230323231857.2194435-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Commit 3db9d59055 ("drm/i915/gt: Reset twice") modified the code to
always hit the GDRST register twice when doing a reset, with the
reported aim to fix invalid post-reset engine state on some platforms
(Jasperlake being the only one actually mentioned).
This is a problem on MTL, due to the fact that we have to apply a time
consuming WA (coming in the next patch) every time we hit the GDRST
register in a way that can include the GSC engine. Even post MTL, the
expectation is that we'll have some work to do before and after hitting
the GDRST if the GSC is involved.
Since the issue requiring the double reset seems to be limited to older
platforms, instead of trying to handle the double-reset on MTL and
future platforms it is just easier to turn it off. The default on MTL is
also for GuC to own engine reset, with i915 only covering full-GT reset.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230323231857.2194435-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
A patch series for moving MIPI-DSI driver for Exynos DRM to drm/bridge
directory so that I.MX SoC family can also share the same device driver.
Samsung MIPI DSIM device is a common IP that can be used by Exynos and I.MX8M
Mini/Nano/Plus SoC. Regarding this, this patch series has added several
things below to existing MIPI DSI driver,
- Add exynos_dsi_type enum type to provide controller data from different
platforms.
- Add two pipeline detection ways support - existing Exynos DSI child node
and I.MX family of-graph port or ports.
- Consider component and bridged based DRM drivers.
- Add device tree binding support of I.MX family.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230328040524.49278-1-inki.dae@samsung.com
Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used in various
SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano.
In order to access this DSI controller between various platform SoCs,
the ideal way to incorporate this in the drm stack is via the drm bridge
driver.
We already have a consolidated code for supporting component and bridge
based DRM drivers, so keep the exynos component based code in existing
exynos_drm_dsi.c and move generic bridge code as part of samsung-dsim.c
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
IRQ handler for te-gpio seems to be common across DSIM host.
However, Exynos is handling this via CRTC drivers but there is no clear
evidence on how the same has been handled in i.MX8MM. Keeping the handler
as-it-is can be a viable option but adding DSIM bridge core in upcoming
patches is not possible to call Exynos CRTC handler as DSIM bridge has
to be common across DRM bridge core instead of platform specific DRM
drivers like Exynos here.
So, this patch handles the handler via platform host helper, so-that
handling platform specific hook across Exynos and generic can be
reasonable till it makes it generic across all platforms.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
DSI host registration, attach and detach operations are quite
different for the component and bridge-based DRM drivers.
Supporting generic bridge driver to use both component and bridge
based DRM drivers can be tricky and would require additional host
related operation hooks.
Add host operation hooks for registering and unregistering Exynos
and generic drivers, where Exynos hooks are used in existing Exynos
component based DRM drivers and generic hooks are used in i.MX8M
bridge based DRM drivers.
Add host attach and detach operation hooks for Exynos component
DRM drivers and those get invoked while DSI core host attach and
detach gets called.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Finding the right input bus format throughout the pipeline is hard
so add atomic_get_input_bus_fmts callback and initialize with the
proper input format from list of supported output formats.
This format can be used in pipeline for negotiating bus format between
the DSI-end of this bridge and the other component closer to pipeline
components.
List of Pixel formats are taken from,
AN13573 i.MX 8/RT MIPI DSI/CSI-2, Rev. 0, 21 March 2022
3.7.4 Pixel formats
Table 14. DSI pixel packing formats
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
LCDIF-DSIM glue logic inverts the HS/VS/DE signals and expecting
the i.MX8M Mini/Nano DSI host to add additional Data Enable signal
active low (DE_LOW). This makes the valid data transfer on each
horizontal line.
So, add additional bus flags DE_LOW setting via input_bus_flags
for i.MX8M Mini/Nano platforms.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Suggested-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Look like an explicit fixing up of mode_flags is required for DSIM IP
present in i.MX8M Mini/Nano SoCs.
At least the LCDIF + DSIM needs active low sync polarities in order
to correlate the correct sync flags of the surrounding components in
the chain to make sure the whole pipeline can work properly.
On the other hand the i.MX 8M Mini Applications Processor Reference Manual,
Rev. 3, 11/2020 says.
"13.6.3.5.2 RGB interface
Vsync, Hsync, and VDEN are active high signals."
i.MX 8M Mini Applications Processor Reference Manual Rev. 3, 11/2020
3.6.3.5.2 RGB interface
i.MX 8M Nano Applications Processor Reference Manual Rev. 2, 07/2022
13.6.2.7.2 RGB interface
both claim "Vsync, Hsync, and VDEN are active high signals.", the
LCDIF must generate inverted HS/VS/DE signals, i.e. active LOW.
No clear evidence about whether it can be documentation issues or
something, so added proper comments on the code.
Comments are suggested by Marek Vasut.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Host transfer() in the DSI master will invoke only when the DSI commands
are sent from DSI devices like DSI Panel or DSI bridges and this host
the transfer wouldn't invoke for I2C-based-DSI bridge drivers.
Handling DSI host initialization in transfer calls misses the controller
setup for I2C configured DSI bridges.
This patch updates the DSI host initialization by calling host to init
from bridge pre_enable as the bridge pre_enable API is invoked by core
as it is common across all classes of DSI device drivers.
The host init during pre_enable is conditional and not invoked for Exynos
as existing downstream drm panels and bridges in Exynos are expecting
the host initialization during DSI transfer.
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Samsung MIPI DSIM controller is common DSI IP that can be used
in various SoCs like Exynos, i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus.
Add hw_type enum via platform_data so that accessing the different
controller data between various platforms becomes easy and meaningful.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Suggested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
The same Samsung MIPI DSIM master can also be used in NXP's
i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus SoC.
In i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus SoC the DSI Phy requires a MIPI DPHY
bit to reset in order to activate the PHY and that can be done
via upstream i.MX8M blk-ctrl driver.
So, mark the phy get as optional.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
In general, for MIPI DSI there are three ways to represent the
pipeline for an upstream bridge to find the connected downstream
panel or bridge.
1. Child panel or bridge as a conventional device tree child node.
2. Child panel or bridge as an OF-graph port node.
3. Child panel or bridge as an OF-graph ports node.
There are three different downstream panels or bridges that are
possible to connect an upstream DSI host bridge - DSI Panel,
DSI Bridge, and I2C-Configured DSI bridge.
An example of the downstream panel represented as a child node,
&dsi {
compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-dsi";
ports {
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
dsi_to_mic: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&mic_to_dsi>;
};
};
};
panel@0 {
reg = <0>;
};
};
An example of the downstream bridge represented as a port node,
&i2c4 {
bridge@2c {
compatible = "ti,sn65dsi84";
ports {
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
bridge_in_dsi: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&dsi_out_bridge>;
data-lanes = <1 2>;
};
};
port@2 {
reg = <2>;
bridge_out_panel: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&panel_out_bridge>;
};
};
};
};
};
&dsi {
compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim";
port {
dsi_in_lcdif: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&lcdif_out_dsi>;
};
dsi_out_bridge: endpoint@1 {
reg = <1>;
remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in_dsi>;
};
};
};
An example of the downstream bridge represented as a ports node,
&dsi {
compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim";
ports {
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
dsi_in_lcdif: endpoint@0 {
reg = <0>;
remote-endpoint = <&lcdif_out_dsi>;
};
};
port@1 {
reg = <1>;
dsi_out_bridge: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in_dsi>;
};
};
};
In, summary it is possible to represent all three downstream slaves
devices using OF-graph port or ports node however only DSI Panel and
DSI Bridge are possible but not possible to represent I2C-Configured
DSI bridge child nodes since I2C-Configure bridges are child of I2C
node, not upstream DSI host bridge and it is must represent them
endpoint port linking.
This indeed means, the OF-graph port or ports representation is
mandatory for I2C-Configured DSI bridges.
This patch tries to add an OF-graph port or ports representation
detection code on top of existing child node detection.
It is possible to replace the entire detection code using existing
drm_of helper drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge but it will break the
Exynos DSI since the pipeline doesn't support OF-graph port or ports
node.
Overall, this patch has a combination of child and OF-graph pipeline
detections in order to support the backward compatibility of Exynos
DSI child node and i.MX8M Mini/Nano/Plus OF-graph port or ports
node pipelines.
This is the first common DSI host bridge driver that needs to support
all possible downstream connection pipeline combinations.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Exynos DSI already converted into a bridge driver, so bridge
detach will suppose happened during bridge chain removal done
by the bridge core.
Drop the explicit call chain to detach the bridge.
Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
