mirror of
https://github.com/hardkernel/linux.git
synced 2026-06-06 19:08:57 +09:00
c2b86b727a
The block layer patches for inline encryption are now in upstream, so
update Android to the upstream version of inline encryption. The
fscrypt/f2fs/ext4 patches are also updated to the latest version sent
upstream (since they can't be updated separately from the block layer
patches).
Changes v6 => v7:
- Keyslot management is now done on a per-request basis rather than a
per-bio basis.
- Storage drivers can now specify the maximum number of bytes they
can accept for the data unit number (DUN) for each crypto algorithm,
and upper layers can specify the minimum number of bytes of DUN they
want with the blk_crypto_key they send with the bio - a driver is
only considered to support a blk_crypto_key if the driver supports at
least as many DUN bytes as the upper layer wants. This is necessary
because storage drivers may not support as many bytes as the
algorithm specification dictates (for e.g. UFS only supports 8 byte
DUNs for AES-256-XTS, even though the algorithm specification
says DUNs are 16 bytes long).
- Introduce SB_INLINECRYPT to keep track of whether inline encryption
is enabled for a filesystem (instead of using an fscrypt_operation).
- Expose keyslot manager declaration and embed it within ufs_hba to
clean up code.
- Make blk-crypto preclude blk-integrity.
- Some bug fixes
- Introduce UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_CRYPTO for UFS drivers that don't
support inline encryption (yet)
Changes v7 => v8:
- Pass a struct blk_ksm_keyslot * around instead of slot numbers which
simplifies some functions and passes around arguments with better types
- Make bios with no encryption context avoid making calls into blk-crypto
by checking for the presence of bi_crypt_context before making the call
- Make blk-integrity preclude inline encryption support at probe time
- Many many cleanups
Changes v8 => v9:
- Don't open code bio_has_crypt_ctx into callers of blk-crypto functions.
- Lots of cleanups
Changes v9 => v10:
- Incorporate Eric's fix for allowing en/decryption to happen as usual via
fscrypt in the case that hardware doesn't support the desired crypto
configuration, but blk-crypto-fallback is disabled. (Introduce
struct blk_crypto_config and blk_crypto_config_supported for fscrypt
to call, to check that either blk-crypto-fallback is enabled or the
device supports the crypto configuration).
- Update docs
- Lots of cleanups
Changes v10 => v11:
- We now allocate a new bio_crypt_ctx for each request instead of
pulling and reusing the one in the bio inserted into the request. The
bio_crypt_ctx of a bio is freed after the bio is ended.
- Make each blk_ksm_keyslot store a pointer to the blk_crypto_key
instead of a copy of the blk_crypto_key, so that each blk_crypto_key
will have its own keyslot. We also won't need to compute the siphash
for a blk_crypto_key anymore.
- Minor cleanups
Changes v11 => v12:
- Inlined some fscrypt functions
- Minor cleanups and improved comments
Changes v12 => v13:
- Updated docs
- Minor cleanups
- rebased onto linux-block/for-next
Changes v13 => fscrypt/f2fs/ext4 upstream patch series
- rename struct fscrypt_info::ci_key to ci_enc_key
- set dun bytes more precisely in fscrypt
- cleanups
Bug: 137270441
Test: Test cuttlefish boots both with and without inlinecrypt mount
option specified in fstab, while using both F2FS and EXT4 for
userdata.img. Also verified ciphertext via
"atest -v vts_kernel_encryption_test"
Also tested by running gce-xfstests on both the
auto and encrypt test groups on EXT4 and F2FS both with and
without the inlinecrypt mount option. The UFS changes were
tested on a Pixel 4 device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200514003727.69001-1-satyat@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fscrypt/20200617075732.213198-1-satyat@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200617081841.218985-1-satyat@google.com/
Change-Id: I57c10d370bf006c9dfcf173f21a720413017761e
Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
script/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with